Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? #13768
12/21/04 04:01 PM
12/21/04 04:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
F
frank Offline OP
top fuel
frank  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
Getting ready to do the front end. I have a complete polygraphite kit from PST but I've heard that you should use rubber bushings in the lower control arms. Whats the advantage of rubber in the LCA's?

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: frank] #13769
12/21/04 04:51 PM
12/21/04 04:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,336
central New Jersey
D
dbdartman Offline
master
dbdartman  Offline
master
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,336
central New Jersey
SOME people claim the bushing comes out of the shell easily, causing the alignment to change. I've been running poly lower bushings since the mid 80's myself & have NEVER had one little bit of trouble with them in 4 different cars. As a matter of fact, if you understand the concept: "for every action there's an opposite & equal reaction" then look at how the front end is layed out, you'll see that it's all but impossible for the bushing pull out of the shells.

Now, let's hear the naysayers scream about how bad poly bushings are... (they wear out too soon, they transmit too much force through then hurting the chassis, they transmit too much vibration making the ride bad, they easily come apart when used in the lower control arms, etc., etc., etc....)

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: dbdartman] #13770
12/21/04 04:56 PM
12/21/04 04:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,619
Almost Heaven
B_Body_Bob Offline
Master of nothing
B_Body_Bob  Offline
Master of nothing

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,619
Almost Heaven
Yeah the real advantage of using rubber is that you won't have people telling you what a mistake you made by installing poly.


Everybody makes fun of a hillbilly until they need something fixed
Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: B_Body_Bob] #13771
12/21/04 05:50 PM
12/21/04 05:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,020
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,020
U.S.S.A.
...


running up my post count some more .
Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: JohnRR] #13772
12/21/04 07:58 PM
12/21/04 07:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,823
Between Houston & Galveston TX
SattyNoCar Offline
Smarter than no class Flappergass by a mile
SattyNoCar  Offline
Smarter than no class Flappergass by a mile

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,823
Between Houston & Galveston TX
With remarks like these, I'm not even gonna post about the problems I had.


John

The dream is dead, long live the dream.......😥
Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: SattyNoCar] #13773
12/21/04 08:55 PM
12/21/04 08:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 580
columbus,ohio
P
prorunner1 Offline
super street
prorunner1  Offline
super street
P

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 580
columbus,ohio
post them,post them.

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: frank] #13774
12/21/04 09:40 PM
12/21/04 09:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
F
frank Offline OP
top fuel
frank  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
Well I have them so I may as well use them. Is there anything else I should replace while the fronts apart? Somthing that's not in the kit?

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: frank] #13775
12/21/04 10:34 PM
12/21/04 10:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,405
Southern, Ca.
69DartGT Offline
moparts member
69DartGT  Offline
moparts member

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,405
Southern, Ca.
I used a PST kit on my Dart over two years ago and zero problems. I did change out the inner tie rod ends also. I think the kit only comes with the outers, used new tie rods also.

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: 69DartGT] #13776
12/21/04 11:08 PM
12/21/04 11:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
F
frank Offline OP
top fuel
frank  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
What about the pitman arm and center link. Do they ever wear out? There has to be some wear on the pivot points

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: frank] #13777
12/21/04 11:12 PM
12/21/04 11:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,593
Eagle, Idaho
Neil Online content
The Doctor is in.
Neil  Online Content
The Doctor is in.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,593
Eagle, Idaho
Pitman and idler arms need replaced.

Centerlink is a non-wear item.

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: Neil] #13778
12/21/04 11:22 PM
12/21/04 11:22 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
F
frank Offline OP
top fuel
frank  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
copy thanks. What do you think for LCA bushings; poly or rubber?

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: frank] #13779
12/21/04 11:59 PM
12/21/04 11:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Clair_Davis Offline
master
Clair_Davis  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
To me, there are 2 advantages of the rubber LCA bushings over any polyurethane LCA bushing. First, they increase spring rate since the rubber twists in the bushing shells. I think E-berg popped off something like 20 in-lbs extra spring rate over the sliding poly bushings. If you're upgrading t-bars, that may not be a big deal, but if you aren't, the reduced effective spring rate may be noticible.
Second, the rubber bushings are bonded to the shells, which are press-fit to the LCA pivot stud. That locks the LCA in place, and takes care of much of the production tolerances you may or may not find in the suspension. Poly bushings do not do this, and are designed to slide. If all of your suspension is set up right, you won't have a problem.

IMHO, if you're just going to be driving the car, put rubber LCA bushings in. If you're going to be pounding on the car, or driving in a more sporting way, use poly. Be prepared for squeaks, though, especially when it's cold out. After you've driven a bit, the squeaks tend to go away. And if you DO use poly, measure how your strut rods relate to the K-member. Until I sorted that out, I had a helluva time getting a decent alignment in my car. YMMV...

Clair (no rubber bushings anywhere on the Valiant)

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: frank] #13780
12/22/04 04:35 PM
12/22/04 04:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,015
Frederick, MD
7
71charger Offline
top fuel
71charger  Offline
top fuel
7

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,015
Frederick, MD
I'm at about eight years with poly LCA bushings. Still waiting for any squeaking. If you put in the poly lube the crap out of them when you install them. I did and I haven't had any problems or squeaks.

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: SattyNoCar] #13781
12/22/04 05:02 PM
12/22/04 05:02 PM

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
Anonymous
Unregistered
A



Quote:

With remarks like these, I'm not even gonna post about the problems I had.




Oh, come on and do it... You and I both should have kept a word file of the reasons why the poly is not good for the lower control arm unless some precautionary steps are made.

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? #13782
12/22/04 06:56 PM
12/22/04 06:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,823
Between Houston & Galveston TX
SattyNoCar Offline
Smarter than no class Flappergass by a mile
SattyNoCar  Offline
Smarter than no class Flappergass by a mile

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,823
Between Houston & Galveston TX
Yeah, I need a wordfile I can just link to everytime this question comes up.

I had poly LCA bushings in my wagon for a short period of time. The ride was down right SCARY! Any kind of bump or dip in the road, I never knew which way the car was gonna go. The bushings were NOT holding the LCA in place, making the car feel as if I had bald bias-ply tires on the front (darting about, following ruts, etc)

The problem always happened when the suspension was unloaded, ie; the inside wheel when making a turn, the rebound from hitting a bump, etc, etc. On smooth, fresh pavement, all was great.

Oh, and I was getting a real bad CLUNK sound during this too.

Putting the wagon up on a lift (with the suspension just hanging), I WAS able to physically move the LCA back at the bushing using a pry bar. Not a lot, if I had to guess about an 1/8th of an inch or so, but isn't ANY fore-aft movement bad? Doing nothing to the front end except swapping out the lower bushings back to rubber, eliminated ALL the problems I was having.

Now, let me take my best guess as to why things were moving on me as a lot of people seem to not have any problems. '73-up B-bodies have an 'isolated' crossmember for the T-bar mounts. This crossmember is mounted with rubber bushings. It can't move a lot, but it CAN move. I think when the LCA was moving due to the poly bushing, the crossmember was moving some too, exaggerating what was going on. I didn't think to look while the car was on the lift, but its the only explaination I can think of as to why things were moving so much.

If you use them and have no problems, great! The point of my posting is only to show that there is a chance of having a problem with the poly LCA bushing, its not meant as a bash on poly bushings in general.


John

The dream is dead, long live the dream.......😥
Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: SattyNoCar] #13783
12/22/04 08:48 PM
12/22/04 08:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Satilite73, Listen here Buster, I have the Polys and ,,, Just Kidding. thanks for posting. I have been considering the Polys myself so I like to see everybodys experience. I definatly appreciated yours. I may just stick with the rubbers. I have the 73 A Body Kmember so maybe the polys wouldent be a problem. But your problem with the LCA sliding back and forth was not good and down right dangerous. I dont know what would cause that. I would think the polys would keep the LCA more perfectly in a stable in its travel. But I am not at all familer with the way either of those bushings go together. I am going to learn though because I just peeled what was left of my 1973 factory rubber LCA bushings out by hand. And there wasnt much bushing left. I pretty much made my last pass of the year with no LCA bushings at all. Again thanks for your input. mike


73 Sport 440, 509 cam w/Eddys 3.91 and 28.1"/27.3 tire. Et. 60 ft. 1.435, 1/8th. 6.61 @ 101.80 mph. 1/4. 10.472 / 127.78 mph. 2950# race/with me,and pump gas.
Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: Sport440] #13784
12/22/04 10:54 PM
12/22/04 10:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,323
NY NY
3
340duster340 Offline
master
340duster340  Offline
master
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,323
NY NY
my 30k mile duster still has the original rubber lca bushings and they are fine, so thats what i am putting in when i do a v8 swap and rebuild the front end. USE MOOG problem solver series bushings, they are the best if you decide to keep the rubber style.

in my opinion you really only need the poly if you agressively race the car.



1966 Dart GT ...down to only 1 mopar for the first time in 15 years!
Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: 340duster340] #13785
12/22/04 11:19 PM
12/22/04 11:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
F
frank Offline OP
top fuel
frank  Offline OP
top fuel
F

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,138
tucson az
What's the difference between "problem solver" and stock rubber LCA bushings?

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: Sport440] #13786
12/22/04 11:28 PM
12/22/04 11:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Clair_Davis Offline
master
Clair_Davis  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,204
Fort Worth, TX
Quote:

...I have the 73 A Body Kmember so maybe the polys wouldent be a problem. But your problem with the LCA sliding back and forth was not good and down right dangerous. I dont know what would cause that. I would think the polys would keep the LCA more perfectly in a stable in its travel...
mike




Mike,
What makes the poly lowers funky is they won't cover any other problems in the suspension like the rubber bushings will. The problem I had was not with the poly bushings themselves, but with the MP poly STRUT ROD BUSHINGS. They appear to have been cast from molds for the original rubber strut rod bushings. Cool, right? Exactly the same as OE... *Except* that the poly SRB's don't compress much at all, and the rubber ones DO. What happened was two things. First, when I torqued down the nut for the strut rod bushing (this on a 73+ K-member, too), the bushings didn't compress as far as the would have if they were rubber. The second thing that happened was that the steel sleeve that came with the bushings was about 1/4" longer than it should have been, so the nut bottomed on the sleeve before it even finished compressing the bushing. So, between these two issues, the strut rod was effectively longer than it should have been. This pushes the LCA towards the rear of the car, and since the poly bushing can't resist the push, it slides back on the LCA stud. Variable suspension geometry...
The fix for me was to measure how long I needed the strut rod to be when everything was torqued, and then to trim the REAR strut rod bushing half by whatever amount that was. Also, trim down the bushing sleeve so the bushing would compress properly. With those two problems fixed, my Valiant drives like a dream. A squeaky dream, but a dream none the less. The attached photo shows the rear bushing after being trimmed, and the sleeve with about 1/4" hacked off with the wheel o' death.
So, you can use the poly lowers and they WILL work great. You just have to invest some more time and thought in the system than you could get away with using rubber bushings.

Clair

Re: POLY LOWER CONTROL ARM BUSHINGS? [Re: frank] #13787
12/22/04 11:36 PM
12/22/04 11:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,323
NY NY
3
340duster340 Offline
master
340duster340  Offline
master
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,323
NY NY
Quote:

What's the difference between "problem solver" and stock rubber LCA bushings?




"problem solver series" is pretty much the best stuff MOOG sells. sometimes original equipment is/was MOOG.


1966 Dart GT ...down to only 1 mopar for the first time in 15 years!
Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1