Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#2023478
03/02/16 10:43 PM
03/02/16 10:43 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,210 PA.
pittsburghracer
"Little"John
|
"Little"John
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 20,210
PA.
|
I know when I tube the lifter galleys on my small blocks I double and triple check to make sure I redrilled all the needed oil passages and followed the instructions to a T. To make sure I dig out my old mopar manuals just to double-check I didn't forget something.
1970 Duster Edelbrock headed 408 5.984@112.52 422 Indy headed small block 5.982@112.56 mph 9.42@138.27
Livin and lovin life one day at a time
|
|
|
Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: mopar dave]
#2023537
03/03/16 12:10 AM
03/03/16 12:10 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
Dave understand that at just about 70 psi the pump is blowing off on the by-pass.. thats not flow to the engine...all the pumps I have checked the by-pass on blew of real close to 70 psi + or - a small amount.. so all that extra pressure you have will hurt the flow ![wave wave](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/wave.gif)
|
|
|
Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: mopar dave]
#2023607
03/03/16 01:32 AM
03/03/16 01:32 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
OK. Well I gave all my parts to a machines and had faith he knew what he was doing. He gave me the ok everything is good and I took the parts home and measured bearing clearance for piece of mind and assembled. The guy has a good rep for machining and engine building. I guess ya really don't what quality of work your getting til ya have a failure. I know what ya mean.. I've been there... my one engine didnt make a 1/8 mile before it let go... luckily it didnt take out a ton of stuff.. a lifter let go.. that took out 1 head, a couple of pistons and a cyl bore... a sleeve on the block with a new head were the big parts.. that was a quick $3500 for that
Last edited by MR_P_BODY; 03/03/16 01:34 AM.
|
|
|
Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#2023614
03/03/16 01:50 AM
03/03/16 01:50 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
I understand that......but some were saying the 15W/50 was like 50W when cold and it is NOT. Would you think straight 15W was too thick given his combo?......No and neither would anyone else and that is the SAE standard that 15W/50 oil MUST meet when cold. My point was that is wasn't the oil that caused the problem.
He said he had .002. Well how was that checked? With plasti-gauge or with mics. And if mics were used, was it only checked 90* from the parting line in a torqued rod, or in several places. The rod could have been out of round, or the crank pin had taper or wasn't round. .002 in one spot, doesn't mean it had .002 everywhere. I still think it was just tight for some reason. If you want to run em tight, that's fine, but it better be right everywhere You dont pick an oil based on the winter grade number unless you are running in sub freezing temps. Viscosity is based on oil temp. His oil acted like a 50 grade oil when at operating temp. That seems heavy for his clearance. I don't use Gibbs so I can't say why they picked a 50 grade oil. I would have used a quality 30 grade. The oil timing is off on these engines. At the speed the OP is turning he needs a full groove bearing to get oil to the rods on time, or close to it. The only fixes for high RPM (over 8k) are have a crank drilled to the correct oil timing, but I have never had it done. Or, you have to bring the oil to the crank in a different place to correct the timing. And that is a whole nother thread.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: mopar dave]
#2023625
03/03/16 02:05 AM
03/03/16 02:05 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
im not going to do that but how do you know where to put the holes in the crank? Forget that crap... SB mopars have been turning HIGH rpms for YEARS with normal cranks.. the most I ever did on the crank was elongate the oil hole some.. you can do that with a file or have the crank grinder do it (they know what I'm saying on that).. but its just the slot across the oil hole.. as I said before.. I have been 9600 rpm and its still together.. and I sure dont do anything magic ![wave wave](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/wave.gif)
|
|
|
Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: mopar dave]
#2023657
03/03/16 03:30 AM
03/03/16 03:30 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
im not going to do that but how do you know where to put the holes in the crank? You have to have it done when the crank is made. I heard that one from a known Comp guy who did PST and dabbled in PS. I didn't do mine that way. But I'm not about to go into the detail of how I fixed mine because it would take an hour to type. If you really want to know, PM me and I'll do it that way. Mr. Pbody would be one of the only guys I know that can turn a SBM that tight on regular oil timing. Very few guys do it in the first place. Even fewer do it with any level of success. As for oil, I only know one brand. I wouldn't want to tell you a grade for any other oil. Like I said, there is more to oil than base stocks. It's like how they grade an oil. It can pass as a 50, but it might test on the high side of the grade and almost be a 60. You can't tell the difference, but the engine can. So it is very brand specific. I may spend some time tomorrow and see if I can find the actual specs of the oil you used. If I can find that, I can see where they blend the oil as far as grade goes.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#2023660
03/03/16 03:32 AM
03/03/16 03:32 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
im not going to do that but how do you know where to put the holes in the crank? Forget that crap... SB mopars have been turning HIGH rpms for YEARS with normal cranks.. the most I ever did on the crank was elongate the oil hole some.. you can do that with a file or have the crank grinder do it (they know what I'm saying on that).. but its just the slot across the oil hole.. as I said before.. I have been 9600 rpm and its still together.. and I sure dont do anything magic You can't correct the oil timing with file. And the oil timing is off, by a mile. All you need to do is stand a sbc next to a sbm. Even Ray Charles can see the timing is off. And you need the cranks too.
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: madscientist]
#2023754
03/03/16 12:30 PM
03/03/16 12:30 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
im not going to do that but how do you know where to put the holes in the crank? Forget that crap... SB mopars have been turning HIGH rpms for YEARS with normal cranks.. the most I ever did on the crank was elongate the oil hole some.. you can do that with a file or have the crank grinder do it (they know what I'm saying on that).. but its just the slot across the oil hole.. as I said before.. I have been 9600 rpm and its still together.. and I sure dont do anything magic You can't correct the oil timing with file. And the oil timing is off, by a mile. All you need to do is stand a sbc next to a sbm. Even Ray Charles can see the timing is off. And you need the cranks too. I'm not trying to correct anything.. it just give it more area for the oil once its out of the hole to hold oil.. I bought a old PS truck crank and that is what was done to it.. then I had another turned down and they did it for me ![wave wave](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/wave.gif)
|
|
|
Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#2023764
03/03/16 12:52 PM
03/03/16 12:52 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,170 CT
GTX MATT
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,170
CT
|
Factory motors used to run as tight as his and straight 30 was what most everything came with back then and they weren't grabbing bearings, even in extremely cold temps.
I don't know what caused his issue, but I highly doubt it was the viscosity of the oil, the lack of full groove bearings, or similar.
Not that I know anything but this is what I was thinking reading through this thread, I'd reject the idea that it was too tight, too thick oil, etc. I'd think it was too out of round, was starved for oil, or simply didn't have .002 clearance... I wouldn't want a 50 weight in an engine with .002 clearance, but people put 50 weight in tight engines all the time. Or engines that they have no idea what the clearances are, factory stuff, etc. I've put 50 weight in old worn out oil burners, who knows what the clearances were, but I wound them up tight and it was never an issue. Maybe they were just loose. But if 50 weight with .002 clearance was an issue that was going to grenade a lot of engines we'd be hearing about it a lot more often...
Last edited by GTX MATT; 03/03/16 12:57 PM.
Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
|
|
|
Re: carnage at the dyno
[Re: 1Fast340]
#2023779
03/03/16 01:06 PM
03/03/16 01:06 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
How comon is it that a bearing/oiling isue tries to pul the pin out of a piston? I cant say that both would even be related .. if the pin doesnt get oil they tend to seize the piston and then end up spinning a bearing ![wave wave](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/custom/wave.gif)
|
|
|
|
|