Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Actual compression ratio *DELETED* #1480006
08/05/13 11:50 AM
08/05/13 11:50 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
R
rbstroker Offline OP
super stock
rbstroker  Offline OP
super stock
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
Post deleted by rbstroker


This is the land of the free because of the brave
Re: Actual compression ratio [Re: rbstroker] #1480007
08/05/13 12:08 PM
08/05/13 12:08 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Well that is a hard question but they are never to their blue print spec.
Decks can be higher than spec and heads are almost a given to be several cc over spec.
so .5 to 1 number are the norm seemed farther off in the 74 to end years. so if you picked .750 as a average for below advertised compression would get you in a ball park of true numbers.

So if you were to say OK a 10.5 to one would be 9.75 to one as factory assemble you would be close.
10 to 1 maybe 9.25 to 1
8.5 to 1 7.75 to 1 .
Every motor will vary on how much it is off spec so there is no magic formula

Last edited by Dodgem; 08/05/13 12:12 PM.
Re: Actual compression ratio [Re: rbstroker] #1480008
08/05/13 02:34 PM
08/05/13 02:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,095
A Banana Republic near you.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,095
A Banana Republic near you.
Quote:

I know that the advertised compression ratios for many of the late 60's to late 70's big blocks were overstated. Does anyone have the actual compression ratios (as built by ma mopar) for some of the 440's including the six pack engines?




What year engine ? 67-69 is different that 70-71 and then 72 up

Re: Actual compression ratio [Re: JohnRR] #1480009
08/06/13 10:15 AM
08/06/13 10:15 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
R
rbstroker Offline OP
super stock
rbstroker  Offline OP
super stock
R

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,139
West Tennessee
Without actually purchasing one and tearing it down, I'm trying to figure if some of the later 440's actually had compression ratio as low as 8:1 or lower. If so, what would the camshaft specs be and would a modern grind and fast advance curve make one of these engines perfect for a street driven car able to use today's terrible gasoline.


This is the land of the free because of the brave
Re: Actual compression ratio [Re: rbstroker] #1480010
08/06/13 10:27 AM
08/06/13 10:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
R
RapidRobert Offline
Circle Track
RapidRobert  Offline
Circle Track
R

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 36,041
Lincoln Nebraska
Quote:

I'm trying to figure if some of the later 440's actually had compression ratio as low as 8:1 or lower. If so, what would the camshaft specs be and would a modern grind and fast advance curve make one of these engines perfect for a street driven car able to use today's terrible gasoline.


(1) yes (2) not sure (3) Hughes' cams & yes a fast curve. You would want to rering/bearing it & if going that far it might be appropriate to rebore with higher CR pistons


live every 24 hour block of time like it's your last day on earth
Re: Actual compression ratio [Re: RapidRobert] #1480011
08/06/13 10:32 AM
08/06/13 10:32 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada



(1) yes (2) not sure (3) Hughes' cams & yes a fast curve. You would want to rering/bearing it & if going that far it might be appropriate to rebore with higher CR pistons





Sounds about right,







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1