Does "Licensed by Chrysler" really mean anything?
#2071429
05/11/16 01:31 PM
05/11/16 01:31 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 291 St. Louis
Imrare
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 291
St. Louis
|
Since completing the OE restoration of my AAR Cuda, I inquired into several firms producing T/A exhaust systems for my AAR Cuda. My goal was to purchase a system as produced by Chrysler (or as close as possible). I elected to choose a vendor that boasted about their product being licensed by Chrysler, that prototypes had been sent to Chrysler for approval, and this system was "dead on". I ordered the complete system, head pipes, mufflers, exhaust pipes/tip, hangers, etc. I was very disappointed in what I received. Immediately it was clear from looking at the head pipes that this wasn't OE as none of the "flats" that Chrysler put in the original pipes for clearance purposes where present. Next, the mufflers, while having the Chrysler logo, 2-70 date code, and a part number embossed on the muffler, they were not the correct font, correct placement, and the logo was much larger than the original. Plus, my "original" muffler had no part number embossed on the body of the muffler. Most disconcerting of all was the fact that the muffler was not even dimensionally correct, they were shorter and more narrow than the original Chrysler muffler. Next, the tail pipes did not have the correct length of hanger bracket (upside down "L" shape) welded to the tip. My original bracket was 1 3/4 inch from the top of the chrome tip to the top of the hanger bracket, this on is 1 5/8. 1/8 doesn't sound like much but when installed on the car it made constant contact with the torque box. I could go on about the muffler hangers and muffler straps being different from original, but I have a two part question. First, has anyone else experienced this type of quality control in other products licensed by Chrysler? And second, does anyone know of a vendor that is making a "correct" AAR exhaust system? I've been told by a couple of vendors that only one company makes these exhaust tips and mufflers and I just have to make do with what they produce. Is there any truth to that? NOTE: the picture of the muffler strap on the muffler is the "original" strap and hanger on the "licensed" muffler.
Last edited by Imrare; 05/11/16 01:44 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Does "Licensed by Chrysler" really mean anything?
[Re: Imrare]
#2071437
05/11/16 01:56 PM
05/11/16 01:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,720 Moved to N.E. Tennessee
GomangoCuda
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,720
Moved to N.E. Tennessee
|
I think licensed just means that they paid to use Chrysler's name, logos, and part numbers. I doubt that Chrysler/fiat cares how accurate the parts are as long as they get their money.
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
|
|
|
Re: Does "Licensed by Chrysler" really mean anything?
[Re: GomangoCuda]
#2071503
05/11/16 03:46 PM
05/11/16 03:46 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,336 Ball Ground, Georgia
Dixie
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,336
Ball Ground, Georgia
|
I think licensed just means that they paid to use Chrysler's name, logos, and part numbers. I doubt that Chrysler/fiat cares how accurate the parts are as long as they get their money. In my opinion, Chrysler doesn't care about correctness. They only want the cash. Going back to the mid-90's I've dealt with various orgs for Chrysler licensing, and while they change from time to time, it's about the $$$$$, not correctness. So, there is a lot of slack on what they'll accept. For what it's worth while I worked at Year One, I also dealt with GM. They were similar. The money they make on licensing products is a rounding error for them compared to new vehicle/product sales. So, it doesn't get the attention most car guys would like. Different vendors take the correctness of their product differently. Some care greatly, some not so much. That's why some licensed stuff is nice and some not. It's at the discretion of the vendor, not FCA. Again, just my opinion.
|
|
|
Re: Does "Licensed by Chrysler" really mean anything?
[Re: Imrare]
#2071506
05/11/16 03:51 PM
05/11/16 03:51 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154 Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
|
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
|
Is it Chrysler? Or FIAT that owns the rights?
When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
|
|
|
Re: Does "Licensed by Chrysler" really mean anything?
[Re: Porter67]
#2071577
05/11/16 06:05 PM
05/11/16 06:05 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,938 Spokane Valley, WA
Big Bad Bee
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,938
Spokane Valley, WA
|
I pulled my new B body glovebox out of the bubble wrap to take a look last weekend and had to laugh. Right on top was the authorized Mopar Restoration Parts sticker. I looked at the piece of junk and just shook my head. In the words of the great wide receiver for the Arizona Cardinals, Rod Tidwell, "SHOW ME THE MONEY!!!!"
I wish I could help you. Nothing worse than spending the hard earned cash and coming up with crap.
I’m listening.
|
|
|
Re: Does "Licensed by Chrysler" really mean anything?
[Re: Imrare]
#2071828
05/12/16 12:41 AM
05/12/16 12:41 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,145 ontario calif
ns1aar
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,145
ontario calif
|
From what I'm finding I think you must be right. I am surprised that Chrysler would allow their name to be used on sub-standard parts though because, in the end, it seems like it would hurt the Brand?
Is anyone making any OE AAR exhaust? I have not seen one yet
NS1AAR
|
|
|
Re: Does "Licensed by Chrysler" really mean anything?
[Re: RJS]
#2071870
05/12/16 02:14 AM
05/12/16 02:14 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003 Salem
Grizzly
Moparts Proctologist
|
Moparts Proctologist
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,003
Salem
|
.................. Plus I hate these posts that show all this stuff being wrong but not saying who the vendor is, how does that help the hobby??? .............. Because they are too afraid of...............what I do not know? A group of sticky threads for A, B, C, E-body etc. inferior parts listings/rants has been asked for over the years on here and nobody will do it. Would sure save the rest of us some money and make some useless vendors unemployed where they belong.
Mo' Farts
Moderated by "tbagger".
|
|
|
Re: Does "Licensed by Chrysler" really mean anything?
[Re: Grizzly]
#2072141
05/12/16 05:45 PM
05/12/16 05:45 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,938 Spokane Valley, WA
Big Bad Bee
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,938
Spokane Valley, WA
|
.................. Plus I hate these posts that show all this stuff being wrong but not saying who the vendor is, how does that help the hobby??? .............. Because they are too afraid of...............what I do not know? A group of sticky threads for A, B, C, E-body etc. inferior parts listings/rants has been asked for over the years on here and nobody will do it. Would sure save the rest of us some money and make some useless vendors unemployed where they belong. I think it's much needed and would save people a ton of money and trouble but I think Tom won't do it because things will get REAL divisive REAL quick. It would have to be very strictly maintained, regulated and documented because folks would be taking shots at products and vendors who might be current or future members or advertisers on Moparts. I could see a forum dedicated to rating parts, vendors and services providers. The biggest financial loss on my car project came at the hands of a transport guy that used to advertise here. I would appreciate a forum that would keep my story available so as to save anyone else the grief.
I’m listening.
|
|
|
Re: Does "Licensed by Chrysler" really mean anything?
[Re: Big Bad Bee]
#2072212
05/12/16 07:53 PM
05/12/16 07:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,055 Eau Claire, WI
Charger727
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,055
Eau Claire, WI
|
.................. Plus I hate these posts that show all this stuff being wrong but not saying who the vendor is, how does that help the hobby??? .............. Because they are too afraid of...............what I do not know? A group of sticky threads for A, B, C, E-body etc. inferior parts listings/rants has been asked for over the years on here and nobody will do it. Would sure save the rest of us some money and make some useless vendors unemployed where they belong. I think it's much needed and would save people a ton of money and trouble but I think Tom won't do it because things will get REAL divisive REAL quick. It would have to be very strictly maintained, regulated and documented because folks would be taking shots at products and vendors who might be current or future members or advertisers on Moparts. I could see a forum dedicated to rating parts, vendors and services providers. The biggest financial loss on my car project came at the hands of a transport guy that used to advertise here. I would appreciate a forum that would keep my story available so as to save anyone else the grief. Almost every junk aftermarket part comes from a single manufacturer - blaming the vendor does nothing since they have no choice if someone wants to buy the part Best thing a good vendor will do is take it back no questions asked I've tried to buy a 70 B-body rallye dash woodgrain set for years - Yearone, Classic Industries, Mr.Moparts - all ranged from total junk to complete junk - all "Official" restoration parts - clearly all from the same manufacturer
|
|
|
|
|