Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: lockjaw-express]
#2172290
10/11/16 05:44 PM
10/11/16 05:44 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
The HP, clutch and tires won't like each other.
Please don't buy a clutch based on manufacturer HP estimates.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: lockjaw-express]
#2172301
10/11/16 05:59 PM
10/11/16 05:59 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 562 Ohio
lockjaw-express
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 562
Ohio
|
Hi Madscientist,
McLeod told me that the new 1200HP dual disc ceramic clutch will work just fine for my application for the street...they just told me not to dump the clutch at a standstill with sticky tires or I will break the transmission and rear end.
I am building a street hemi car that will not see a track, and will not be dropping the clutch at a launch...I just want great traction without any jumining around.
I thought the M&H Street Radials would be the ticket, and they also have the matching wide 8" tires for the front.
In my Street/Strip GTX I have a Lenco 5spd with a McLeod Soft-lok Sintered-iron Clutch that is designed for a clutchless transmission...So, I have a car for the strip,a nd one for the street.
Prior to the passing of Tim Hyatt (RIP) he told me that the Soft-loc will not work with a standard shifting manual transmission for street driving. McLeod told me the same.
Holley has a new Clutch out that is a long style, but noting to fit a Gen II hemi car.
So, what do you suggest?
Mark
Last edited by lockjaw-express; 10/11/16 06:05 PM.
|
|
|
Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: lockjaw-express]
#2172314
10/11/16 06:15 PM
10/11/16 06:15 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277 West Coast, USA
jbc426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277
West Coast, USA
|
What size rear tires? This car won't need 4.10's. It's going to have traction problems unless you get it just right and probably even then.
I would stay way from Caltracs on a street car. Mine rode really harsh and only really work well on a smooth track/road. I sold mine, and at Dr Diff's recommendation, put a pair of passenger side 2800lbs SS springs in my 3700 lbs car along with a pair of properly adjusted slapper bars. The car's rear suspension works better than anything else I've ever tried over the decades, and nearly dead hooks on the street. Heck, I pulled a Hellcat by 3 car lengths out of the hole, and still beat him at the 1/4 with half your horsepower.
EFI and an overdrive would sure be nice with some 3.91's. That way you could actually go somewhere.
1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's 1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
|
|
|
Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: lockjaw-express]
#2172433
10/11/16 08:52 PM
10/11/16 08:52 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
Hi Madscientist,
McLeod told me that the new 1200HP dual disc ceramic clutch will work just fine for my application for the street...they just told me not to dump the clutch at a standstill with sticky tires or I will break the transmission and rear end.
I am building a street hemi car that will not see a track, and will not be dropping the clutch at a launch...I just want great traction without any jumining around.
I thought the M&H Street Radials would be the ticket, and they also have the matching wide 8" tires for the front.
In my Street/Strip GTX I have a Lenco 5spd with a McLeod Soft-lok Sintered-iron Clutch that is designed for a clutchless transmission...So, I have a car for the strip,a nd one for the street.
Prior to the passing of Tim Hyatt (RIP) he told me that the Soft-loc will not work with a standard shifting manual transmission for street driving. McLeod told me the same.
Holley has a new Clutch out that is a long style, but noting to fit a Gen II hemi car.
So, what do you suggest?
Mark Then McLeod and Tim Hyatt are both wrong. I drive a Sof-Lok on the street. Have for years. If you are not going to beat on it, the M&H's will be fine. Didn't know you had a second car. Seen way too many guys say they will never hit the strip, buy a clutch like you did, and wonder why it won't shift above 6k or even less.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: lockjaw-express]
#2172476
10/11/16 09:50 PM
10/11/16 09:50 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
Right now, I have it at 800 pounds of base an 14 grams per lever.
I think both are too high, but I'm going to try and back into the tune up instead of trying to run into face first so to speak.
I have run it as low as 600 pounds and no base on the street. Just had it freshened up. Only had normal wear. IDK exactly how many street miles were on it, but it was well over 10k.
I use a standard 833 gear box.
McLeod sends the plate out with 200 pounds in it. I would never run it that low. Even with a light car and a butt load of gear.
I just opened the box with my double adjustable Viking shocks in it! I'm guessing my clutch tune up will change significantly. Now I'm pissed I didn't order the rear shocks. Looks like I need to get on the phone and place an order.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: lockjaw-express]
#2172551
10/11/16 11:37 PM
10/11/16 11:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,022 MN
JERICOGTX
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,022
MN
|
McLeod sends the clutch out at 200, but you MUST bring the pressure up to 1200, then back it down once you make a hit. That should be clear in the directions McLeod sent with the clutch assembly.
Been running a Soft Lok for 18 years now. It's been 13 years since Tim Hyatt rebuilt it. I'm personally not a fan of running the clutch way down on the ragged edge. Keep some pressure in it and it will live. Mine is around 7-800 now with counter weight.
69 GTX
68 Road Runner
|
|
|
Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: lockjaw-express]
#2172580
10/12/16 12:14 AM
10/12/16 12:14 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
Hi MadSci,
With my combo for the street how would you set the clutch up? Also, how did you measure the base pressure? Did you have McLeod set your clutch up?
I also have a stock 1970 833 box being built for me by Brewers. I like the idea of keeping my stock trans cross member.
What is your car combo set up for the street?
Sorry for all of the questions, but I want to make sure I don't buy twice, if you know what I mean.
Thank you for the advise!
Mark Jericho has some good advice. Start at the 1200 pound mark and work it down. You don't always have to run counterweight. There are 6 adjusters on the cover. If you back them all the way down, you end up at 200 pounds. I forget the pounds per turn, but you just turn the adjuster to the pressure you want. I was using a 2.66 first gear and a 4.56 rear, but I just finished up a 3.09 first gear box. You won't need all that first gear with the torque you have. It's a shame more guys don't put in the effort to learn and use a sintered iron clutch on the street.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: lockjaw-express]
#2172583
10/12/16 12:18 AM
10/12/16 12:18 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
Hays has that new Dragon Claw clutch, alot like Mcleod RXT but with a sprung hub. My RXT is not very street friendly with solid hubs, can you say jerky?
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: lockjaw-express]
#2172587
10/12/16 12:22 AM
10/12/16 12:22 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890 North Alabama
Monte_Smith
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,890
North Alabama
|
"great rear traction"..........on the street, with big power, 4.10 gear, a clutch, likely a stiff low gear and drag radials. All that is a recipe for no traction, ever. Be a blast to drive, but any chance of sticking it is going to be non existent. The best in the business have never been able to make drag radials and a clutch work on the track, much less the street.
As to what rear suspension, if leafs is what you want. Split monos with an extremely stiff front segment, cal tracs and very good shocks
|
|
|
Re: '68 Hemi Super Bee High Performance Street Rear Suspension
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#2172594
10/12/16 12:25 AM
10/12/16 12:25 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
"great rear traction"..........on the street, with big power, 4.10 gear, a clutch, likely a stiff low gear and drag radials. All that is a recipe for no traction, ever. Be a blast to drive, but any chance of sticking it is going to be non existent. The best in the business have never been able to make drag radials and a clutch work on the track, much less the street.
As to what rear suspension, if leafs is what you want. Split monos with an extremely stiff front segment, cal tracs and very good shocks That was kinda my point about the tires and the clutch not getting along very well. Nothing against M&H's because I use them. Just not the radials. I'm sure I could drop a screen name that would tell you a simple hydraulic cylinder would make any clutch radial tire friendly.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
|
|