Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? #1666411
09/02/14 03:44 AM
09/02/14 03:44 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 673
Emmett, Idaho
S
SuperStockWagon Offline OP
mopar
SuperStockWagon  Offline OP
mopar
S

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 673
Emmett, Idaho
Ok you guys/gals that own or have owned 5.2 Durango's..Will a 98 Durango with a 5.2 get 15-18mpg highway if driven 60-65mph?

Not sure yet but think it has 3.55s with 31/10.50/15's and is 100% stock.. also it has the select-trac 242 t-case.


NHRA Stock/SuperStock Class Racing..Engineered Muscle In Motion!
Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: SuperStockWagon] #1666412
09/02/14 01:47 PM
09/02/14 01:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 546
Gilman, IA
sabbfan Offline
mopar
sabbfan  Offline
mopar

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 546
Gilman, IA
It should, I had a similar year Durango with the 5.9 and got around 16 with it.


2012 Ram 2500 Crew Cab 4x4 5.7 Hemi
2011 Dodge Durango 3.6L
2009 Dodge Caliber 1.8L 5 speed
1970 Super Bee-someday!
Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: SuperStockWagon] #1666413
09/02/14 02:31 PM
09/02/14 02:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Probably get 17 or 18 with the cruise set on 65 on level ground.

Switch to a 235 75 15 tire will help a lot and be cheaper to buy, those 31-10.50 make a lot of drag.

Get a set of the orange 4.6 ford fuel injectors at the JY for a little MPG bump.

a 205 t-stat helps.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: HotRodDave] #1666414
09/02/14 04:55 PM
09/02/14 04:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 673
Emmett, Idaho
S
SuperStockWagon Offline OP
mopar
SuperStockWagon  Offline OP
mopar
S

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 673
Emmett, Idaho
Thanks guys..hoping it has 3.92's with the 31 10.50's,if it has 3.55's will switch to smaller tire. Its going to be mainly used in town shuttling kids.


NHRA Stock/SuperStock Class Racing..Engineered Muscle In Motion!
Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: SuperStockWagon] #1666415
09/02/14 05:28 PM
09/02/14 05:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
The 3.92 and big tires really put a hit on the mpg. It is the width of the tire more than the height. I never realized it till pushing my wifes around the shop, waaaay harder to push with the wide ones when the steering wheel is turned even a little bit, even straight pushing it was noticably harder. I have owned and driven several of them and trust me you do not want the 3.92 even for town driving, the performance difference is almost imperceptible. A 318 with a 44re and 3.55s is faster than the R/T I have now.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: SuperStockWagon] #1666416
09/02/14 07:25 PM
09/02/14 07:25 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,054
N.W. Florida
F
Fat_Mike Offline
master
Fat_Mike  Offline
master
F

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,054
N.W. Florida
A 4X4 might get 15 MPG, but I wouldn't bet on anything above that. Edit: Don't be surprised if you get slightly less...

Last edited by Fat_Mike; 09/02/14 07:27 PM.
Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: Fat_Mike] #1666417
09/02/14 08:57 PM
09/02/14 08:57 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,049
ohio
A
all spooled up Offline
super stock
all spooled up  Offline
super stock
A

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,049
ohio
my 2000 5.9 4x4 3.55 gears 31/10.5 tires has got 19 mpg on flat land at 65 mph and has 190.000 miles on her.

Last edited by all spooled up; 09/02/14 08:58 PM.
Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: all spooled up] #1666418
09/02/14 11:28 PM
09/02/14 11:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
I got 15-17 real world with a 5.9/3.55 and stock tires. Highway miles were at 70+ so you should do better with a 5.2 driven easy (and stockish tires).

Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: ahy] #1666419
09/03/14 12:32 AM
09/03/14 12:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,559
Freeport IL USA
poorboy Offline
I Live Here
poorboy  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,559
Freeport IL USA
It might get 15-18 on the highway, but around town, hauling kids from point a to point b, expect 10 mpg, maybe a little less, and that will depend hugely on how its driven. That is a lot of mass to get rolling after the stop light, every other block. Gene

Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: poorboy] #1666420
09/03/14 01:38 AM
09/03/14 01:38 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,319
Chicago Burbs
sthemi Offline
master
sthemi  Offline
master

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,319
Chicago Burbs
Yes,
the around town stuff is the killer, Highway should be in the 14-15 range.
If around town shuffling the kids is what you intend to do, buy a minivan, neon or PT Cruiser..

Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: poorboy] #1666421
09/03/14 03:06 PM
09/03/14 03:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
H
HotRodDave Offline
I Live Here
HotRodDave  Offline
I Live Here
H

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
Quote:

It might get 15-18 on the highway, but around town, hauling kids from point a to point b, expect 10 mpg, maybe a little less, and that will depend hugely on how its driven. That is a lot of mass to get rolling after the stop light, every other block. Gene




Very true, my wife would get 8 mpg average in her 2000 5.9 with 3.92 (not R/T) while I would get consistent 16.5 every time I drove it.


I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!



Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: HotRodDave] #1666422
09/03/14 06:22 PM
09/03/14 06:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,072
Niles , Ohio
T
therocks Offline
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
therocks  Offline
oh wait.but hey.lets see.oh yeah.
T

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,072
Niles , Ohio
My 99 5.9 got about 11 or so in town.Highway I would get about 16 to 17.Now when the wife drove it was lucky to get 8 in town.Rocky


Chrysler Firepower
Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: therocks] #1666423
09/03/14 11:56 PM
09/03/14 11:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,930
Waynesboro PA 17268
R
RODHALL Offline
master
RODHALL  Offline
master
R

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,930
Waynesboro PA 17268
depends on how it is driven... heavy right foot, always panic stopping... 8-10 would be my guess.. easy on the gas, able to let it roll into corners and stops, not jerking it all over the road... 16-18 maybe even 19 or 20 could be had...

Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: SuperStockWagon] #1666424
09/04/14 08:21 AM
09/04/14 08:21 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
IIRC Popular Mechanics magazine published an owners survey of Durango owners back in the late 1990s, and the 5.2 got 0.75 MPG better than the 5.9 V8. I believe both were in the 13's.

I also seem to remember that the 5.2 V8 version of the Jeep Grand Cherokee in the PM survey was reported by owners as getting about 2 MPG better than the 5.2 Durango.

I wondered why?
Was it weight, aero, 4wd desgn, JTEC software, etc

Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: RODHALL] #1666425
09/04/14 09:33 AM
09/04/14 09:33 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,327
Toronto (YYZ) Ontario
YYZ Offline
master
YYZ  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,327
Toronto (YYZ) Ontario
Quote:

depends on how it is driven... heavy right foot, always panic stopping... 8-10 would be my guess.. easy on the gas, able to let it roll into corners and stops, not jerking it all over the road... 16-18 maybe even 19 or 20 could be had...




That's about right.

Points of comparison are a pair of '99s - my buddy's 5.2/4WD/3.92s that he bought new (and still has) and my former 5.9/4WD/3.55s

Mileage was worse with 235/75/15 snows than with the 31s - an upgrade to the later 16" rims with a narrow tread and low rolling resistance tire would probably help.

The Durangos are heavy - 5500# IIRC and larger than the Grand Cherokees. Though for whatever reason they seem to be disproportionately hard on fuel for what they are.

Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: YYZ] #1666426
09/04/14 12:32 PM
09/04/14 12:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,131
Amarillo, Texas
BBR Offline
master
BBR  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,131
Amarillo, Texas
My '98 5.2/4x4/SLT/3.55/235/75-15 tires weighs 4800lbs according to the grain scale. 157k miles, bought new in 98.

Gets 11-12 in town and at 70mph, 18mpg. Slow it down to 60 and I have been over 20mpg with it.


Drag Week 2011 - 77th place - DD
Drag Week 2012 - 2nd place SRBB N/A
Drag Week 2014 - Kapooya
RMRW 2018
RMRW 2020
Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: HotRodDave] #1666427
09/04/14 11:09 PM
09/04/14 11:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,562
Manistee, Michigan.
High Impact Offline
pro stock
High Impact  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,562
Manistee, Michigan.
Quote:

Probably get 17 or 18 with the cruise set on 65 on level ground.

Switch to a 235 75 15 tire will help a lot and be cheaper to buy, those 31-10.50 make a lot of drag.

Get a set of the orange 4.6 ford fuel injectors at the JY for a little MPG bump.

a 205 t-stat helps.




Tell me more about these injector's and why it would be better. I imagine you've tried it so what was the out come??

I just bought a beautiful 99 Durango with 66,000 miles and a seized up engine. Not sure why it seized on the people but Im gonna be replacing it with a low mileage 5.2 from a 97 Dodge truck. I already replaced the upper intake gaskets so that's done and im gonna pull the pan to make sure its sludge free and probably install a new oil pump for cheap insurance but wondered about what else I should do to make it better.

8261448-Picture075.jpg (171 downloads)
Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: High Impact] #1666428
09/05/14 11:56 AM
09/05/14 11:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,582
Rust Belt, SW PA
Silver70 Offline
I Live Here
Silver70  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 18,582
Rust Belt, SW PA
I averaged 18 in mine, not highway, just mostly local and shorter trips.


68 Road Runner, 69 Belvedere, 71 Challenger Vert
340 barracuda, 01 Ram CTD, 95 Ram, 04 Ram, 85 Daytona turbo Z
66 GTO, 06 Magnum RT AWD. 07 Ram CTD, 07 Ram
Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: High Impact] #1666429
09/06/14 09:30 AM
09/06/14 09:30 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
3
360view Offline
Moparts resident spammer
360view  Offline
Moparts resident spammer
3

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,162
USA
If the engine is out of the vehicle consider milling the cylinder head and block to get the quench clearance to 0.040 inches or better, and the static compression ratio to 10.5 or better.

Going from a "real world" compression ratio of 8.8 ( versus nominal 9.1)
to true 10.5 should improve fuel economy in both city and highway by 8% or more

Re: Real World MPG 98 Durango 5.2 ? [Re: High Impact] #1666430
09/06/14 09:50 AM
09/06/14 09:50 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,327
Toronto (YYZ) Ontario
YYZ Offline
master
YYZ  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,327
Toronto (YYZ) Ontario
Quote:

Quote:

Probably get 17 or 18 with the cruise set on 65 on level ground.

Switch to a 235 75 15 tire will help a lot and be cheaper to buy, those 31-10.50 make a lot of drag.

Get a set of the orange 4.6 ford fuel injectors at the JY for a little MPG bump.

a 205 t-stat helps.




While you have the engine out, it's a good idea to carefully flush the cooling system. That generation of Durango is notorious for clogging up heater cores for whatever reason.

Tell me more about these injector's and why it would be better. I imagine you've tried it so what was the out come??

I just bought a beautiful 99 Durango with 66,000 miles and a seized up engine. Not sure why it seized on the people but Im gonna be replacing it with a low mileage 5.2 from a 97 Dodge truck. I already replaced the upper intake gaskets so that's done and im gonna pull the pan to make sure its sludge free and probably install a new oil pump for cheap insurance but wondered about what else I should do to make it better.



Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1