Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Guess the SB Crank. #1313783
10/01/12 04:38 PM
10/01/12 04:38 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
rtcoronet440 Offline OP
member
rtcoronet440  Offline OP
member

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
I pulled the crank out of my 71 340 this weekend for a refresh. The motor has been rebuilt once before. (Which I knew) The crank on the right is from my motor Cast# 2658278 All the things I find on the net say it is cast. But it sure looks like forged. If you tap it with a hammer it rings like a forged crank. The crank on the left is from a 71 318 Cast #2658393. The one in the middle is a 73 340 Cast Crank that they say has been shot peened cast #3462387. Is the one I pulled out Cast or Forged? The balancer is internally balanced piece cast #3614369. also the rods are for a cast crank #3418645. Has all of this been thrown together or is it right for the motor? I am taking it all to the machine shop on Wed. and want to take all the matched parts. Thanks for your help.

7402497-topviewcrank.JPG (541 downloads)
Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: rtcoronet440] #1313784
10/01/12 04:39 PM
10/01/12 04:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
rtcoronet440 Offline OP
member
rtcoronet440  Offline OP
member

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
next picture

7402498-2cranks.JPG (301 downloads)
Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: rtcoronet440] #1313785
10/01/12 05:04 PM
10/01/12 05:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,895
Florida
Locomotion Offline
master
Locomotion  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,895
Florida
The wide parting line would indicate a forged crank as compared to the thin lines on the other cast cranks. I'm wondering if it could be a 318 truck crank which didn't have lightening holes in the journals. Don't know about the numbers, but process of elimination would point towards the truck crank.

Last edited by Locomotion; 10/01/12 05:08 PM.
Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: Locomotion] #1313786
10/01/12 05:12 PM
10/01/12 05:12 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,719
Space Station #5
471Magnum Offline
master
471Magnum  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,719
Space Station #5
Quote:

The wide parting line would indicate a forged crank as compared to the thin lines on the other cast cranks. I'm wondering if it could be a 318 truck crank which didn't have lightening holes in the journals. Don't know about the numbers, but process of elimination would point towards the truck crank.





Pulled one of these out of my 72 NOM Road Runner. Truck crank, or maybe a later 318 poly.


-Jim

I can fix it... my old man is a television repairman.
He's got the ultimate set of tools... I can fix it.

Currently Mopar-less
Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: 471Magnum] #1313787
10/01/12 05:20 PM
10/01/12 05:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,128
sweden
S
sshemi Offline
top fuel
sshemi  Offline
top fuel
S

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,128
sweden
273???

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: rtcoronet440] #1313788
10/01/12 06:41 PM
10/01/12 06:41 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
rtcoronet440 Offline OP
member
rtcoronet440  Offline OP
member

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
Which one should I use?

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: rtcoronet440] #1313789
10/01/12 07:19 PM
10/01/12 07:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
The 340 crank because it has less rotating inertia.
R.

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: dogdays] #1313790
10/01/12 07:28 PM
10/01/12 07:28 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,396
Pa
Hot 340 Offline
master
Hot 340  Offline
master

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,396
Pa
the left and middle are castings.. the right one is a 318 truck (or poly?) for sure. Use the truck crank, and have the "rod pin" area drilled out to lighten...they usually knock about an inch (or so) hole there and cost around $150.

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: dogdays] #1313791
10/01/12 07:31 PM
10/01/12 07:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,895
Florida
Locomotion Offline
master
Locomotion  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,895
Florida
Quote:

The 340 crank because it has less rotating inertia.
R.




I know cast cranks are actually lighter than a forged crank for the same application. But aside from the extra expense of rebalancing the rotating assembly, won't most or all of that advantage be offest by the extra weight he has to put back in, especially if it's external with the counterweighted balancer and flexplate/converter?

(I'm assuming that the plan is to keep the existing pistons & rods as opposed to lighter versions.)

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: Locomotion] #1313792
10/01/12 07:50 PM
10/01/12 07:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
NONONO! The middle and right are forgings. That should be obvious. Look at the parting line on the crank on the left, it's sharp. Typical casting look. Both the center and right cranks have wide, ground off parting lines customarily seen on forgings. Also, check the shape of the counterweights. Forged counterweights have a more organic shape, they look like kidneys. Cast cranks have square, sharp corners.

Now on to reciprocating and rotating inertia. When MOPAR hung those monster 340 pistons on the ends of the rods on basically a 318 crank, they drilled the crankpin in order to be able to use the crank without external balancing. So any weight removed from the crankpin side, either by weight reduction of the rods, or weight reduction of the crankpin, or weight reduction of the reciprocating weight, allows the counterweight to be SMALLER.

Thus, the drilled crankpin allows for even less rotating inertia becase it doesn't take such a big counterweight to balance it.

R.

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: dogdays] #1313793
10/01/12 08:29 PM
10/01/12 08:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,396
Pa
Hot 340 Offline
master
Hot 340  Offline
master

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,396
Pa
Quote:

NONONO! The middle and right are forgings.


I thought that at first...look at the middle crank closer towards the thrust, particularly the second crankpin.. Its a casting. Not to mention the little "clock" cast into the first crankpin.

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: Hot 340] #1313794
10/01/12 08:35 PM
10/01/12 08:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,053
Bowling Green, KY
C
cudaboy Offline
master
cudaboy  Offline
master
C

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,053
Bowling Green, KY

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: rtcoronet440] #1313795
10/01/12 09:18 PM
10/01/12 09:18 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
rtcoronet440 Offline OP
member
rtcoronet440  Offline OP
member

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
The middle and left crank are cast. I agree the one on the right should be forged but the number on it says it is cast. (which I do not believe.) the rods on it claim to be for a cast crank also. But, They are bushed floating pins.

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: rtcoronet440] #1313796
10/01/12 09:24 PM
10/01/12 09:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,396
Pa
Hot 340 Offline
master
Hot 340  Offline
master

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,396
Pa
Quote:

The middle and left crank are cast. I agree the one on the right should be forged but the number on it says it is cast. (which I do not believe.) the rods on it claim to be for a cast crank also. But, They are bushed floating pins.


Right one is definetly a forging. No doubt about it.

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: rtcoronet440] #1313797
10/01/12 11:46 PM
10/01/12 11:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,658
Detroit area
6PAX Offline
master
6PAX  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,658
Detroit area
Coincidentally, I was just doing a Google search for information on the same subject when I came across this thread. I have the same 2658278 crankshaft that came with a 1973 340 I bought and was trying to find out more about it. It too has all of the features of a forged crank like yours. It seems that the 2658278 part number may have been on both forged and cast cranks. If you scroll down on this chart to where it says 340 in the left column it lists the part number as a 68-73 340 steel crank.

http://www.standardcrankshaft.com/crankshaftkitcatalog.html?sid=4744

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: 6PAX] #1313798
10/02/12 12:19 AM
10/02/12 12:19 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
rtcoronet440 Offline OP
member
rtcoronet440  Offline OP
member

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Illinois, Lawrence County
Wow! Exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: rtcoronet440] #1313799
10/02/12 12:41 AM
10/02/12 12:41 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,895
Florida
Locomotion Offline
master
Locomotion  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,895
Florida
Considering that the 318 steel crank list is exactly the same as the 340 steel crank list, it would appear that the list shows which like-material cranks will physically interchange without regard to original application or balance.

340 cast crank isn't mentioned probably because of it's rather short term of use. It should be late '72 and '73.

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: Locomotion] #1313800
10/02/12 12:47 PM
10/02/12 12:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
Well I'll be.......seeing my optometrist. Yes, the middle is a casting, for sure.

R.

Re: Guess the SB Crank. [Re: rtcoronet440] #1313801
10/02/12 01:45 PM
10/02/12 01:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,307
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,307
Bend,OR USA
Back in the day when NHRA was still racingmodified production cars john Diana told me to try and find a forged steel crank out of a Dodge truck 318-3 motor, it was a lot better than the stock 340 where according to him and the Mopar drag engineers No way I would use a cast steel crank when I had a forged steel crank to use OP, take it to your machine shop and have them magnaflux it to make sure it is still good, no cracks, and have them check the balalnce, if it needs fixing on the balance have them do it I no several NHRA stock class racers that took the 340 rods out and switch to 318 rods along with lightweight pistons, they sat several NHRA class records Light weight(rotating) is better than some heavy weight parts in our motors, as long as they will do the job without failing


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1