Re: More Power---Hyd. Roller or Solid Flat Tappet?
[Re: kzinge1]
#1324443
10/22/12 08:40 PM
10/22/12 08:40 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648 aotearoa
rebel
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,648
aotearoa
|
Quote:
Sounds like the roller is the way to go! Good because it will actually be cheaper for me. Just have to limit the RPM to 6k.
those Stealth heads will help with that.
|
|
|
Re: More Power---Hyd. Roller or Solid Flat Tappet?
[Re: rebel]
#1324444
10/22/12 08:54 PM
10/22/12 08:54 PM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 513 Temperance, MI
68 HEMI GTS
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 513
Temperance, MI
|
i have a hyd roller in a 440 i just build. im a little less than impressed. its probably gonna be coming out for a solid flat tappet in the near future.
68 Dart GTS "HEMI" 10.30 @ 131 pump gas street car 3780# 69 Roadrunner 511 six pack 10.92 drive to track street car
|
|
|
Re: More Power---Hyd. Roller or Solid Flat Tappet?
[Re: 68 HEMI GTS]
#1324445
10/22/12 09:19 PM
10/22/12 09:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,929 Akron, Ohio
ProSport
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,929
Akron, Ohio
|
I vote for the solid flat tappet for sure, but add 1.6 rockers.
1970 Challenger, all aluminum 528 Hemi, HDK suspension, Tremec 5 speed manual
|
|
|
Re: More Power---Hyd. Roller or Solid Flat Tappet?
[Re: kzinge1]
#1324446
10/22/12 09:33 PM
10/22/12 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 989 WI, USA
67dodge67
mopar addict
|
mopar addict
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 989
WI, USA
|
Quote:
I do not know exactly what the heads flow. They are untouched stealths so I think they flow a little less than the RPM heads. The solid cam is relatively low lift but has good duration. Also, I am not limited to that cam, I can buy another one. The only thing that worries me about the hydraulic is the RPM limit. I just tore up my 511 stroker motor after spinning it to about 6300 with the hyd roller. But its low maintenance, I have all the parts for it and don't have to worry about wiping a cam. Just have to set my rev limiter to 6K. Static Compression is 11-1
When I was looking into a different cam set up, I was going back and forth with a solid vs a hyd roller as you are. I ended up calling Bullet Cams and they set me up with a hyd roller. I'm running eddy rpms (on a 470) vs your heads, they are basically untouched except for a valve job. The specs on my roller are @ 050, 249in 253out gross lift 573. I buzz it up to 6400 and it pulls hard all the way. Bullet is a good company to work with, and were extremely helpful.
Dave
|
|
|
Re: More Power---Hyd. Roller or Solid Flat Tappet?
[Re: kzinge1]
#1324448
10/22/12 10:34 PM
10/22/12 10:34 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,334 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,334
Prospect, PA
|
Quote:
Here's my combo:
426" Wedge, Stealth heads, Harland Sharp rockers, RPM intake, 750 Demon, 2" TTIs Street/ Strip 69 Roadrunner, 3.54 Dana, 727 w/ 3500 stall 9" converter.
I have a Hyd. Roller setup that is .549/.544 lift 242/248 dur. @.050 and also a solid flat Tappet that is .525/.525 lift 248/248 dur. @.050
Which cam would you guys prefer with this setup? Also feel free to recommend something else as well.
Not seeing a huge difference between the two. Do you have the advertised and .200" numbers? The hydraulic is probably slow off the seat and will probably be a little softer at lower rpm than the solid. The Stealth, out of the box flow numbers at .50 and .55 are not much different, so the 0.050" lift advantage of the hydraulic won't mean that much.
Any hydraulic should be able to live trouble free well above 6000 rpm, but I dont see your combinations wanting much more.
|
|
|
Re: More Power---Hyd. Roller or Solid Flat Tappet?
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#1324450
10/23/12 12:22 AM
10/23/12 12:22 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698 NE Oklahoma
Von
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
|
Quote:
I'd wager at least by 1/2 second in the 1/4 mile.
Im assuming your flat tappet is a Comp 294S?? Which is a lazy lobe, 154 @.200. Dont know what brand your hyd roller is, but comparing it to some lobes in the Comp book, Id figure its around 164ish @.200. Id guess .1-.15 et difference at best between the 2.
Last edited by Von; 10/23/12 12:30 AM.
72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72.
Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
|
|
|
Re: More Power---Hyd. Roller or Solid Flat Tappet?
[Re: kzinge1]
#1324454
10/23/12 12:21 PM
10/23/12 12:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
Taking time off to work on my car
|
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Quote:
Also feel free to recommend something else as well.
OK: - More gear -->3.91 - 4.10 - Bigger carb --> 850-ish - Smaller headers --> 1-7/8" - Port the heads, rather than run them "out of the box"
And then - maybe - the hyd. roller cam might be an OK fit... and that depends on the LSA, your compression, etc.
|
|
|
Re: More Power---Hyd. Roller or Solid Flat Tappet?
[Re: BradH]
#1324456
10/23/12 12:58 PM
10/23/12 12:58 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826 NY usa
540challenger
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,826
NY usa
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also feel free to recommend something else as well.
OK: - More gear -->3.91 - 4.10 - Bigger carb --> 850-ish - Smaller headers --> 1-7/8" - Port the heads, rather than run them "out of the box"
And then - maybe - the hyd. roller cam might be an OK fit... and that depends on the LSA, your compression, etc.
Just want to touch one thing hear about the carb
The 750 demon carbs are underrated the 750 flows closer to a 850 cfm carb.
|
|
|
|
|