A body K frame?
#1946921
11/07/15 01:21 PM
11/07/15 01:21 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,496 STL
cdstl
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,496
STL
|
A guy has this setup on Craigs and claims that it comes out of a 72 A body. I am interested in it for the sway bar LCAs and sway bar. I haven't heard back from him yet but what do you guys think, does it look A body? Craigs Link http://indianapolis.craigslist.org/pts/5261281991.html
1972 Cuda 340 4 speed, 2001 Ram CTD 4x4 6 speed, 1970 Duster 408 4 speed, 1996 Ram 5.9 2x4 auto, 1965 Coronet 500
|
|
|
Re: A body K frame?
[Re: cdstl]
#1946943
11/07/15 01:42 PM
11/07/15 01:42 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,496 STL
cdstl
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,496
STL
|
Ok thanks for the fast replies. I would probably only use the LCAs and sway bar brackets. Would this setup transfer to a 70 Duster V8 K frame? I've no idea where the sway bar brackets would mount on my car. Do they bolt to the K frame like this one?
Thanks
1972 Cuda 340 4 speed, 2001 Ram CTD 4x4 6 speed, 1970 Duster 408 4 speed, 1996 Ram 5.9 2x4 auto, 1965 Coronet 500
|
|
|
Re: A body K frame?
[Re: cdstl]
#1946986
11/07/15 02:42 PM
11/07/15 02:42 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,496 STL
cdstl
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,496
STL
|
Yep, I figured out it was a '73 and up. I may pick it up. We'll see. It has different motor mounts than mine and that means searching for more stuff.
1972 Cuda 340 4 speed, 2001 Ram CTD 4x4 6 speed, 1970 Duster 408 4 speed, 1996 Ram 5.9 2x4 auto, 1965 Coronet 500
|
|
|
Re: A body K frame?
[Re: cdstl]
#1947008
11/07/15 03:35 PM
11/07/15 03:35 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Not a real big search required, only thing you need is the 73 and up mounts available just about anywhere just about every RWD pass car that Chrysler made with a 318 from 1973 till 1989 used them. Rockauto lists them, for dirt cheap but I'd not use Anchor brand, too much junk. I also fill the voids in the rubber with black RTV, but that's just me.
Napa lists them.
Autozone lists them.
Last edited by Supercuda; 11/07/15 03:37 PM.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: A body K frame?
[Re: Supercuda]
#1947130
11/07/15 07:51 PM
11/07/15 07:51 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,496 STL
cdstl
OP
pro stock
|
OP
pro stock
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,496
STL
|
Yep, I saw them after I posted. Does the steering box bolt in the same way/position as on the 70?
I have to ask even though I'm sure that they are the same.
Thanks again
1972 Cuda 340 4 speed, 2001 Ram CTD 4x4 6 speed, 1970 Duster 408 4 speed, 1996 Ram 5.9 2x4 auto, 1965 Coronet 500
|
|
|
Re: A body K frame?
[Re: cdstl]
#1947204
11/07/15 09:09 PM
11/07/15 09:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,319 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,319
Oregon
|
I have a set of poly SB mounts for sale on the board. These would be all you need to change over to the late model K frame.
Last edited by AndyF; 11/07/15 09:09 PM.
|
|
|
Re: A body K frame?
[Re: cdstl]
#1947208
11/07/15 09:13 PM
11/07/15 09:13 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
May (or may not) need the '73 up PS pitman arm if going with PS
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: A body K frame?
[Re: RapidRobert]
#1947267
11/07/15 10:46 PM
11/07/15 10:46 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
May (or may not) need the '73 up PS pitman arm if going with PS Yep, will need the later pitman arm regardless, the tapered stud that connects to the center link points opposite than the 72 style. The 72 style points up, the 73 points down. Again, rockauto shows both the 73 style manual and power pitman arms listed in Moog.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: A body K frame?
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1947289
11/07/15 11:04 PM
11/07/15 11:04 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
Oh, the first way to visually determine if the K is from an A or a B/E body? Look along the front edge of the K, nearest the radiator. The A body versions are straight, the B/E are curved. good info & I can see the straight edge on the front of the K in the pic
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: A body K frame?
[Re: Kern Dog]
#1947507
11/08/15 01:08 PM
11/08/15 01:08 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
|
the tapered (idler/pitman) studs point down on 64-66 A and up on 67-72 A then what Supercuda said, down on 73-76 A. Even tho a /6 and V8 centerlink is the same in 67-72 and 73-76 (tho different from each other in the two different year groupings) reportedly using a 73 up centerlink gives a slight bit more pan clearance in a tight app & you would need the appropriate idle/pitman arms whose tapered studs go in the centerlink from the top. the outside outer tie rod ends (the holes) are turned 90 deg (not sure why Ma did that) but does not affect swapability afaik cuz it is out on the ends. EDIT I'm remembering something about the 67 only idler & how it mounted in the kmember, that end of it, something about a 1 off deal
Last edited by RapidRobert; 11/08/15 01:11 PM.
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
|
|