Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 440 Stroker Build Questions [Re: tywebb2] #1434199
05/13/13 08:51 PM
05/13/13 08:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 319
jonestown,pa
D
dmking Offline
enthusiast
dmking  Offline
enthusiast
D

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 319
jonestown,pa
ty the reason i am on my last 440 build is the smallest area at the mains is .380ish and the thicker 440 i have is about .511 the bore supports are now a tad over 3" from less than 2". i have 14lb hard block and a 3/4" gurdle.
the 400 blocks mains at the thin point is over .600" and supports are 3.5"
i dodged a big one not messing anything up.
my parts list is 440 .030 over. 263/265 110Ls 630lift cam old indy heads flow about 335cfm 49cc chambers 270cc runners about 13 to 1 compression. m1 dominator intake with a 1050. 2" old proparts headers 9" with 4:30 gears 30"x10.5" hosiers caltracks with the monoleaf all in a duster @3170lb with me in it. it split the block at cecil,md just after a 132mph pass. oiled the track non the less.

if starting from scratch leave your self some room to grow with out making a bomb. check out that newer block you have and see if it is the thicker one. i am crossing my fingers on mine and it is the last one i worry about.

next one for me is a 470" 400 block stroker with 440-1 heads.

Re: 440 Stroker Build Questions [Re: tywebb2] #1434200
05/13/13 09:29 PM
05/13/13 09:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
Quote:

I hate to say it but the thought also crossed my mind after reading 600hp is the limit, etc. with the 440 block. Could a stroker be overkill for my application and just open up other cans of worm? I'm curious....what hp is my 8 3/4 rear good too? I have no interest in upgrading to a dana.

The major issue I have with my engine now is the TRW pistons. The valve notches are too small for the Eddy valves and I am at the limit of my valve clearance and my compression is a bit low (9.9:1) with pistons down in hole (bad quench height).

Would it make more sense just to swap out the stock rods with H-beams and get a new set of pistons....then possibly CNC porting the heads? Would I still need to zero deck the block or could I buy pistons off the shelf that would put me where I need to be out of the box? Then with my piston-to-valve clearance opened up I could go with a different cam.

I put the numbers in a hp calculator and it came back at 519hp if my weight figure is correct. How much do you think I would pick-up (hp and et) getting the proper quench height, 10.5:1 compression, better cam, cnc ported eddy heads?




A big benefit of the aluminum heads is quench area. This allows higher compression and power on pump gas. To get the best quench you really need to zero deck or close. Its likely possible with stock pistons but will take some deck milling. If it hasn't been squared up already, it needs milled anyhow since factory dimensions varied a lot.

For the rear, its largely a matter weight. With 3700# and 11'ish second 1/4 I think you are living on the edge already. I run an 8 3/4 behind my 496 but that's road driven only. No strip, no slicks.

Re: 440 Stroker Build Questions [Re: ahy] #1434201
05/13/13 09:49 PM
05/13/13 09:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
I still have an 8-3/4 in my 63. So far its held up but I only race about 2 times a year. If I raced alot I would be more worried about it and I would go for a Dana. If you go low 11's at your weight and only race a few times a year you may get away with it like I have so far. On my 440 block I went with main studs and as I said I dont race it alot as it has held up fine for 2 years so far. Ron

Last edited by 383man; 05/13/13 09:52 PM.
Re: 440 Stroker Build Questions [Re: BradH] #1434202
05/13/13 11:05 PM
05/13/13 11:05 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,563
Downtown Roebuck Ont
Twostick Offline
Still wishing...
Twostick  Offline
Still wishing...

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,563
Downtown Roebuck Ont
Quote:

OK, here's the dissenting opinion about to rear it's ugly (and balding) head: If all you want is low 11s (per your above statement), you don't need to build a stroker. A stronger stock-stroke 440 will get you there, plus your current 4.10 gear & 28" tire combination will be well suited to the shorter-stroke combination's RPM range on the track.

IMO, you should...
- port the E heads
- run a fairly aggressive solid flat-tappet cam
- run a good single-plane intake (not sure what you have now)
- build for about 10.5 CR to stay safe on 93-octane pump fuel

A 440 in that HP range would probably be just as happy (maybe happier) w/ 1-7/8" headers. But since I think you said you already have 2", run what you got.

You may need to change converters, but that depends on how your current one works w/ the new engine. The biggest hit on performance will be if the 10" doesn't let you 60-ft. as well as something a little looser.

FWIW, this is both opinion and fact-based from the results I've seen on my own builds.




He also said mostly street driven. 500+ cubes makes it easier to keep all the compromises less compromising if you will.

Kevin

Re: 440 Stroker Build Questions [Re: tywebb2] #1434203
05/14/13 02:49 AM
05/14/13 02:49 AM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,464
Sydney,Australia
tex013 Offline
top fuel
tex013  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,464
Sydney,Australia
my 8 3/4 called i quits for the second time in the 11.4 range
i put a strange dana in it through drdiff
Tex


New best ET 10.259@129.65 .
New best MPH 130.32
Finally fitted a solid cam,
stepped it up a bit more
3690lbs through the mufflers
New World block 3780lbs 10.278@130.80 . Wowser 10.253@130.24 footbraking from 1500rpm
Power by Tex's Automotive
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1