Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
B vs RB strength #1510357
09/30/13 09:05 PM
09/30/13 09:05 PM
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 57
cedar rapids, iowa
S
superhog88 Offline OP
member
superhog88  Offline OP
member
S

Joined: May 2008
Posts: 57
cedar rapids, iowa
which block would be stronger for a 500in stroker turbo build and would aluminum main caps and main stud girdle be stronger than four bolt caps and main stud girdle

Re: B vs RB strength [Re: superhog88] #1510358
09/30/13 09:18 PM
09/30/13 09:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,215
Bend,OR USA
Quote:

which block would be stronger for a 500in stroker turbo build and would aluminum main caps and main stud girdle be stronger than four bolt caps and main stud girdle


The 400 block, that sonic tests well, is a lot better choice for a stroker build What amount of power and how much life do you want out of this build? If your going to use a power adder of any sort to start with and want to make over 800 HP, start with a good race block now instead of trying to bandaid and patch up a stock block As far as adding bottom end strength to a Mopar wedge block like the 361/440 blocks a good set of steel or aluminum main caps and main studs will help a bunch, the stock caps with bolts will crack and fail, if you abuse and push it far enough I don't like the four bolt main cap coversions at all They require drilling through the stock main webbing removing one of the designed in strengths of those block Same thing on a bolt in girdle, using the oil pan bolts and main studs only adds longitudintional(SP?) stabilty, no strength added that I can see to the main webbing


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: B vs RB strength [Re: Cab_Burge] #1510359
09/30/13 09:38 PM
09/30/13 09:38 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 68
Omaha, NE
D
dart69bigblock Offline
member
dart69bigblock  Offline
member
D

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 68
Omaha, NE
What about the 230 cast 400 blocks? Obviously these have a ton more meat to the webbing. Will this handle a considerable more amount of power than the other blocks?

Re: B vs RB strength [Re: superhog88] #1510360
09/30/13 09:55 PM
09/30/13 09:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,010
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
I Live Here
gregsdart  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,010
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
I have a Megablock, and had some cap walk despite four bolt mains. I bought a center counter weighted crank, and the problem went away. That tells me those center counter weights are worth a lot of stress reduction. Look at some of the high powered motors out there that now run center counter weights stock. Ford saw fit to equip some of its top performers, knowing that guys like us will put blowers on them and turn the wick way up. I don't understand why more engine builders don't promote these. It is pretty simple. If you are balancing the center rods and pistons on counter weights that are not directly under them, you get rid of vibrations, but the stress of those imbalance loads has to travel through the block! So guess what happens next. The main webbing in the block lets go. If the stress were evened out, I bet a stock block would take a lot more punishment. The cranks won't flex as much, and live longer also. If you are set on using a stock block, then the center weighted crank is what I would use.
The stock block will still be a limiting factor though. It doesn't have the thick cylinders or the robust bottom end of a KB for instance. For a very high power application, then to me it only makes sense to use both the center weights, and an aftermarket block. Then crank up the boost!!


8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
Re: B vs RB strength [Re: gregsdart] #1510361
09/30/13 10:39 PM
09/30/13 10:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,542
USA
H
hudsonhornet7x Offline
pro stock
hudsonhornet7x  Offline
pro stock
H

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,542
USA
Quote:

I have a Megablock, and had some cap walk despite four bolt mains. I bought a center counter weighted crank, and the problem went away. That tells me those center counter weights are worth a lot of stress reduction. Look at some of the high powered motors out there that now run center counter weights stock. Ford saw fit to equip some of its top performers, knowing that guys like us will put blowers on them and turn the wick way up. I don't understand why more engine builders don't promote these. It is pretty simple. If you are balancing the center rods and pistons on counter weights that are not directly under them, you get rid of vibrations, but the stress of those imbalance loads has to travel through the block! So guess what happens next. The main webbing in the block lets go. If the stress were evened out, I bet a stock block would take a lot more punishment. The cranks won't flex as much, and live longer also. If you are set on using a stock block, then the center weighted crank is what I would use.
The stock block will still be a limiting factor though. It doesn't have the thick cylinders or the robust bottom end of a KB for instance. For a very high power application, then to me it only makes sense to use both the center weights, and an aftermarket block. Then crank up the boost!!





2 Questions: Where do you get one of these cranks?
Would this make an engine run smoother?

Thanks!

Re: B vs RB strength [Re: hudsonhornet7x] #1510362
10/01/13 07:29 AM
10/01/13 07:29 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,010
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart Offline
I Live Here
gregsdart  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,010
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
I bought mine directly from Crower for $2200, and it ain't cheap, but it is a better deal than 100 passes on an $800 crank that cracked. There are other crank companys out there selling them, check with Dan at Performance only (DRAM) he may be able to fix you up.


8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1