Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1893626
08/17/15 04:17 PM
08/17/15 04:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
I think you need a trip to Las Vegas but hey that's just me smile No fishing but plenty of fish to eat, some of the best restaurants in the world here.

Sorry for the plug now back to your regularly scheduled post smile


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1893628
08/17/15 04:18 PM
08/17/15 04:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
Oh yeah there is a TON of flex on a std size cam core at 900lbs..It is exponential from 600 to 900


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1893662
08/17/15 04:53 PM
08/17/15 04:53 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,664
North Sweden
R
RT540 Offline OP
top fuel
RT540  Offline OP
top fuel
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,664
North Sweden
A trip to LAS Vegas would be awesome, i am a gambler, but just small change.

Regarding deflection, a simple beam calculation would be easy to do, you just have take some measurements

Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1893854
08/17/15 08:49 PM
08/17/15 08:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 137
Daytona Beach, FL
C
cknight Offline
member
cknight  Offline
member
C

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 137
Daytona Beach, FL
Originally Posted By RT540
Lets say you have 900pounds full lift and maybe 550-600 at half lift an still have a 002 differens, I would think that the force at half lift will have the cam at the same excentric place wiith zero clearance. And that the cam core do flex between bearings.


Yes, flex is an issue. When rotated 720 degrees, the cam should be located in the same eccentric position as before. I was referring to the comment on the base circle dip (or "lash increase")as the engine is being turned over. You can see similar results with 300 pounds open, where flex is lees of a factor. Regards, Chase

Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: cknight] #1893864
08/17/15 09:03 PM
08/17/15 09:03 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,969
Chandler, AZ
Duner Offline
top fuel
Duner  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,969
Chandler, AZ
Does some of the flex seen while rotating slowly - go away at RPM?

I wouldn't expect a camshaft to put up with millions of cycles of flexing like that if it were very much. But then again, I have no first hand experience to know any different either.

Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1893960
08/17/15 10:23 PM
08/17/15 10:23 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
C
camastomcat Offline
top fuel
camastomcat  Offline
top fuel
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
It gets worse. But what do I know?

Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: cknight] #1894145
08/18/15 02:26 AM
08/18/15 02:26 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
Originally Posted By cknight
Originally Posted By ChevyTS
I sympathize with the tech line guys. I'm sure they answer a million simple questions a week. I would think that they would look forward to a difficult problem once in a while. Comp tech guys should have known that I was describing lateral cam deflection. My question to them was " is the cam lobe ground to increase lash a few degrees before the valve starts to open". After I thought about the problem for a while it made perfect sense to me. Now the big question! What can I do about it? I guess we have to say thank goodness for Moparts tech forum. wink


Flex can be an issue, but with conventional cam bearings, you may have .0015" to .0025" cam to bearing clearance. This causes the camshaft to "rattle" around while being turned over slowly, due to the pressure exerted by each of the open valves. Depending on the particular journal clearance and rocker ratio, this can change the lash from .002" to .004". This is what usually causes the apparent dip in the lobe's base circle when checking an assembled engine. Regards, Chase
Thank you for your reply. With the intake off of the engine today, I rotated the cam until the intake lobe was 180 degree from the lifter and checked the lash. Exactly .009 Then I rotated the engine until the exhaust valve was almost full lift and could see that the intake was still on the base circle (at this point I guess) and checked again. .029 Using a dial indicator I checked rocker shaft flex and found .006 ish . I indicated off of the cam between the lobes and found about .002 flex. Even taking the 1.7 ratio into consideration I still can't see where the extra lash is coming from.


T & K Performance
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1894655
08/18/15 06:58 PM
08/18/15 06:58 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas


T & K Performance
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1894664
08/18/15 07:10 PM
08/18/15 07:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
Typical common shaft Dodge stuff. Been trying to tell ya smile Kinda why we don't run them(any common shaft set up)on serious stuff.

Also think some are way overthinking some of this. This is nothing new and is an issue with common shaft rocker set ups. Now try it with a set of Crane gold shafts


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1894668
08/18/15 07:17 PM
08/18/15 07:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
Better or worse?


T & K Performance
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1894670
08/18/15 07:18 PM
08/18/15 07:18 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
I'm assuming worse.


T & K Performance
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1894672
08/18/15 07:21 PM
08/18/15 07:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
From my experience worse


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1894840
08/18/15 10:10 PM
08/18/15 10:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,270
fredericksburg,va
C
cudaman1969 Offline
master
cudaman1969  Offline
master
C

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,270
fredericksburg,va
Why not set all intakes and then exhaust to a certain lift ( measuring with a dial gauge off retainer) and not worry about how much lash or flex you have. Getting a base measurement first of course. It would be interesting to see if there is a difference between them. Running would be a whole nuther ball game, getting a stable valve train at speed will never happen. IMO everyone is wasting air, like the pinion angle affair.

Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1894921
08/18/15 11:06 PM
08/18/15 11:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,027
Tulsa OK
Bad340fish Offline
master
Bad340fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,027
Tulsa OK
Are just assuming the cam companies have no idea about this valve train flex and do not account for it in the lash numbers? I would ASSume they know about, and they recommend what they do for a good reason.


68 Barracuda Formula S 340
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: Bad340fish] #1895068
08/19/15 01:33 AM
08/19/15 01:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
Four guys at Comp sure didn't seem to know what I was talking about. I need someone to explain to me that increasing lash just before the valve opens is a good idea. All of the boasting that cam manufactures do about how awesome their lobe technology is and for what? To plop the valve open when all of the slack is taken up. No misery why racers are complaining about breaking B1 rockers all of the time. Might as well open the valve with an air hammer! wink


T & K Performance
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1895077
08/19/15 01:46 AM
08/19/15 01:46 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
And increasing the lash before opening the valve might very well be intentional. If so great. But I will need some one to explain it to me very slowly. smile


T & K Performance
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: ChevyTS] #1895079
08/19/15 01:47 AM
08/19/15 01:47 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
C
camastomcat Offline
top fuel
camastomcat  Offline
top fuel
C

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,128
Salt Lake City
I ran B1's for 13 years. Once everything was right, I didn't have anymore valve train issues. I'm not sure why you are having these issues, and to be honest, I never checked intake valve lash with the exhaust at high lift. I ran the single shaft T&D rockers, Koffel black rockers, and common shaft T&D rockers. Never broke a rocker. I also cycled them out after 500 or so runs. You might try calling a long time custom cam grinder like Ken Heard. He owns Oregon Cam, and has been grinding custom cams for me for the last few years.
www.oregoncamshaft.com

Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: camastomcat] #1895085
08/19/15 01:57 AM
08/19/15 01:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
Originally Posted By camastomcat
I ran B1's for 13 years. Once everything was right, I didn't have anymore valve train issues. I'm not sure why you are having these issues, and to be honest, I never checked intake valve lash with the exhaust at high lift. I ran the single shaft T&D rockers, Koffel black rockers, and common shaft T&D rockers. Never broke a rocker. I also cycled them out after 500 or so runs. You might try calling a long time custom cam grinder like Ken Heard. He owns Oregon Cam, and has been grinding custom cams for me for the last few years.
www.oregoncamshaft.com
Thanks for the information. I will give him a call. We haven't broken a T&D rocker yet and I want to keep it that way. wink


T & K Performance
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: RT540] #1895118
08/19/15 03:52 AM
08/19/15 03:52 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
Al_Alguire Offline
I Live Here
Al_Alguire  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,363
Las Vegas
I have never broken a B1 rocker either. Common shaft or paired shaft. Key is to use the right parts for the job. Most Mopar guys don't wanna spend the money to go fast and step up to better pieces for what they are trying to do. Then they wonder why someone's combo runs better than theirs does. Just my .02


"I am not ashamed to confess I am ignorant of what I do not know."

"It's never wrong to do the right thing"
Re: Setting valve lash at base circle with EOIC, weird result?? [Re: Al_Alguire] #1895276
08/19/15 12:27 PM
08/19/15 12:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
Odd. Everyone I know that runs B1 heads (or other brands) complain about their rockers and carry spares. I will figure out the problem. I feel that the point has shifted to attacking the messenger and not the message. Thanks though wink


T & K Performance
Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1