Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
#1712452
12/18/14 05:02 PM
12/18/14 05:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,024 Morningside
AdventurerSport
OP
waaaay out there in left field
|
OP
waaaay out there in left field
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,024
Morningside
|
Thinking about adding a Mopar CAI to my 2011 Ram 1500. I have the CAI on my Mopar '10 Challenger and I like the looks and sound, thinking that I would like to do this upgrade to my Ram as well.
Mopar Performance claims 10hp increase as well as an increase in gas mileage. Just wondering if anyone has done that and is there a true advantage or just hype? Just curious as to whether it's worth the price...thanks!
JS
76 Dodge Adventurer Sport Power Wagon W100 318, 727, NP203 Fulltime 4x4 Russet Red 06 Jeep Commander Ltd 4x4, 5.7L Hemi, QuadraDrive II 06 Chrysler 300C AWD 5.7L Hemi 10 Mopar 10 Challenger R/T, #483/500, 5.7L HEMI 10 Jeep Grand Cherokee Ltd 4x4 5.7L HEMI 11 Dodge Ram 1500 LoneStar Quad Cab, 5.7L HEMI, Fulltime 4x4, Deep Cherry Red 16 Jeep Cherokee Limited 3.2L Pentastar V6, 9 Speed Torqueflite, 4x4, Black
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: AdventurerSport]
#1712455
12/19/14 12:20 AM
12/19/14 12:20 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,562 Rittman Ohio
fourgearsavoy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,562
Rittman Ohio
|
My I have seen all types of cold air intakes and NONE of them sealed the hot air away from the inlet as good as the factory unit does. The oiled K&N type filters release a residue that builds up on the mass airflow sensor electrodes and your fuel mileage may actually suffer and outweigh any performance gains you might see. I have only seen one that looked like it would work and the customer said he paid over $650.00 for the system hardly seems worth it to me Gus
64 Plymouth Savoy 493 Indy EZ's by Nick at Compu-Flow 5-Speed Richmond faceplate Liberty box Dana 60
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: fourgearsavoy]
#1712456
12/19/14 02:08 PM
12/19/14 02:08 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,021 Salem
Grizzly
Moparts Proctologist
|
Moparts Proctologist
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,021
Salem
|
For years now some people ignore the fact that the factory air intakes already draw cold air from inside the fender or front bumper area. It's hype. The proper term is "hot air" kit, which is obvious in this image: All the heat from the rad, exhaust manifolds, and engine block rise (Grade 5 Science class), stay below the hood, and all get funneled into this sorry excuse for hot-rodding:
Last edited by Grizzly; 12/19/14 02:24 PM.
Mo' Farts
Moderated by "tbagger".
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: Grizzly]
#1712457
12/19/14 02:13 PM
12/19/14 02:13 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,021 Salem
Grizzly
Moparts Proctologist
|
Moparts Proctologist
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,021
Salem
|
But, leave it to Chrysler Engineers to recognize people are actually stupid enough to fall for this contraption, so, they made up one of their own...........and it's even WORSE! I think it's like another *edit* $2600.00 or something...........to make your car slower.
Last edited by Grizzly; 12/19/14 03:08 PM.
Mo' Farts
Moderated by "tbagger".
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: 360view]
#1712460
12/19/14 06:17 PM
12/19/14 06:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,424 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,424
Kalispell Mt.
|
I expect most gains from "cold air intakes" are actually from a design that flows better. A better term may be "high flow intake" as the factory ones are often compromises in cost, noise, packaging... I think the main reason they grab air from the fender is it is cooler and quieter but the hole is often smaller than the throttle body. The fender probably does not have as much air pressure building in it going down the highway as under the hood so there is probably a small gain from that. The factory likes accordions for convenience both on install and design and they don't tend to flow as well as a smooth wall tube.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: HotRodDave]
#1712461
12/19/14 06:49 PM
12/19/14 06:49 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 416 Georgia
KingTuna
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 416
Georgia
|
I have a K&N short ram intake on my 14 Challenger R/T. I also have a OBD2 bluetooth adapter that I use with the Torque app on my phone. I did a test of before the K&N and after, and the results were pretty close. On the highway, both air filters pulled air in that ranged from 2 to 5 degrees higher than the ambient air temperature. While sitting at a red light, or in traffic, the short ram did reach higher temperatures compared to the stock box. As far as airflow, you can tell the difference. The car pulls harder at higher rpms, where the stock box was restrictive. If living in areas where you have lots of traffic, I would actually get a cai that connects to the hole in the fender similar to a stock box. As far as HP gains manufacturer's claim, I think you might get that much of an improvement on a good day, with nice cool air, with the vehicle at proper running temp.
As far as the oil goes, I have heard people say that for years. I have used K&N filters since my first car, and I have put them in my parents vehicles also. As long as you oil the filter like you are supposed to, and let it dry a few hours before re-installing, you should have no issues. If you are heavy handed on the oil, you could have issues. Some people often think they know better than the directions...
2014 Ram 1500 Pentastar V6 1966 Fury II 4 door
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: fourgearsavoy]
#1712462
12/19/14 09:04 PM
12/19/14 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,968 WI
Dcuda69
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,968
WI
|
Quote:
My I have seen all types of cold air intakes and NONE of them sealed the hot air away from the inlet as good as the factory unit does. The oiled K&N type filters release a residue that builds up on the mass airflow sensor electrodes and your fuel mileage may actually suffer and outweigh any performance gains you might see. I have only seen one that looked like it would work and the customer said he paid over $650.00 for the system hardly seems worth it to me Gus
100% A LOT of manufactures have released TSB's in regards to aftermarket oil type air filters and MAF problems!!
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: Dcuda69]
#1712463
12/19/14 09:42 PM
12/19/14 09:42 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,495 Western Colorado High Desert
moparmarks
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,495
Western Colorado High Desert
|
I've had a K&N setup on my 97 5.2 Dakota for over 260,000 miles and have never had any problems with the MAP or TB or anything else. Get around 20mpg hwy. and 16 city. The biggest gain is with a smooth tube versa a rippled one.
72 Satellite Sebring Plus 440, 72 Dart 5.9 4-spd, 68 Valiant, 73 W200, 78 D100 sb, 78 D200, 98 DAKOTA, . Moparmarks Parts & Restorations Desert Mopar Metal Grand Jct. CO 970-261-7039 http://moparmark.com/motormangj@gmail.com
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: Supercuda]
#1712465
12/20/14 12:34 AM
12/20/14 12:34 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,495 Western Colorado High Desert
moparmarks
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 12,495
Western Colorado High Desert
|
Quote:
Quote:
I've had a K&N setup on my 97 5.2 Dakota for over 260,000 miles and have never had any problems with the MAP or TB or anything else. Get around 20mpg hwy. and 16 city. The biggest gain is with a smooth tube versa a rippled one.
It's not the MAP sensor, it's the MAF sensor that's an issue. You Dak didn't use one, it's an either or situation.
True, mine has a MAP and not a MAF.
72 Satellite Sebring Plus 440, 72 Dart 5.9 4-spd, 68 Valiant, 73 W200, 78 D100 sb, 78 D200, 98 DAKOTA, . Moparmarks Parts & Restorations Desert Mopar Metal Grand Jct. CO 970-261-7039 http://moparmark.com/motormangj@gmail.com
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: moparmarks]
#1712466
12/20/14 12:43 AM
12/20/14 12:43 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889 up yours
Supercuda
About to go away
|
About to go away
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
|
Reason the MAF sensor is an issue is that this type of setup uses a heated wire in the intake air stream to measure air flow, the oil coats it and renders it useless. Suggested fix is replacement, not cleaning of the MAF. Hence manufacturers that use this system will not warranty your MAF if you use an oiled air filter, regardless of the amount of oil on it.
MAP sensor just measures intake vacuum and infers the air flow (real simplified explanation). That sensor never sees oil from the filter.
They say there are no such thing as a stupid question. They say there is always the exception that proves the rule. Don't be the exception.
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: 360view]
#1712467
12/20/14 09:37 AM
12/20/14 09:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162 USA
360view
Moparts resident spammer
|
Moparts resident spammer
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
|
if you want the coolest air available the experiments are clear: the hottest air is near the dark sun heated pavement and the coolest air is high up. the difference changes with the season but can be 20 degrees even in winter many highway transportation departments monitor this http://rwis.kytc.ky.gov/maps/tempmap2.htmthere are similar results for the cleanliness of the air versus height above pavement as with other small changes less than 5% only a two vehicle "convoy" style test called a SAE/TMC Type IV can reliably detect air intake differences
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: Grizzly]
#1712469
12/20/14 04:13 PM
12/20/14 04:13 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 71 Sudbury, ontario canada
750-h2
member
|
member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 71
Sudbury, ontario canada
|
Quote:
But, leave it to Chrysler Engineers to recognize people are actually stupid enough to fall for this contraption, so, they made up one of their own...........and it's even WORSE! I think it's like another *edit* $2600.00 or something...........to make your car slower.
You couldn't be more incorrect on the factory Mopar Shaker. It draws zero air from the engine compartment. The air box is like the stock setup and draws outside cold air through the bottom of the box. But unlike the stock box it also draws cold outside air through the Shaker inlet tube. The top of the air box is sealed by the hood except for a small cut out at the front draws cold air from the front of the moving vehicle. Very nice setup!!
|
|
|
Re: Advantages of the Cold Air Intake? 2011 Ram 5.7L
[Re: Grizzly]
#1712470
12/20/14 05:39 PM
12/20/14 05:39 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Quote:
For years now some people ignore the fact that the factory air intakes already draw cold air from inside the fender or front bumper area.
And at speed on the highway, the fender is a high pressure zone
With the low throttle openings at cruise I fail to see how a better flowing intake or a smooth tube will improve MPG at all. When intake draw is so low, how much flow do you need? This is like the teeny boppers putting huge cone filters on their civics and seeing no improvement. On a v8 I could see the an aftermarket air intake offering some improvement as the factory ones tend to be designed as a compromise between performance and noise. But even then, I doubt they are designed that bad.
|
|
|
|
|