Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Early 5.7 hemi intake valve use in magnum heads #2164100
09/29/16 01:18 AM
09/29/16 01:18 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035
Missouri U.S.A.
7
71yelladustr Offline OP
super stock
71yelladustr  Offline OP
super stock
7

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,035
Missouri U.S.A.
Just wondering if anyone has ever tried this? I have a set of factory mag heads I'm working over for claimer racing that require production castings, and was looking for a little more flow. At first glance they seem to be very close in length if not the same and look like they might be a cheap upgrade for more flow. Stem size is the same so no guide work, and the only difference I see is the the lock grooves. I already have a full set of hemi valves so basically all I'm out will be the valve job. Since the hemi valve is only slightly larger at 2.00" vs the stock magnum is 1.92" its not a huge gain but would surely be worth a couple CFM.
TIA


392 gen III hemi on E-85 727 trans Dana 60
10.02@134
Re: Early 5.7 hemi intake valve use in magnum heads [Re: 71yelladustr] #2164504
09/29/16 05:23 PM
09/29/16 05:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
You lose by my calculation between 0.060 and 0.080 installed height. Depending on your lift rules, you may have trouble finding a valve spring strong enough that'll fit in that small distance without coil bind.

However, Comp Cams is now recommending running springs to the minimum allowable height whenever possible as it damps out spring harmonics. At least that's what I remember.

Hughes 1110 springs is where I'd be looking.

Another concern is valve head shape. The Hemi head may require a different head shape than a wedge, like tulip instead of nail head, something like that. The wrong head shape may negate any flow increase from diameter increase. Or not.

R.

Last edited by dogdays; 09/29/16 05:26 PM.






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1