8 3/4 brakes
#2046369
04/04/16 04:26 PM
04/04/16 04:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685 pennsylvania
poboyengineering
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
|
I am building a Dakota for drags,and want the lightest, cheapest rear brakes possible. Will the 9 backing plates and drums work on an 8 3/4? FWIW, I am using aftermarket 35 spline axles.
It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.
Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
|
|
|
Re: 8 3/4 brakes
[Re: poboyengineering]
#2046477
04/04/16 06:55 PM
04/04/16 06:55 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
only 9" brakes that work an an 8 3/4 are early A body ones with the 4" bolt pattern, the flange offset is different as well. Which basically means not compatible with your existing axles.
10 drums are the cheapest lightest swap, right now.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: 8 3/4 brakes
[Re: poboyengineering]
#2046507
04/04/16 07:13 PM
04/04/16 07:13 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 96,661 On The Boat, On The Lake, Wa. ...
amxautox
Still Retired. Still Posting on Moparts. A Lot.
|
Still Retired. Still Posting on Moparts. A Lot.
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 96,661
On The Boat, On The Lake, Wa. ...
|
cheapen too much and you won't be able to stop.
well, there IS usually a fence down there, or a sand trap, or a river.
Tom
"Everyone should believe in something; I believe I'll go fishing."
-Henry David Thoreau
Men and fish are alike. They both get into trouble when they open their mouths
author unknown
|
|
|
Re: 8 3/4 brakes
[Re: 72Swinger]
#2046733
04/04/16 11:47 PM
04/04/16 11:47 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Aerospace makes the lightest IIRC, or LAMB. Way out side the cheap parameter though
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: 8 3/4 brakes
[Re: poboyengineering]
#2047526
04/05/16 11:35 PM
04/05/16 11:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685 pennsylvania
poboyengineering
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
|
I have a set of 11" backing plates, and whatever the 8 1/4 in the Dak came with. What is the lighter setup, the narrow 11" drums or the wide 10"?
It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.
Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
|
|
|
Re: 8 3/4 brakes
[Re: poboyengineering]
#2047569
04/06/16 12:18 AM
04/06/16 12:18 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
rockauto lists weights of the drums.
not sure what a narrow 11" is.
or a wide 10".
applications?
For the 87 M body the 10" is 19lbs, 11": is 23lbs for just the drums.
Guess you can figure which is more all together (hint 11")
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: 8 3/4 brakes
[Re: Supercuda]
#2048356
04/06/16 10:07 PM
04/06/16 10:07 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 240 Plano, Texas
68cuda440
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 240
Plano, Texas
|
rockauto lists weights of the drums.
not sure what a narrow 11" is.
or a wide 10".
applications?
For the 87 M body the 10" is 19lbs, 11": is 23lbs for just the drums.
Guess you can figure which is more all together (hint 11") Steve - actually the 11" incurs a double penalty. The majority of the drum's mass is at the perimeter, this means the rotational inertia is much higher. So, in addition to the extra weight you have to accelerate and carry unsprung, you also have to accelerate this mass rotationally! That is why a disk brake rotor, even if it weighs about the same, is better for racing. The mass of the rotor is distributed differently and its moment of inertia will be lower (given the same total weight).
Michael
1968 Barracuda Notchback Coupe
440 EFI 6-pack, T56 Magnum 6-spd
|
|
|
Re: 8 3/4 brakes
[Re: poboyengineering]
#2048400
04/06/16 10:44 PM
04/06/16 10:44 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Oh I agree a disc setup is "lighter" in use but cheaper? Most disc kits are a lot more than a stock drum setup, especially if you already have it on hand. Just trying to stick to the cheapest parameter.
Example, using Dr Diff's site for reference, 10" drum setup complete is $350, cheapest rear disc kit, for drag race use only no E brake which is important if they do safety inspections for registration like in TX, is $509. No weights listed for either. Cheapest rear disc with e brake is $600.
If I had no brakes to begin with I'd probably go with a disc setup in back myself.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: 8 3/4 brakes
[Re: poboyengineering]
#2048593
04/07/16 03:42 AM
04/07/16 03:42 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685 pennsylvania
poboyengineering
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 685
pennsylvania
|
Thanks for the physics lesson. I will know what I have to work with this weekend, and go to the junkyard if needed.
It may be ugly, but it sure is slow.
Girls comb their hair in rear view mirrors and the boys try to look so hard....
|
|
|
|
|