Gen-3 vs. LSX comparison?
#1965529
12/08/15 01:10 PM
12/08/15 01:10 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206 New York
polyspheric
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York
|
I have a customer who wants to re-power his Fox-body with a "modern" small block. Anyone know of an on-line A > B comparison between Chrysler and GM stock factory engines by cost, weight, durability, parts interchange? Tried searches, nothing good showed up. Thanks!
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: Gen-3 vs. LSX comparison?
[Re: polyspheric]
#1965590
12/08/15 02:35 PM
12/08/15 02:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
|
There is no good news price wise except the Apatche head out flows and out performs most aftermarket LS heads and matches or beats the best LS head depending on whose bench so heads are reasonable. There are no affordable rotating assemblys when you compare us to "them". Not gonna find any swap headers for hemi into a fox, there are more choices for an LS into a fox than you can shake a stick at from mild to wild. 1000 different cheap effective oil pans for LS, very little for the hemi. A good intake for the hemi is $1000 while the LS can have a good intake for EFI or carb around $300.
Bottom line is the heads are KILLER! The price of verything else aournd the hemi is awefull.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
Re: Gen-3 vs. LSX comparison?
[Re: polyspheric]
#1965842
12/08/15 08:28 PM
12/08/15 08:28 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972 Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY
Master
|
Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
|
If he is talking stock... a LS in the fox body is a standard now days.. I have a buddy with one... now he wants to hang a turbo on the stock engine.. which it will do nicely and make close to if not more than a 1000 hp... I thought about going LS in my 38.. but I decided to keep it mopar so I'm going gen 3 but I MIGHT hang a turbo on it.. just for fun EDIT The LS is lighter than the gen 3.. cost seems to be close or the LS might be a bit cheaper.. the LS has way more parts to be had
Last edited by MR_P_BODY; 12/08/15 08:30 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Gen-3 vs. LSX comparison?
[Re: polyspheric]
#1965843
12/08/15 08:29 PM
12/08/15 08:29 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206 New York
polyspheric
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,206
New York
|
Thanks, that's about what I heard. I'm sure the prices will come down a bit with higher sales volume.
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: Gen-3 vs. LSX comparison?
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1966631
12/09/15 11:02 PM
12/09/15 11:02 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267 North, Alabama
D-50
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267
North, Alabama
|
If he is talking stock... a LS in the fox body is a standard now days.. I have a buddy with one... now he wants to hang a turbo on the stock engine.. which it will do nicely and make close to if not more than a 1000 hp... I thought about going LS in my 38.. but I decided to keep it mopar so I'm going gen 3 but I MIGHT hang a turbo on it.. just for fun EDIT The LS is lighter than the gen 3.. cost seems to be close or the LS might be a bit cheaper.. the LS has way more parts to be had A friend of mine has a well set up mustang that he put a stock bottom end LS in with a 88 mm turbo and it threw a rod out of the side of the block on the 2nd 1/8 mile pass. It ran a 7.09 on the first pass.
1.33 60 ft,6.21 at 110.59 in the 1/8, pump gas small block,2950lbs,drag radials,mufflers and driven to track ...
|
|
|
Re: Gen-3 vs. LSX comparison?
[Re: polyspheric]
#1973226
12/20/15 01:50 PM
12/20/15 01:50 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
Even CNC ported they dont have anything over an Apache.
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
Re: Gen-3 vs. LSX comparison?
[Re: polyspheric]
#1973264
12/20/15 03:10 PM
12/20/15 03:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,255 Canada
WO23Coronet
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,255
Canada
|
Just to clarify I've got no issues with an LS, they're a great platform, and sometimes I wish I was a GM guy by how cheap they are, but I'm not. Charger453 it's kind of funny how you're pushing the LS platform based on price when you've built a Mopar to begin with ($) with a big block ($$) (turbocharged right? $$$) in a 2nd gen Charger ($$$$), there's nothing cheap with he path you chosen, and I'm guessing you chose the obviously expensive route because you like Mopars. If it was all about price you would've/should've done a Chevy. You'd have to be living under a rock to not figure out an LS is cheaper, just like 20 yrs ago comparing a 350 to a 340/360, but thankfully Mopar guys chose to build 340's because they liked them better, and because they're a better engine, like a HEMI is better than an LS
Last edited by WO23Coronet; 12/20/15 05:15 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Gen-3 vs. LSX comparison?
[Re: polyspheric]
#1973331
12/20/15 04:57 PM
12/20/15 04:57 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 867 Bellevue, NE
Charger453
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 867
Bellevue, NE
|
Well, I consider myself an enthusiast rather than a Mopar guy. I realize what an Apache flows so I guess I should have been more clear in why I posted that. Last I knew, Apaches were going up in price and unless you want to notch the bores on a 5.7, you need an expensive 6.1 or 6.4. You won't get one of your 390 cfm Apache heads new for $1200. The LS3 will bolt onto any 6.0 which can be had for $1500 or less for a longblock, $1000 or less for a shortblock. He's asking for a Fox body, not a Mopar. For that build, I would most certainly push the LS.
Since you asked about my car, between friends and family, we did the work. It doesn't have a turbo. AND if my Charger were to get a modern engine, it'd be an LS. Both can be great engines, but it's all about availability, affordability, and aftermarket support for me.
|
|
|
Re: Gen-3 vs. LSX comparison?
[Re: Charger453]
#1973370
12/20/15 06:20 PM
12/20/15 06:20 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,776 Ontario Canada
MattW
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,776
Ontario Canada
|
Maybe someone has done it. When I was considering a Gen3 Hemi a while back, the consensus was that the bores needed to be notched. I'm not here to argue as I know how some Mopar guys are hard-headed when it comes to giving credit to any other brand, and that's not directed towards anyone in this thread. I just know what it will turn into once this gets some views. Let's face it... if the Hemi stock bottom end could handle any sort of boost, they would be a lot more popular. They have been put into damn near every production vehicle like the LS so they're plentiful. They are an excellent design. You're just not able to put 700-800+ HP to the stock internals like an LS. Stock 5.7 bore stock Apache head.
|
|
|
|
|