Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Mopar Electronic Ignition Distributor [Re: WyleECoyote] #1617572
05/14/14 01:43 PM
05/14/14 01:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
Here goes again.....As many have said before me, and I rely on their veracity, unless your distributor is completely worn out the Pertronix conversion is a slam dunk. But don't expect it to make a difference in how the car runs. You may "feel" a difference, but I remind you that in at least 30% of the population, the placebo effect works.

Now, what will make a difference is getting your advance curve right.

Here I go a little off topic. I divide the automotive world into "weekend drivers" and "weekend racers". Blazin' Bob is a weekend racer. As such, he knows how to recurve a distributor, and the benefits from that. A weekend driver won't generally know how or why to recurve a distributor.

That is why I cringe every time a weekend racer tells a weekend driver to buy a stock rebuilt distributor and put a Pertronix kit in it. The weekend driver, not knowing how or why, will probably not recurve the stock distributor with its lazy curve. On the other hand, if the weekend driver buys a distributor with a high performance curve and stabs it in, the results will be much better. At this point the weekend driver says, "Wow, changing from points to breakerless ignition really woke the car up!" Weekend racers will understand that it was the better curve that woke the car up.

Properly-set-up points type ignitions, especially those triggering an electronic box, will support a very high performance engine. What one gains from the breakerless conversion is repeatability, rpm, and freedom from wear effects.

R.

Re: Mopar Electronic Ignition Distributor [Re: BDW] #1617573
05/14/14 06:57 PM
05/14/14 06:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,360
Aurora, Oh.
M
max_maniac Offline
master
max_maniac  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,360
Aurora, Oh.
Quote:

Cut-n-paste about problems with newer MP distributor
The whole story is in the Feb '14 Mopar Action.

I just read the Mopar Action article. I've used the newer MP distributor in the past and it worked in my application but both the mechanical advance and vacuum advance were disabled. The distributor was locked out. Based on that I can't comment on the spark scatter issue from a personal perspective but i have seen some erratic timing on other car's i've helped to tune. It can be frustrating swapping out springs and resetting/adjusting mechanical advance with marginal results. :P

The MA article does make mention of the FireCore billet distributors and upon testing they found that timing was rock solid with the Firecore unit. Ehrenberg even summerizes the article by saying ; your best option is to find an old 73 distributor and rebuild/modify it or purchase the FireCore unit. More or less of what i've been telling members for the past few years ; Firecore is a top shelf product and i wouldn't be recommending it to my friends if it wasn't.

As for the ECU's ; there is a member on Moparts who has been doing a fair bit of dyno testing on the replacement style ECU's and the only ones he likes are the rev-n-ator and FBO box. All the other chinese knockoffs pull timing and higher rpm and loose power at peak volumetric efficiency which is when the greatest demand on the ignition system occurs.

Mopar performance is out of the electronic conversion market at this point which isn't necessarily a bad thing based on recent reports.





I must comment on this subject. First of all here are my disclamers: I do not write articles for any Mopar rag and I do not have a dyno machine. In fact my engines have never been on a dyno as I use the track as my test.

I switched from the Mopar dizzy to a Firecore when they first came out and was impressed with the piece and the steady timing. Did it improve mt ET on the track? Not at all. So after running it for a while in a high 9 sec car I started having issues when I towed to a race in St. Louis and I live in Ohio. Was going some rounds and then the engine started breaking up and getting worse with each run and I could not find the problem at the track so packed it in and towed it home to diagnose the issue. After looking at valve springs and many other things I noticed the distributor screws on the side of the base were loose??? I tried to tighten them to no avail so I take the thing apart and find that the plastic mounts for the weights are worn and cracked and the weights are flying around in the distributor Not good on an expensive race engine so I get in touch with Rick and he swaps it out for a new one he said there were a couple issues but that was resolved. So in goes the new and improved one and only into my 3rd race and the same thing starts happening again. First thing I checked is the distributor!! Bingo - same issue. So in my application of using the Firecore for race only it is no longer an option for me. I cannot risk the expense of the engine to a distributor so I went back to the Mopar one and problem solved. In fact I will be upgrading to a crank trigger now anyway. I also know personally of 3 others that have had the exact same issue and if they want to add to this then they can as I will not mention their names.

In the end the Firecore may be good for some but for me it is a no go and will never have another on any of my cars.

Russ

Re: Mopar Electronic Ignition Distributor [Re: dogdays] #1617574
05/14/14 07:04 PM
05/14/14 07:04 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
M
mikemee1331 Offline
master
mikemee1331  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,154
bethlehem pa
Quote:

Here goes again.....As many have said before me, and I rely on their veracity, unless your distributor is completely worn out the Pertronix conversion is a slam dunk. But don't expect it to make a difference in how the car runs. You may "feel" a difference, but I remind you that in at least 30% of the population, the placebo effect works.

Now, what will make a difference is getting your advance curve right.

Here I go a little off topic. I divide the automotive world into "weekend drivers" and "weekend racers". Blazin' Bob is a weekend racer. As such, he knows how to recurve a distributor, and the benefits from that. A weekend driver won't generally know how or why to recurve a distributor.

That is why I cringe every time a weekend racer tells a weekend driver to buy a stock rebuilt distributor and put a Pertronix kit in it. The weekend driver, not knowing how or why, will probably not recurve the stock distributor with its lazy curve. On the other hand, if the weekend driver buys a distributor with a high performance curve and stabs it in, the results will be much better. At this point the weekend driver says, "Wow, changing from points to breakerless ignition really woke the car up!" Weekend racers will understand that it was the better curve that woke the car up.

Properly-set-up points type ignitions, especially those triggering an electronic box, will support a very high performance engine. What one gains from the breakerless conversion is repeatability, rpm, and freedom from wear effects.

R.


nicely put and where have you been all my life!

Re: Mopar Electronic Ignition Distributor [Re: mikemee1331] #1617575
05/15/14 12:37 AM
05/15/14 12:37 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,379
Tennessee
WyleECoyote Offline OP
pro stock
WyleECoyote  Offline OP
pro stock

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,379
Tennessee


Okay. I have to breath here. I AM a weekend driver. Or thought I was… Or wanted to be. Or maybe I am just being too lazy. No, I AM being too lazy. I guess it's time for me to step up to the plate and learn all this distributor, curving, and timing stuff.

My daily driver cars make it too EASY to be lazy because they run fantastic!

My 72 Imperial (130,000-mile all original), my 71 Super Bee (71,000-mile all original with a Mallory Uni-lite {Installed before me}) and my 84 Crew Cab Dually (440 engine from a 72 Imperial that had 85,000 miles on it) - are all jump-in-and-drive vehicles with no thoughts or maintenance.

Now, the 440 that Hensley built for my Road Runner isn't a stock engine though like I just mentioned. 9.9:1 compression; 564/570 cam (274/280 - 236/242 @ .50), port matched heads with 1.88 and 2.14 valves. I don't know really what all that means so therefore I'm sure that its time for school and as I said, learn more about timing and the distributor.

Maybe after the journey I'm about to embark upon, I'll write a "Mopar Timing For Dummies" Book and take all-ya'll out on my yacht to celebrate!

I didn't mean to turn this thread into what it has - I thought I'd get one person to reply and say "Summit" and that would be the end of the thread! No such luck!!

Maybe I outta move this over to the Unlawful thread 'fore I get kicked out of here!!!

Thanks everyone!

Re: Mopar Electronic Ignition Distributor [Re: WyleECoyote] #1617576
05/15/14 01:20 AM
05/15/14 01:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,782
USA
J
JoesMopar Offline
master
JoesMopar  Offline
master
J

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,782
USA
I've used the MP ignition kit you posted earlier in several applications and never had any problems, they work just fine. I've also never had an orange box failure, with all the orange box talk I should have had 200 of them fail on me by now. I'm open to trying something "new" like the Mallory unit, but if it isn't broke, I'm not going to "fix" it.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1