Is it possible to improve the mpg?
#1407355
03/23/13 09:21 PM
03/23/13 09:21 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,590 Piqua, Ohio
dodgeram440
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,590
Piqua, Ohio
|
Ok, so like I posted a couple weeks ago, I've given up on the 440 swap. Sold a few of the parts and the engine and trans may be sold Easter weekend. I still have the bb truck headers and mount brackets available. This leads me to my question. I'm considering a job change soon, but it's going to involve a weekly drive of about 80 miles one way. Since the old beast would be once again my daily (or weekly, actually) driver, the 10-14 mpg is really gonna suck. I'm looking for advice and suggestions on what I can do to increase that even a little bit. Here is what I'm working with: The patient is an 86 D100 shortbed, 2wd, 318 auto as seen in the sig pic below. The truck is 95% stock with the only mods being the 2 1/2" full dual exhaust (planning ahead for the 440) and a distributor swap to eliminate the factory spark control computer. Still has the original carb which is not a feedback model. I can't remember what I did about the vacuum for the advance on the dist, but if I remember, it was an issue I left unresolved. I haven't driven the truck in nearly 2 years, but I will be waking her up next weekend. I do think it is running a bit rich as the bumper had been turning black over the pipes, and it does have that typical hesitation/bog that I have never been able to work out. I saw a post not too long ago about another member having a similar issue and he fixed it, but I couldn't get a response on exactly what he did to it. Something about the power piston I think. Would this also cause it to run rich? The last time I adjusted anything, I used a vacuum guage and adjusted for highest vacuum. So the basic questions are: Do I need ported or direct vacuum for the vacuum advance? How do I fix the hesitation/bog? Could it possibly be adjusted ok at idle but rich under power? Is there anything else I can do to help with the milage? TIA P.S. Since I'm no longer putting the 440 in it, do I need to change my name?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to improve the mpg?
[Re: NITROUSN]
#1407359
03/23/13 10:27 PM
03/23/13 10:27 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,632 Florida STAYcation
IcorkSOAK
Financed his waterbed
|
Financed his waterbed
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 30,632
Florida STAYcation
|
Quote:
Did you ever pull the intake and clean the cross over passage?
x 99 ...... A engines are famous for plugging-up the intake heat crossover. How HOT does it get?
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to improve the mpg?
[Re: IcorkSOAK]
#1407360
03/23/13 10:58 PM
03/23/13 10:58 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291 Kent, Wa
340SHORTY
Truck Nut
|
Truck Nut
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291
Kent, Wa
|
tune the engine to the best you can. change the auto trans for a OD 833 and you should break the 20 MPG average..
I am truckless..
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to improve the mpg?
[Re: poorboy]
#1407362
03/23/13 11:42 PM
03/23/13 11:42 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,064 Iowa
76dodgeboy
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,064
Iowa
|
Quote:
I would also consider some kind of bed cover. Of the bunch of Dodge trucks I've had over the years, about 1/2 of them gained at least a couple mpg if the tailgate was down or removed. if your truck falls into that group, a bed cover solves the issue and you still have a useable bed. Gene
They did that on myth buster. Tailgate down got worse than tailgate shut.
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to improve the mpg?
[Re: dodgeram440]
#1407363
03/24/13 12:38 AM
03/24/13 12:38 AM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487 Florida
scratchnfotraction
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
|
318, worn out q-jet, a999 HS/LU trans, headers/duels, 8 1/4-2.76 gear, 235/75/15 tires. 19+ mpg at 55 mph 80 miles round trip to work x5days went to a 727 HS non lock up trans and seems to stay the same this past week for work on milage. same thing,set timing with vac gauge for highest reading,fine tuning it with the idle mixture screws, set curb idle at 650/750 rpm use ported vac on the dist unhook and plug when tuning. most times mine have wound up around 10-14 degrees BTDC 750 rpm. I just slaped a stock cast iron 4-v intake on the 302# headed 318 with the q-jet. and mind you it does have a small lunati roller cam so it runs like a teen should run. drive it like GrandMa and keep it under 60 mph with nice slow take off from dead stops. give the finger as the speed junkies go around you. I remember that post,it was the power piston stuck in the up position IIRC, that will make one run rich and have a bog off the line with light throttle they can stick up/down/middle ways and cuse poor performance. also open the carb to make sure it has not suck charcoil from the canister into the carb bowl and clogged things up in it. if you stay with a BBD carb get the oldest carb you can find 68-75 are much better to work with.IMHO
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to improve the mpg?
[Re: scratchnfotraction]
#1407364
03/24/13 12:42 AM
03/24/13 12:42 AM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487 Florida
scratchnfotraction
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 15,487
Florida
|
did I mention q-jet?? I picked my 440 truck up from 10 mpg to 13 mpg going from 600 eddy/3.91 to 750 q-jet/3.23. should gain a couple more with a 2.76 did you use a reman points dist when converting? i would get a points dist and run the points or a conversion in it. then ported vac to the advance can.
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to improve the mpg?
[Re: scratchnfotraction]
#1407367
03/24/13 11:00 PM
03/24/13 11:00 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,590 Piqua, Ohio
dodgeram440
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,590
Piqua, Ohio
|
Current tires are 255/70/15, not sure about the gears in the stock 8 1/4, but I'm thinking 3:23. I think it was listed on the underhood sticker. Will have to check again next weekend.
Would this 86 have the 302 heads and roller cam? Don't really think this would improve my situation one way or the other, I was just curious if it's what I had.
Would a four barrel be an improvement over the 2bbl? I still have the t-quad from the 440. Would that be too big for the little 318 if I got a manifold? I never did remove the intake to clean out the passages. But it also doesn't run hot.
I think my problem with the vacuum advance was that I didn't have a ported vacuum source. It was full time vacuum. I've thought of getting an older carter bbd carb, either used or reman. Biggest problem always comes down to money. I can dream until Jesus comes back, but that isn't gonna get me anywhere. I guess I'm just gonna have to bite the bullet one of these days and make a decision on what I'm really going to do.
Scratch, the distributor I used was one of those Chinese ready-to-run dizzy's off ebay. Been trouble free so far and the most notable improvement I've seen with it is the once shaky tach needle is now steady as a rock.
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to improve the mpg?
[Re: 76dodgeboy]
#1407368
03/24/13 11:02 PM
03/24/13 11:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,838 Freeport IL USA
poorboy
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,838
Freeport IL USA
|
Quote:
Quote:
I would also consider some kind of bed cover. Of the bunch of Dodge trucks I've had over the years, about 1/2 of them gained at least a couple mpg if the tailgate was down or removed. if your truck falls into that group, a bed cover solves the issue and you still have a useable bed. Gene
They did that on myth buster. Tailgate down got worse than tailgate shut.
I really give a rats butt what myth busters did or did not find.
I know that out of at least 10 73-93 Dodge trucks, about 1/2 of them picked up a couple mpg with the tail gate down or off. Back years ago, I drove my trucks about 10,000 miles a year, year around. I lived 10 miles out of the town I worked at, and drove them to work 5-6 days a week. My next job was 30 miles from home, and I made that trip 5-6 days a week. I lived at that out of town house for 16 years and Dodge trucks were always there and were used as normal transportation. For the record, there was never any rhyme or reason to the gas mileage improvement, it either happened or it didn't, and it didn't take more then a couple tanks of gas to know for sure, the difference was an extra day of driving on a tank of gas.
I don't know if his truck will respond with better mpg or worse, but it sure is a cheap, easy thing to try. Gene
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to improve the mpg?
[Re: dodgeram440]
#1407369
03/24/13 11:49 PM
03/24/13 11:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,432 UPPER MICHIGAN, MARQUETTE COUN...
NITROUSN
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,432
UPPER MICHIGAN, MARQUETTE COUN...
|
Quote:
I never did remove the intake to clean out the passages.
All I will tell you is if the passage is plugged you will have a lazy running, hesitating, poor mpg pig. All the other junk is just a band aid. Fix the core problem. I fixed these problems since 1972. Why people will not listen is beyond comprehension. Should have this section titled the axe man fixes, or cave mans garage.
|
|
|
Re: Is it possible to improve the mpg?
[Re: NITROUSN]
#1407373
03/25/13 08:18 AM
03/25/13 08:18 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,590 Piqua, Ohio
dodgeram440
OP
master
|
OP
master
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,590
Piqua, Ohio
|
Nitrousn, not trying to argue with you here. Like you said, you've done this since 72. I would just like a little more clarification for better understanding. What confuses me most about your advise is all the people who purposely block off that passage with no ill effects. I realize that's mostly done for performance applications, but if I'm understanding the logic right that shouldn't matter.
If I understand the purpose of the crossover correctly, it is to warm the manifold and air charge when cold by directing hot exhaust gasses thru the intake underneath the carb plenum. I can see where warming the air charge on a cold winter Ohio morning would be a benefit, but in my situation, the hesitation occurs winter or summer and first start in the morning or after driving for 30 miles. And although it would be really great, I'm not going to buy the 10 mpg improvement claimed by Doc Fiberglass. I could see a small mileage increase, but that much would be a small miracle.
I probably should have done this years ago when you first suggested it, but I didn't and now I'm moving into a situation where it's going to be prohibitive. I'm moving into an apartment complex and they generally tend to frown on major engine work like that. If I can get them to allow me to remove the intake, it will probably be a one time deal, so I need to decide if I'm going to stick with this 2 bbl or go with a 4 bbl. The 2 bbl would be cheaper, but I would rather have the 4 bbl. Either way, it's not anything that's going to happen soon. Right now I'm just looking for possible tuning advice that would improve the drivability and increase the mileage even just a little.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|