Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Cam Experts #1635804
06/19/14 11:05 PM
06/19/14 11:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 358
western PA
S
Sb Valiant Offline OP
enthusiast
Sb Valiant  Offline OP
enthusiast
S

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 358
western PA
Hello moparts maybe you can help me understand more about .050 cam duration specs. I've talked to several cam manufacturers and people who know cams
supposely. How is it that guys are able to run 252° duration and run deep into 10's? How do you make enough low and top end power in a smaller ci with that conservitive amount of duration. I've heard people suggest 252-258° and 've heard 272-276 @ .050. Also some say between 520-550 lift and some say 620-660 lift. It just doesn't make any sence to me. Either of the cam specs seem to run good under most engine combos. Either 1 guy is shifting at 6000 or the other is 7500. But then I hear people shifting these low duration cams high? My combo is a 344 ci with W2 heads ported, 2.08" intake valves. M1 intake manifold with a lot of work, between 12:1/13:1 cr, 1 7/8 headers, 850 e85 holley carb, and I am wondering what the right cam choice is for this setup. Attended goal is mid 10's.. I'd just like to know something that multiple would agree on so it's not like well 5 guys have this and that opinion and the other 5 have the same opinion. Thanks Moparts

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Sb Valiant] #1635805
06/19/14 11:16 PM
06/19/14 11:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 403
Romulus, MI
GTS340 Offline
mopar
GTS340  Offline
mopar

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 403
Romulus, MI
Small displacement engines are easy to over cam because they make camshafts behave like they are bigger (duration) than they are. On your 344 I personally wouldn't go over 264@050 (and that is if you are indeed 13:1 static CR) but I'm sure others will recommend otherwise. As far as lift, having your heads tested on a flow bench will be a valuable tool, it will also help spec how fast of a rate of lift. Best bet would be to call someone like Bullet cams with all your accurate specs and they will help you out.

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Sb Valiant] #1635806
06/19/14 11:18 PM
06/19/14 11:18 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
I dont think you will get the bulk of the guys on here
to agree on anything... but with a large duration cam
you loose some of the bottom end due to when the intake
closes... also we need to know a bit more.. is it a
foot brake car or trans brake... most guys with a TB
dont ever see any low rpm and then a larger duration
can be a little better.. but if you start low in the
rpm then the smaller duration is helpful... but other
things will come into play also.. the LSA and the
installed degrees and the lift is more based on the
head flow

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Sb Valiant] #1635807
06/19/14 11:25 PM
06/19/14 11:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
Northern Indiana
Dunnuck Racing Offline
master
Dunnuck Racing  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
Northern Indiana
I make no claims to being an expert, but some builders like to aim for torque, others aim for high rpm power, and some try to hit somewhere in the middle. A short duration camshaft in a small cubic inch engine with a fairly large valve and port cross section will still like to turn some rpm.
Most cam companies give generic recommendations. You either have to know somebody there or get mediocre results.
Re read my cam test article and read between the lines.
A certain big name cam company had a horrible suggestion and I had similar recommendations from some people's beloved experts.
The way I look at what is needed has to do with how big a cylinder the valve has to feed and what rpm range is going to be needed.
You need to know the head flow numbers all the way up and past the lift range you are considering to make the best choice. Hope I haven't confused you even more.
Keith

Re: Cam Experts [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1635808
06/19/14 11:25 PM
06/19/14 11:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 358
western PA
S
Sb Valiant Offline OP
enthusiast
Sb Valiant  Offline OP
enthusiast
S

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 358
western PA
Trans brake all the way Mr P. I'll be making a move to the right converter here soon. 8" between 5000-5500 stall. I would like to get the heads and intake manifold on a flow bench before anything goes together and picked out.

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Sb Valiant] #1635809
06/19/14 11:36 PM
06/19/14 11:36 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Trans brake all the way Mr P. I'll be making a move to the right converter here soon. 8" between 5000-5500 stall. I would like to get the heads and intake manifold on a flow bench before anything goes together and picked out.




When using a high flow head.. I should say large cross
section area you have to turn more rpms to make the
heads efficient and when you turn up the rpm you have
to gain lift or duration to fill the cyl in the short
time you have in the upper rpm.. so yes you should
know all the data on the heads first thing

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Sb Valiant] #1635810
06/19/14 11:41 PM
06/19/14 11:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
T
Thumperdart Offline
I Live Here
Thumperdart  Offline
I Live Here
T

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
No expert but I had Isky grind me a solid roller for my junk that most said wouldn`t work but seems to be doin just fine and from recommendations on here I even called Bullet to see if they could make a better cam that won`t eat springs and be streetable and they said no. I usually like more duration than most which may help w/traction in some cases but pulls like a freight train up top. Don`t know what my heads flow and don`t care but as stated above there`s a bit of math and science involved but I sucked in both of those classes so I just WING IT.............


72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
Re: Cam Experts [Re: Thumperdart] #1635811
06/20/14 12:03 AM
06/20/14 12:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,711
Portage,michigan
B
B3422W5 Offline
I Live Here
B3422W5  Offline
I Live Here
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,711
Portage,michigan
If your looking for cam help for a combination I can give three words of advice....call Dwayne Porter........


69 Dart GTS A4 Silver All steel, flat factory hood, 3360race weight
418 BPE factory replacement headed stroker, 565 lift solid cam
Best so far, 10.40 @127 1/4
1.41 best 60 foot
6.60 at 103.90 1/8

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Thumperdart] #1635812
06/20/14 12:17 AM
06/20/14 12:17 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267
North, Alabama
D-50 Offline
pro stock
D-50  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,267
North, Alabama
My small block is 394ci. which is larger than yours, that would probably make a difference. But roller cam is 255/266 @ .050, 10.9 to 1 comp. Mine has pretty good bottom end 1.33 60ft. and I have ran 109 mph in the 1/8. I Believe if I had more duration at .050 I would not have a lot of cranking cylinder pressure. But I can run pump gas. It is 190-200 now.


1.33 60 ft,6.21 at 110.59 in the 1/8, pump gas small block,2950lbs,drag radials,mufflers and driven to track ...
Re: Cam Experts [Re: D-50] #1635813
06/20/14 12:37 AM
06/20/14 12:37 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Smaller stroke engines need less duration... as the
stroke goes up so should the duration... but the thing
is... what is the amount... yeah it can be figure in
math but a good cam person that knows all the specs
of the engine will have a better handle on it plus
he most likely has other engines out there with known
power and results

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Dunnuck Racing] #1635814
06/20/14 12:50 AM
06/20/14 12:50 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
Northern Indiana
Dunnuck Racing Offline
master
Dunnuck Racing  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
Northern Indiana
I'll also mention this, when bad advice gets repeated enough on a forum, many people treat it as gospel.
You sometimes have to learn by trial and error, either who to take advice from, or by trying things for yourself
Keith

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Dunnuck Racing] #1635815
06/20/14 02:07 AM
06/20/14 02:07 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

I'll also mention this, when bad advice gets repeated enough on a forum, many people treat it as gospel.
You sometimes have to learn by trial and error, either who to take advice from, or by trying things for yourself
Keith




Yeah I went with the advise of a so called cam guy
and its way off ... mine could use at least .100-
.150 more lift and the duration is to much... he knew
the engine specs and head flows and came up with what
I have... I thought about having it reground but I
ended up selling the engine and I gave the buyer a
new cam core to have another cam ground or he can
have the one in it ground and keep the core as a spare

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Sb Valiant] #1635816
06/20/14 02:12 AM
06/20/14 02:12 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,485
SoCal
Brian Hafliger Offline
master
Brian Hafliger  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,485
SoCal
Quote:

Hello moparts maybe you can help me understand more about .050 cam duration specs. I've talked to several cam manufacturers and people who know cams
supposely. How is it that guys are able to run 252° duration and run deep into 10's? How do you make enough low and top end power in a smaller ci with that conservitive amount of duration. I've heard people suggest 252-258° and 've heard 272-276 @ .050. Also some say between 520-550 lift and some say 620-660 lift. It just doesn't make any sence to me. Either of the cam specs seem to run good under most engine combos. Either 1 guy is shifting at 6000 or the other is 7500. But then I hear people shifting these low duration cams high? My combo is a 344 ci with W2 heads ported, 2.08" intake valves. M1 intake manifold with a lot of work, between 12:1/13:1 cr, 1 7/8 headers, 850 e85 holley carb, and I am wondering what the right cam choice is for this setup. Attended goal is mid 10's.. I'd just like to know something that multiple would agree on so it's not like well 5 guys have this and that opinion and the other 5 have the same opinion. Thanks Moparts




The biggest difference you need to look at is what TYPE of cam...Solid roller, solid FT, hyd. FT, or Hyd. roller. Duration @ .050 is just a point on the lobe the lifter hits...and the shape of the "curve" will look very different between all these cam types.

My 360 in my duster ran 10.50's and 10.60's with a solid FT cam that was 264@ .050 and made peak HP at 7300 on my dyno. It also had W2 heads. Before that, I had a solid FT cam that was 250-258@ .050 and peaked at 7100rpm.

You have to take everything about the car/engine and intended usage into consideration when spec'ing a cam IMO. It also doesn't hurt to have experience.

Brian


Brian Hafliger
Re: Cam Experts [Re: B3422W5] #1635817
06/20/14 02:35 AM
06/20/14 02:35 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Quote:

If your looking for cam help for a combination I can give three words of advice....call Dwayne Porter........




This is very good advise. Dwayne speced my solid flat tappet for my 63 street car and I am very happy with it. I have been a tech for about 40 years (will be 58 in July) and I became a tech because I wanted to build my own engines and cars so I made myself learn as much as I could because I wanted to know how every part of a car worked and I learnt alot about cams and feel I know cams pretty good. But when it comes to specing the right cam for a certain build its best to go with someone who is really a pro at that and does it everyday and then dyno's the engines so they know what works best because they are a pro at that and do it every day. Thats what Dwayne Porter is a pro at eng builds including specing cams. Many of us gearheads on hear know cams pretty good but as Mr P said you will still get 20 different answers as most of us know how cams work but dont match them to eng builds everyday. Myself I will tell you to call Dwayne Porter and talk to him as every eng I see he does work on always runs good. Thats one of the reasons I went to him. If you decide too we have his phone # so just ask if you want it. I will say on a side note that one thing I found is I would rather under cam then over cam an eng. Ron

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Brian Hafliger] #1635818
06/20/14 03:32 AM
06/20/14 03:32 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 358
western PA
S
Sb Valiant Offline OP
enthusiast
Sb Valiant  Offline OP
enthusiast
S

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 358
western PA
Well here is where I am at. I bought a slightly used solid roller cam off a guy I know on Facebook. He was running it in a 416 ci 14:1 cr with W2 heads and claimed he needed more cam for his combination. With the little knowledge I have I thought the cam specs were pretty reasonable for my build. It's a custom grind Reed cams 625/625 @ 1.5 with 260/265 @ .050, 294/300, on a 106 centerline. I got the cam plus
shipping for $155. Thinking I was saving money and getting a good deal the solid roller setup is still expensive.. I still need roller lifters, valve springs, and "should" buy all new valves and retainers, plus bronze distributor gear, ect. I have a set of bushed iron rockers that have had a good amount of runs over the years on them how many I don't know . I've heard I can run a roller cam on them but it would be much better if I could find a set of roller rockers and I posted a wanted ad. With out looking @ the cam card I know the cam calls for over 600 lbs open spring pressure and I need a decent rocker to use the cam w/o any issues. If worst came to worse I could always throw a solid FT in and it would be much more forgiving on parts. Either way I am trying to work with anything I can here.. I'm trying to for fill my goal of
tbeing in the 10's. How far in the 10's? I really don't know it could be a 10.99 or 10.29
I could live with either one. It would be nice to go deep as possible into the 10's
with what I have to work with. For a rpm I don't want to get too carried away but I can live with 7,500 rpms. I don't want to go much more or any over that. The car is lite and it should work good with the new ladder bar and coil over setup. Thanks

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Sb Valiant] #1635819
06/20/14 05:42 AM
06/20/14 05:42 AM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar Offline
master
451Mopar  Offline
master

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
Call the experts and see what they recommend. You will need an idea of what the heads flow, and the intake port cross section area (no reason to over cam what the heads won't flow.)
If the car is setup with alot of gear and converter, you can use a larger cam that has more power in a narrow power band. If the car is more street/strip setup, then you need a wider power band / smaller cam. The 0.050" numbers are just a general reference point when comparing cam size, but it tells nothing of the rate of lift (two cams with the same 0.050" numbers can be quite different at 0.200+" lobe lift.) Your rocker arm ratio needs to be taken into account too. For our older Mopar engines, usually 1.6:1 ratio is normal, higher ratios are fairly uncommon because of cost.

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Sb Valiant] #1635820
06/20/14 10:40 AM
06/20/14 10:40 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Well here is where I am at. I bought a slightly used solid roller cam off a guy I know on Facebook. He was running it in a 416 ci 14:1 cr with W2 heads and claimed he needed more cam for his combination. With the little knowledge I have I thought the cam specs were pretty reasonable for my build. It's a custom grind Reed cams 625/625 @ 1.5 with 260/265 @ .050, 294/300, on a 106 centerline. I got the cam plus
shipping for $155. Thinking I was saving money and getting a good deal the solid roller setup is still expensive.. I still need roller lifters, valve springs, and "should" buy all new valves and retainers, plus bronze distributor gear, ect. I have a set of bushed iron rockers that have had a good amount of runs over the years on them how many I don't know . I've heard I can run a roller cam on them but it would be much better if I could find a set of roller rockers and I posted a wanted ad. With out looking @ the cam card I know the cam calls for over 600 lbs open spring pressure and I need a decent rocker to use the cam w/o any issues. If worst came to worse I could always throw a solid FT in and it would be much more forgiving on parts. Either way I am trying to work with anything I can here.. I'm trying to for fill my goal of
tbeing in the 10's. How far in the 10's? I really don't know it could be a 10.99 or 10.29
I could live with either one. It would be nice to go deep as possible into the 10's
with what I have to work with. For a rpm I don't want to get too carried away but I can live with 7,500 rpms. I don't want to go much more or any over that. The car is lite and it should work good with the new ladder bar and coil over setup. Thanks




I have a cam similar to your roller in my 416 in
my Rampage.. it seems to work pretty decent.. granted
mine is similar but yet its different.. mine has .015
more lift and is on a 105 LSA.. I normally install
a cam advanced to help the lower rpm torque but on this
one I put it in a 105 because I didnt want the added
torque to stall the conv higher being its a 5000 stall
already and its a street/strip car

Re: Cam Experts [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1635821
06/20/14 10:53 AM
06/20/14 10:53 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
Northern Indiana
Dunnuck Racing Offline
master
Dunnuck Racing  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,300
Northern Indiana
Since we are talking camshafts and rocker arms I'll throw this in.
Look at how many guys tell you a 1.6 rocker ratio is good on the intake side but not on the exhaust side. Then they will recommend a camshaft with a huge duration and/ or lift split favoring the exhaust side. Every "expert" has their own way of doing things and not necessarily the best way.
Keith

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Dunnuck Racing] #1635822
06/20/14 11:08 AM
06/20/14 11:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Quote:

Since we are talking camshafts and rocker arms I'll throw this in.
Look at how many guys tell you a 1.6 rocker ratio is good on the intake side but not on the exhaust side. Then they will recommend a camshaft with a huge duration and/ or lift split favoring the exhaust side. Every "expert" has their own way of doing things and not necessarily the best way.
Keith




I am no expert on cams thats for sure... I have plenty
of trial and error time in on my own junk

Re: Cam Experts [Re: Dunnuck Racing] #1635823
06/20/14 12:30 PM
06/20/14 12:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines Offline
master
CompWedgeEngines  Offline
master

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
Quote:

I'll also mention this, when bad advice gets repeated enough on a forum, many people treat it as gospel.
You sometimes have to learn by trial and error, either who to take advice from, or by trying things for yourself
Keith




Hallelujah on that one Keith!...


RIP Monte Smith

Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.

WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1