Please rate time slip for street car
#1509279
09/28/13 09:42 PM
09/28/13 09:42 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,356 Kentucky
dfsmopars
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,356
Kentucky
|
Not that I really feel I have to say this but please be honest but rate this time slip. Car '72 Charger, full interior, 360 Magnum (.02 over), full roller, .544 lift 218/228 Hughes cam, 650 Carter on Air Gap intake, RHS iron heads, Hooker SB headers, timing at 35° advanced, MSD Pro Billet distributor (no box), 2.5" exhaust, AT w/2500 Hughes stall, 3.55 gears, 28.5 x 12 tires.
Time Slip 60'- 2.02 E.T.- 14.20 MPH- 93.5
Last edited by dfsmopars; 09/28/13 09:43 PM.
‘72 Charger, 5.9 Magnum, Tremec 5 spd., Pro-Touring ‘14 Big Horn, Quad Cab, 4x4, 1500
|
|
|
Re: Please rate time slip for street car
[Re: dfsmopars]
#1509281
09/28/13 09:53 PM
09/28/13 09:53 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,119 85086
moparpollack
Lil Herman
|
Lil Herman
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,119
85086
|
Needs suspension work!!!
56 Plaza 63 D100 step side 67 Coronet, 68 Roadrunner, 69 Super Bees, 69 Coronet 500 convertible, 70 Roadrunner Post, 79 D150 360, and a severe case of Mopar a,d,d
|
|
|
Re: Please rate time slip for street car
[Re: moparpollack]
#1509282
09/28/13 10:03 PM
09/28/13 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,835 Kirkland, Washington
Pacnorthcuda
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 21,835
Kirkland, Washington
|
Quote:
Needs suspension work!!!
Maybe, but that's not the big issue. The big problem is the 93.5 trap. A 2.02 60 can produce ETs in the low to mid 13's pretty easy, IF the top end is there. OP: you're not creating the HP you should. It could be the tune, or that carter carb, but something is holding back on the top end.
|
|
|
Re: Please rate time slip for street car
[Re: Pacnorthcuda]
#1509283
09/28/13 10:06 PM
09/28/13 10:06 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,119 85086
moparpollack
Lil Herman
|
Lil Herman
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 15,119
85086
|
Quote:
Quote:
Needs suspension work!!!
Maybe, but that's not the big issue. The big problem is the 93.5 trap. A 2.02 60 can produce ETs in the low to mid 13's pretty easy, IF the top end is there. OP: you're not creating the HP you should. It could be the tune, or that carter carb, but something is holding back on the top end.
Just reread the post needs fuel work and a better carb!
56 Plaza 63 D100 step side 67 Coronet, 68 Roadrunner, 69 Super Bees, 69 Coronet 500 convertible, 70 Roadrunner Post, 79 D150 360, and a severe case of Mopar a,d,d
|
|
|
Re: Please rate time slip for street car
[Re: dfsmopars]
#1509286
09/28/13 10:37 PM
09/28/13 10:37 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,318 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,318
Prospect, PA
|
Quote:
Not that I really feel I have to say this but please be honest but rate this time slip. Car '72 Charger, full interior, 360 Magnum (.02 over), full roller, .544 lift 218/228 Hughes cam, 650 Carter on Air Gap intake, RHS iron heads, Hooker SB headers, timing at 35° advanced, MSD Pro Billet distributor (no box), 2.5" exhaust, AT w/2500 Hughes stall, 3.55 gears, 28.5 x 12 tires.
Time Slip 60'- 2.02 E.T.- 14.20 MPH- 93.5
Hmmmm. If you are a typical hobbyist and just took it to the track the first time, I think that is pretty good. That car/engine combo from the factory was a high 15 second deal. Do you know what the car weighs?
Unless you have done this before, it is hard to put it together, go to the track, and expect it to be near perfect. I would guess that you could get it well into the 13s at 96 mph with tuning, trialing and several more track visits.
Just noticed the tire size. Put a smaller tire on it. That alone will probably put you at 14.0 and 95 mph.
Last edited by BSB67; 09/28/13 10:44 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Please rate time slip for street car
[Re: dfsmopars]
#1509289
09/28/13 10:58 PM
09/28/13 10:58 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,356 Kentucky
dfsmopars
OP
top fuel
|
OP
top fuel
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,356
Kentucky
|
OK, where to begin. Everyone's replies are very thought provoking. Car weight- 3600#? Tires are Toyo Proxes mounted on 18x10s The TC was picked because I needed a LU for an A500. This is first and foremost a cruiser and long hauler but needs to perform to its potential Switched out Carter for Eddy 1411 and it was way worse- put the Carter back on Thought the car ran good, driver could have left the line harder but it wasn't horrible, expected low 14s but hoped for high 13s A few 1/4 mile passes before with best previous experience was a '01 Firehawk 6 speed that went 13.05 @ 106 mph. Seeing a common thread in the replies
‘72 Charger, 5.9 Magnum, Tremec 5 spd., Pro-Touring ‘14 Big Horn, Quad Cab, 4x4, 1500
|
|
|
Re: Please rate time slip for street car
[Re: BSB67]
#1509290
09/28/13 11:05 PM
09/28/13 11:05 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271 Overpriced Housing Central
RobX4406
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 12,271
Overpriced Housing Central
|
Quote:
I disagree. He probably has an honest 290 flywheel hp. I would not really expect more than 320, maybe 330 out of it.
That's 360 w/stock heads and xe256-268 hyd territory.
That engine should be making an honest high 3's easily. RHS headed 360's with 9.5:1 and xe275hl will make 420's+.
The tune up, fuel delivery, something is way off, IMO. 3600# only makes it look worse.
|
|
|
Re: Please rate time slip for street car
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#1509292
09/29/13 12:42 AM
09/29/13 12:42 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
For what it's worth...
My combo
5.9L magnum. Stock heads 2bbl M1 intake 222/228 107LSA, .544 lift 4000lb truck Stick shift 3.92 gears, 27" tires, stick shift
2.2-2.3 60' 14.2 @ 99 mph
Your combo has a slightly smaller cam, but better flowing heads. You have a lot more potential with more tuning.
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
|
|