Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Low compression cam question #2065023
04/30/16 11:38 PM
04/30/16 11:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,138
Central NC
gch Offline OP
master
gch  Offline OP
master

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,138
Central NC
I have a stock smogger 440 that runs well and has good even compression numbers.I may play with it a little and swap some closed chamber 915 heads I have on it and of course a cam as well.
What would make a better running motor in a heavy c body with 3.21 gears and an 11" converter?

A comp 260 High Energy ground on a 113 lobe separation(have one here already) or some thing like a Hughes Whiplash design?

Which would you use and why?

Re: Low compression cam question [Re: gch] #2065060
05/01/16 01:11 AM
05/01/16 01:11 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
Quote:
A comp 260 High Energy ground on a 113 lobe separation(have one here already) or some thing like a Hughes Whiplash design?
Which would you use and why?
(1) this one (2) you have it & its mild I believe. after installation I would max out your dist subsystems in order to get the most out of it


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: Low compression cam question [Re: gch] #2065080
05/01/16 01:58 AM
05/01/16 01:58 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
DARTH V8Я Offline
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!
DARTH V8Я  Offline
Oh No!! I just had a moron attack!

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,154
Its a TRAP!
Ran a 509 cam on a 8.5:1 440 once, it wanted a lot of timing.. something around 40*.


When it takes more than a sweet mullet to prove you rule at the trailer park..
Re: Low compression cam question [Re: gch] #2065152
05/01/16 10:21 AM
05/01/16 10:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,985
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
master
gregsdart  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,985
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
A cam cut for your situation might be the best option hear. LSA requirements change with compression ratio and intake valve size to cubic inch. Basically the lower the compression and the smaller the intake valve per cube, the tighter you want the LSA. A 383 with 9.5 compression is going to want a wider lsa than a 440 with 7.8 compression, yet the catalogs all list the same cam for both.
David Vizzards book on how to build hp has a chart that predicts your combo would want a very narrow LSA due to low compression and 26 cubes per inch of intake valve. Total duration would be less than a wide LSA cam, and low compression needs to keep the exhaust valve closed longer to use the available cylinder pressure. Not having had a cam custom cut for a deal like yours, I can't say for sure how well it works, but trust his experience. I would be very tempted to get a 260h cam custom cut on as narrow as 104, and use a converter out of a 340 or 383 car for best results. If it works like he says, it ought to have a touch of thump to it yet hit hard at low rpm.

Last edited by gregsdart; 05/01/16 10:39 AM.

8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1