v

I can steal anyone's photo!!

Don't forget it's NA too....

MP .590 cam as I recall also....

Looks good man.................

Damn, some of them puppys straight out fly...........

Ain't that the truth.

Was even wondering if my vert slippage has to do w/the trap r`s and lookin back, I trapped bet 6700-7200 depending...........

Mounted up the 28x10.5 w`s today unbalanced and went for a blast and they seem very smooth to me although the reduced circumference makes fwy driving a bit high r`s wise but no biggie. After my blast I pulled the car in the shack and a minute later the good ol Sheriff`s went screamin by..............

Those calcs don't factor in bias-ply tire growth, so your slippage isn't that high.

So when you taking it to the track?

If my friends car isn't ready in time for the Vegas race, he`ll tow me this Thu. for an 1/8th mile jaunt at Irwindale............ Kinda curious what if any gains I`ll see w/all of the changes and weight reduction I`ve made in the last two years.............

What's the side to side width on them and what rim size are you using?

Do you mean section width? Didn't measure it but I`m on a 10" rim and their chart shows something like 13.1 ............

Yes on the section width and yes with a 10in rim. Every book I saw with specs had a diff one lol. I was looking at them or the 12.5 qtp. If you can measure yours I would appreciate it.

They are close to their 13.1 section width and I love the QTP`s in the 29x13.5 size myself but have never been on a real slick w/this motor combo so hopefully we`ll soon see............

Hey Dom
Don't know what springs your running but I too hated the air shock look of the 70's. I put a set of calverts mono's with the 1" lower spring set up. In actuality it was closer to 2" drop. Had to buy shorter shocks also.

The rear segments are many years old and I went w/the 25" ft. deal a couple years ago so not sure but may hit up calvert about the rear section after I get a few good passes on it as it sits..........