|
Re: transmission pan
[Re: 17dodgebros]
#1733395
01/19/15 12:21 AM
01/19/15 12:21 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
Mancini jegs etc have spacers for I'd think a pan of a certain increased depth but first I'd find out if the 2000 ram 727 uses a spacer (& I'm assuming the height of the VB is the same in all 727's) cuz as you know it's the depth that you are concerned with. What has got you interested in possibly using this pan, is it deeper than the normal 727 pans (I'm assuming yes)
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
Re: transmission pan
[Re: BrianT]
#1733397
01/19/15 01:59 PM
01/19/15 01:59 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040 Lincoln Nebraska
RapidRobert
Circle Track
|
Circle Track
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,040
Lincoln Nebraska
|
I would think if you used a deeper pan WO a spacer block that if you filled the fluid up to where it would be with the original pan (read correct on the stick) that when it started pumping, the fluid level with the deep pan would drop below the filter the same as it would with the OE pan cuz the filter ain't extended down/submerged further into the fluid which I think would be needed to take advantage of the extra fluid depth. My point being, with a deep pan dont you need the filter submerged further down into the fluid? (with the spacer). Just thinking out loud before my coffee is ready
live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
|
|
|
|
|
|