Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: Quicktree]
#1642409
07/06/14 09:48 AM
07/06/14 09:48 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,325 Truckville, the capital of NY
85_Ram_4speed
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,325
Truckville, the capital of NY
|
Thanks, I will stick with the Scats then, as I have done in the past and will continue to do.
I do think some of you missed the part that where I said it will be essentially a stock rebuild and not raced. This application wont be raced not even a little bit, and should never see over 5000 RPM ---- just my opinion anyhow.
I love how Quicktree never answered my question to his "they suck" statement, LOL.
Outcast Dodge guy.
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: Quicktree]
#1642411
07/06/14 01:08 PM
07/06/14 01:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723 Portage,michigan
B3422W5
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723
Portage,michigan
|
I wouldn't run the Eagle SIR rods but the Scats are 4340 material.
69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight 418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam Best so far, low 10.30’s 1/4 1.41 best 60 foot 6.56 at 104.17
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: Quicktree]
#1642412
07/06/14 01:09 PM
07/06/14 01:09 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,325 Truckville, the capital of NY
85_Ram_4speed
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,325
Truckville, the capital of NY
|
No problem here Quick, sorry if I kinda called you out singlely, but if you go back and read your specific posts, you were pretty vauge on the whole thing---which was why I wanted to know your reasoning. The post right above this actually has more info than your other ones. That's all and it is all good here. Thanks all for the replies, I will use the Scats as I wanted too in the first place. I was just thinking of the guys wallet a little, but I didn't want to sacrifice quality if I could help it.
Outcast Dodge guy.
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: 85_Ram_4speed]
#1642413
07/06/14 01:48 PM
07/06/14 01:48 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,366 Lehigh Acres, Florida
rickstershemi
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9,366
Lehigh Acres, Florida
|
Scat Cast 4" and I-Beams in the 408 I had built and sold.....The guy that bought it beats on it constantly....street / strip and it's still running strong. Not a fan of over-spending when not needed A lot of people cringed when we went with Compstar Components in the 565 as well, but it's still making laps and winning races and spent 2-years in Top Sportsman running 4.70's with a bunch of spray....now it's back in a local index car Rickster
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: Porter67]
#1642415
07/07/14 12:25 AM
07/07/14 12:25 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,421 Toronto
mshred
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,421
Toronto
|
I have never heard anything bad about the Scat I beams, a good rod...the Eagles on the other hand, I have heard of more then enough that you couldn't pay me to run them. Ran a set of Scat I beam rods for an entire season- about 70-80 passes and even more street beatings. When I took them out they were in great shape. I think the Scat's are the way to go in this situation, thats my
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: mshred]
#1642416
07/07/14 09:20 AM
07/07/14 09:20 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,178 Indy
FlyFish
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,178
Indy
|
Scat I-beams in my 410 stroker, 5 years on this build, no problems, mid 10's, driven hard on a regular basis.
67 Barracuda street car, 408, e85, 1.38 60', 6.44 @105.9 in the 1/8 mile, 10.19 @130.5 in the 1/4...so far....
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: Quicktree]
#1642418
07/07/14 10:48 AM
07/07/14 10:48 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723 Portage,michigan
B3422W5
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723
Portage,michigan
|
Quote:
I think most of you are missing the point, what is the cost of I beams? what is the cost of H beams? is it really worth it?
Plenty of high dollar rods are I beam, such as Oliver, etc, etc.
69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight 418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam Best so far, low 10.30’s 1/4 1.41 best 60 foot 6.56 at 104.17
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: B3422W5]
#1642419
07/07/14 12:45 PM
07/07/14 12:45 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 5,183
Porter67
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 5,183
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think most of you are missing the point, what is the cost of I beams? what is the cost of H beams? is it really worth it?
Plenty of high dollar rods are I beam, such as Oliver, etc, etc.
Very true but thats another level of quality/cost.
Ive not done many I beams in the last 10 years, and used olivers actually.
I dont recall the bobweight or if the crank took metal.
Do the scat assemblies get weight taken or added to the crank, most common H beam builds seem to have some taken from the crank, if the I beams called for weight added then, hmmm.
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: Porter67]
#1642420
07/07/14 12:54 PM
07/07/14 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723 Portage,michigan
B3422W5
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723
Portage,michigan
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think most of you are missing the point, what is the cost of I beams? what is the cost of H beams? is it really worth it?
Plenty of high dollar rods are I beam, such as Oliver, etc, etc.
Very true but thats another level of quality/cost.
Ive not done many I beams in the last 10 years, and used olivers actually.
I dont recall the bobweight or if the crank took metal.
Do the scat assemblies get weight taken or added to the crank, most common H beam builds seem to have some taken from the crank, if the I beams called for weight added then, hmmm.
My point was that Quicktree seemed to try and make the point that an I beam type rod was an inherantly bad design. That has zero truth to it
69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight 418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam Best so far, low 10.30’s 1/4 1.41 best 60 foot 6.56 at 104.17
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: B3422W5]
#1642421
07/07/14 01:10 PM
07/07/14 01:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quicktree
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think most of you are missing the point, what is the cost of I beams? what is the cost of H beams? is it really worth it?
Plenty of high dollar rods are I beam, such as Oliver, etc, etc.
absolutely and at that level they are the best, but this cheap chinese junk i wouldn't put in a lawn mower. now the comp series stuff is pretty good, the H beam chinese rods are decent. the I beams are crap. the ones i have seen look like pot metal of old.
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: B3422W5]
#1642422
07/07/14 01:11 PM
07/07/14 01:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quicktree
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think most of you are missing the point, what is the cost of I beams? what is the cost of H beams? is it really worth it?
Plenty of high dollar rods are I beam, such as Oliver, etc, etc.
Very true but thats another level of quality/cost.
Ive not done many I beams in the last 10 years, and used olivers actually.
I dont recall the bobweight or if the crank took metal.
Do the scat assemblies get weight taken or added to the crank, most common H beam builds seem to have some taken from the crank, if the I beams called for weight added then, hmmm.
My point was that Quicktree seemed to try and make the point that an I beam type rod was an inherantly bad design. That has zero truth to it
i never said that at all........
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: Quicktree]
#1642423
07/07/14 01:26 PM
07/07/14 01:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419 Kalispell Mt.
HotRodDave
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,419
Kalispell Mt.
|
Quicktree you need to get your hand on a SCAT I beam before you condemn them, if the Chinese I beams you looked at look like pot metal you have not seen the SCAT you have seen the eagle. They are waaaaaaay better than the eagle all the way around from the bolt quality the material selection the machining quality, you don't have to pay extra to get a bronze bushed small end...
A SCAT I beam is a lot lighter than an H beam and will need material removed from most cranks, more so than the H beam.
To answer the OP question, run the SCAT if you can but don't forget to add in the cost of balancing, a step that could be(but really should not if possible) skipped on a tight budget with stock rods.
I am not causing global warming, I am just trying to hold off a impending Ice Age!
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: Quicktree]
#1642424
07/07/14 01:34 PM
07/07/14 01:34 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723 Portage,michigan
B3422W5
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723
Portage,michigan
|
Quote:
I think most of you are missing the point, what is the cost of I beams? what is the cost of H beams? is it really worth it?
You implied in that statement that if you can get an H beam for the price of an I beam, why wouldn't you do so. IMO, same weight rod to same weight rod, of same material, the I beam has some strength benefits. Btw, are you aware the Scat I beams are 4340 forgings, The Eagle SIR rods are 5140
69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight 418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam Best so far, low 10.30’s 1/4 1.41 best 60 foot 6.56 at 104.17
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: B3422W5]
#1642425
07/07/14 01:41 PM
07/07/14 01:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quicktree
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think most of you are missing the point, what is the cost of I beams? what is the cost of H beams? is it really worth it?
You implied in that statement that if you can get an H beam for the price of an I beam, why wouldn't you do so. IMO, same weight rod to same weight rod, of same material, the I beam has some strength benefits. Btw, are you aware the Scat I beams are 4340 forgings, The Eagle SIR rods are 5140
we were talking chinese crap, not oliver quality
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: HotRodDave]
#1642426
07/07/14 01:43 PM
07/07/14 01:43 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
Quicktree
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 32,394
|
Quote:
Quicktree you need to get your hand on a SCAT I beam before you condemn them, if the Chinese I beams you looked at look like pot metal you have not seen the SCAT you have seen the eagle. They are waaaaaaay better than the eagle all the way around from the bolt quality the material selection the machining quality, you don't have to pay extra to get a bronze bushed small end...
A SCAT I beam is a lot lighter than an H beam and will need material removed from most cranks, more so than the H beam.
To answer the OP question, run the SCAT if you can but don't forget to add in the cost of balancing, a step that could be(but really should not if possible) skipped on a tight budget with stock rods.
run them if you like them, i have seen both and for the price difference i wouldn't use them
|
|
|
Re: Scat or Eagle for I beam rods
[Re: Quicktree]
#1642427
07/07/14 01:46 PM
07/07/14 01:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723 Portage,michigan
B3422W5
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,723
Portage,michigan
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I think most of you are missing the point, what is the cost of I beams? what is the cost of H beams? is it really worth it?
You implied in that statement that if you can get an H beam for the price of an I beam, why wouldn't you do so. IMO, same weight rod to same weight rod, of same material, the I beam has some strength benefits. Btw, are you aware the Scat I beams are 4340 forgings, The Eagle SIR rods are 5140
we were talking chinese crap, not oliver quality
Doesn't matter what price point ..... 4340 is inherantly stronger than 5140, and there is no design liability in using an I beam over an H beam.
69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight 418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam Best so far, low 10.30’s 1/4 1.41 best 60 foot 6.56 at 104.17
|
|
|
|
|