Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Ohio Joe] #2050862
04/10/16 07:34 AM
04/10/16 07:34 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
deaks Offline
master
deaks  Offline
master

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
Originally Posted By Ohio Joe
This has gone 5.95 with a 470 on E85


At what weight though ?


69 Dart GTS 440 mopar .590 cam, Edelbrock heads, 3200#
best et 6.45, 106.78, 10.14, 132.88 mph, 1.47 60ft
best 60ft 1.36
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: deaks] #2050867
04/10/16 07:57 AM
04/10/16 07:57 AM
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 51
1.5 miles west of Jacksonburg ...
Ohio Joe Offline
member
Ohio Joe  Offline
member

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 51
1.5 miles west of Jacksonburg ...
2950, it weighs 100 lbs less than our 66 dart.


66 Dart GT " Rat Racer"
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Ohio Joe] #2051008
04/10/16 01:33 PM
04/10/16 01:33 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
Originally Posted By Ohio Joe
2950, it weighs 100 lbs less than our 66 dart.


Nice........what heads........


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Ohio Joe] #2051029
04/10/16 02:03 PM
04/10/16 02:03 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,030
ohio
6
67mprfan Offline
super stock
67mprfan  Offline
super stock
6

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,030
ohio
Originally Posted By Ohio Joe
This has gone 5.95 with a 470 on E85




Can you tell us more about your combo

IMG_20150704_125534_036.jpgIMG_20151102_200152_195.jpg

71 demon stock stroke 440/indy ez-1 running 10.10 @ 132.14 mph in the 1/4 and 6.36 @ 107.46 mph in the 1/8 not in the same weekend but It did it then I sold it.
67 Belvedere that worked it's way in the 10's
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Sport440] #2051287
04/10/16 08:31 PM
04/10/16 08:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 127
California
M
Moneypit6 Offline
member
Moneypit6  Offline
member
M

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 127
California
Why not a 499 using the same components except a compression height of 1.37? Slightly more stable compression height and slightly better rod ratio for those on the fence worrying about the 512 longevity. Seems good to me. Fits nicely between the 470 and 512.


70 Roadrunner almost ready to come off the rotisserie smile
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Thumperdart] #2051338
04/10/16 09:50 PM
04/10/16 09:50 PM
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 51
1.5 miles west of Jacksonburg ...
Ohio Joe Offline
member
Ohio Joe  Offline
member

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 51
1.5 miles west of Jacksonburg ...
It has Indy SR'S . We call the car Spare Parts because the motor belongs to a friend who wasn't racing at the time and the tranny and vert belong to another friend . We rushed putting it together for Norwalk. To say the least we were very suprise what it ran.

20160403_150944-1.jpg

66 Dart GT " Rat Racer"
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Eric] #2051832
04/11/16 01:53 PM
04/11/16 01:53 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
deaks Offline
master
deaks  Offline
master

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
Who ported the heads, cam size, comp please ? I'm just about to fit a 470 in mine.
Mick


69 Dart GTS 440 mopar .590 cam, Edelbrock heads, 3200#
best et 6.45, 106.78, 10.14, 132.88 mph, 1.47 60ft
best 60ft 1.36
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Eric] #2051899
04/11/16 03:21 PM
04/11/16 03:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357
Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda Offline
I Live Here
an8sec70cuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,357
Marion, South Carolina [><]
I'd go w/ the 4.25" stroke.

Seems there was a discussion a while back by one of the big name builders...like Kaase or maybe Reher-Morrison, I cant remember who exactly. They basically said the rod-stroke ratio didn't really matter when it came to making power.


CHIP
'70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60
'69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60
'71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75
'73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75
'90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt
'06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: an8sec70cuda] #2051912
04/11/16 03:32 PM
04/11/16 03:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,872
Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize Offline
master
Streetwize  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,872
Weddington, N.C.
512" Built all the B/RB combinations from 431" all the way up to 517", bigger is more and .200" of rod length won't mean diddly, especially on a low/moderate RPM torque motor. Again, piston selection from all the major Piston Mfg's is all over that 451/512 1.32" Compression height slug.

If 6.535" seems short for a 4.25" stroke in a 9.98" deck, remember that there are 10X as many big block 496" Chevies with only 6.135" and 6.385" rods running around.

Last edited by Streetwize; 04/11/16 03:34 PM.

WIZE

World's Quickest Diahatsu Rocky (??) 414" Stroker Small block Mopar Powered. 10.84 @ 123...and gettin' quicker!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mWzLma3YGI

In Car:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjXcf95e6v0
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: deaks] #2051957
04/11/16 04:44 PM
04/11/16 04:44 PM
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 51
1.5 miles west of Jacksonburg ...
Ohio Joe Offline
member
Ohio Joe  Offline
member

Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 51
1.5 miles west of Jacksonburg ...
Mick,hate to say but I don't know a whole lot about the motor.i just own the body. I "think" Duwane Porter did the heads and spec ed the cam. Sorry, but that's about all I know about the motor.


66 Dart GT " Rat Racer"
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Eric] #2052136
04/11/16 08:47 PM
04/11/16 08:47 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
I went with the 499 stroked 400 block. I figured it would be easier on the engine block at high RPM (lighter weight, lower acceleration rates and loading when switching direction, less side wall thrust loading?)
Down side with the short piston might be piston rock/ring seal on the intake stroke?
You can get a 4.15" crank with the 2.20" rod journal, that will give a better selection of rods/rod lengths.
Currently using the Hughes CNC ported MW Victor heads. I did not cc the Hughes heads, but compression with 75cc should be around 12.4:1 with zero decked flat tops. I used the old 440 source stroker kit with I-Beam rods and ARP2000 bolts, and the BCR aluminum main caps with girdle.
Not too many runs on it, because of the issues with the old Victor heads. Just got it running with the new CNC heads and E-85 last year, so we'll see how this year goes?

I think the 4.25" stroke low deck is a good choice for most street/strip cars that are not going to run 7000+ RPM.

I do have the 4.25" crank in the 440 block in the convertible smile

Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Streetwize] #2052191
04/11/16 09:53 PM
04/11/16 09:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,986
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
master
gregsdart  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,986
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
Originally Posted By Streetwize
512" Built all the B/RB combinations from 431" all the way up to 517", bigger is more and .200" of rod length won't mean diddly, especially on a low/moderate RPM torque motor. Again, piston selection from all the major Piston Mfg's is all over that 451/512 1.32" Compression height slug.

If 6.535" seems short for a 4.25" stroke in a 9.98" deck, remember that there are 10X as many big block 496" Chevies with only 6.135" and 6.385" rods running around.

Yep!


8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: Ohio Joe] #2055125
04/15/16 07:56 PM
04/15/16 07:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 581
Hamiltucky
R
RBDuster Offline
mopar
RBDuster  Offline
mopar
R

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 581
Hamiltucky
Originally Posted By Ohio Joe
Mick,hate to say but I don't know a whole lot about the motor.i just own the body. I "think" Duwane Porter did the heads and spec ed the cam. Sorry, but that's about all I know about the motor.


combo is 3.90 stroke, 4.375 bore, 6.700 rod, flat top pistons with a total compression of 11.4 to 1, Cam is a comp 661 lift and 274 duration at .0050. Heads are Indy SR's that were ported by Dwayne Porter. Indy intake with a Horsepower Innovations 850 E85 carb.

Last edited by RBDuster; 04/15/16 07:58 PM.
Re: 499 vs 512 low deck [Re: fbs63] #2055193
04/15/16 09:46 PM
04/15/16 09:46 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
Originally Posted By fbs63
One thing about the LD 512. The 1.54 rod ratio adds more thrust on the cylinder wall. I would make sure you have the block sonic tested and find a good one. No need to be worried about a short comp height. OEM engines now are all close to 1" comp height and go 200,000 miles. In your light car with the heads you have I would do a 470. Quicker rpms and your heads will support 470 cubes well.



THIS................ drive Been streetin/racing mine for almost 15 years w/the same 413 off-set stroke crank and Chevy Eagle rods and I just run junky ol E-brock home ported RPM heads and a solid roller..........


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1