|
Re: airwolf sbm 220 heads!!!! for a sb mopar
[Re: Streetwize]
#1300040
09/13/12 04:26 PM
09/13/12 04:26 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 793
Utah
topbrent
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 793
Utah
|
Quote:
StreetWize:
What I'm wondering ( as controversial as it sounds) is why can't we adopt the LS architecture? There are already old school SBC's and even Fords that have built LS frankensteins already. Make a sbm casting that incorporates the LS ports and make a new Cam, intake and headers?
Adapting the LS head to a SBM would be awesome. However, that is a lot of effort just to preserve the motormount location, distributor, oil pan and bellhousing pattern IMHO. If adopting the LS head platform is the idea, you would be better served to just go all the way and install the LS shortblock as well. The factory iron 6.0 blocks can handle over 1000+hp without hesitation. Stronger inherent design.
|
|
|
Re: airwolf sbm 220 heads!!!! for a sb mopar
[Re: Streetwize]
#1300043
10/02/12 07:29 PM
10/02/12 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41
anaheim Ca
Bryce Mulvey
member
|
member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 41
anaheim Ca
|
FYI the 408 dyno test with airwolf 220 heads got moved to Moparts Hot Deals & New Products. Nicely done MR.ModeratorJust tested the New AIRWOLF 220 Small block Mopar heads. The heads work great. The big kicker is they are non offset heads and take all standard LA hardware 408 Mopar 633hp 562 ft lbs with New AIRWOLF 220 Small Block Mopar heads 4.030 bore X 4 inch stroke Diamond Pistons 1/16 1/16 3/16 rings Flat top (11.5 to 1compression) 6.123 h beam rod Crane solid roller 260/266 108 lsa 104 ICL .672 lift with 1.6 rockers Dr J’s Ported Super Victor Holley Ultra hp 950 NEW AIRWOLF 220 Small Block Mopar heads Hooker Chassis headers 1 ¾ tested on 91 octane pump gas http://youtu.be/_AfyrlVkEdk    
Bryce Mulvey
Dr J's Performance
The Home of AIRWOLF Cylinder Heads
|
|
|
Re: airwolf sbm 220 heads!!!! for a sb mopar
[Re: Bryce Mulvey]
#1300044
10/02/12 07:53 PM
10/02/12 07:53 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 614
ont,canada
mopartuner
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 614
ont,canada
|
How do you think this motor would perform with a custom solid flat tappet cam?
410 pump gas solis flat tappet cam 10.95 so far
|
|
|
Re: airwolf sbm 220 heads!!!! for a sb mopar
[Re: Bryce Mulvey]
#1300045
10/02/12 08:05 PM
10/02/12 08:05 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,532
off the grid
340B5
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,532
off the grid
|
The big kicker is they are non offset heads and take all standard LA hardware Now you're talkin!!! That would be great for budget-minded racers who don't want to change everything at once.
Yeah, it's got a smallblock.
|
|
|
Re: airwolf sbm 220 heads!!!! for a sb mopar
[Re: mshred]
#1300047
10/25/12 10:54 AM
10/25/12 10:54 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,128
sweden
sshemi
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,128
sweden
|
Quote:
Anybody thinking of trying these out?
Trying to decide if these are worth an upgrade over my ported RHS heads 
im in that situation also.
i think the weight savings witout any power loss might be worth it.
but i got some chassie upgrades to do first.
it makes me think twice because they are cast in china.
|
|
|
Re: airwolf sbm 220 heads!!!! for a sb mopar
[Re: sshemi]
#1300048
10/25/12 10:56 AM
10/25/12 10:56 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,433
Toronto
mshred
master
|
master
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,433
Toronto
|
Quote:
Quote:
Anybody thinking of trying these out?
Trying to decide if these are worth an upgrade over my ported RHS heads
im in that situation also.
i think the weight savings witout any power loss might be worth it.
but i got some chassie upgrades to do first.
it makes me think twice because they are cast in china.
He pm'ed me on another forum and told me they have a lifetime warranty against any casting flaws
|
|
|
Re: airwolf sbm 220 heads!!!! for a sb mopar
[Re: OUTLAW MOPAR]
#1300050
11/22/12 06:52 PM
11/22/12 06:52 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,945
Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,945
Weddington, N.C.
|
I got to compare the airwolfs to my Shady Dell stage 2's. I have a question into Bryce about the components so I'll wait to hear back. The intake ports are larger than the Shadys and the 2.08 intake should definately help up top. Bryce does some interesting (read that as cool ) work at the bowl/runner transition that I won't go into...but I like it and understand how it works. But IMO unless you're planning a big (>255-ish) @.050 solid roller AND your combo is under ~3400 pounds with an auto the Shady 2's might work as well or better. Light car with a lot of gear will like these 220 intakes. My car is around 2900 w/d so I think these will be worth some useable Hp/tq up top 
Last edited by Streetwize; 11/22/12 06:54 PM.
|
|
|
Re: airwolf sbm 220 heads!!!! for a sb mopar
[Re: Darryls-Demon]
#1300052
11/22/12 10:03 PM
11/22/12 10:03 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,945
Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,945
Weddington, N.C.
|
I do on a sub 10.5:1 combo, the real beauty of the SDSS 2's is the flow is still great for the high velocity port design. But a fair number of street compression mild gear moderate weight 408-416 combos might do better overall than with these bigger ports. The SDSS2's keep up fairly well up to about .400 lift
There's no doubt to me the airwolfs have more flow/hp potential.... but they may not be the best Et wise for milder heavier flat tappet combos as I described where average torque through the middle contributes more to the ET. The airwolfs have a very broad torque curve as evidenced on Steve D's dyno mule, but not every combo will ET best with a port that peaks torque at close to 5k...unless your also willing to gear and vert your combo accordingly
As I said I think Bryce is very clever and a highly talented head porter, there's no doubt in my mind.
Last edited by Streetwize; 11/22/12 10:23 PM.
|
|
|
Re: airwolf sbm 220 heads!!!! for a sb mopar
[Re: MIKES_DUSTER]
#1300057
11/26/12 06:19 PM
11/26/12 06:19 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 793
Utah
topbrent
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 793
Utah
|
Quote:
MIKES_DUSTER:
Are they cheaper then the eddys??
Less expensive than what Hughes charges for a set of CNC ported Edelbrock castings.
Hughes asks $2831.74 for their CNC offerings plus the price of a decent spring upgrade. http://www.hughesengines.com/Index/produ...mp;partid=27660
*
This is from the post over on "Moparts Hot Deals & New Products" that is currently running on the AirWolf heads:
https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/show...rt=all&vc=1
Quote:
Quote:
How much are they!!???
Bryce Mulvey
AIRWOLF 220 Small Block Mopar
HYD roller spring complete $ 2200.00
Solid Roller Springs Complete Ti retainers $2600.00
Heads come with Manley race flow valves and Manley springs
STD Installation Height of 1.950
AIRWOLF 220 SBM
2.08 intake 1.60 exhaust 45 ° seats
2.48 CSA @ pinch( my prototype was 2.52 but it did not work out on the CNC production head)
Intake Flow numbers @ 28” test @ Reher Morrison
.100 72 cfm
.200 144 cfm
.300 219 cfm
.400 273 cfm
.500 301 cfm
.600 312 cfm
.700 316 cfm
.800 319 cfm
.900 321 cfm
1.00 326 cfm
|
|
|
|
|
