ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
#128721
09/27/08 05:33 PM
09/27/08 05:33 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164 CH
plyrr69
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
CH
|
Hello together
I search pictures an details from the stock sixpackengines, shortblock assembly. Does anybody has pictures of original shortblocks, maybe with a piston on the top position. Does anybody measured the distance from the top piston position to the blocks deck height?
Tx for answer...
David
___________________________
.......plymouth tells it like it is...!
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#128725
09/28/08 12:58 AM
09/28/08 12:58 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347 Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT
Management Trainee
|
Management Trainee
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
|
Quote:
69 and 70 had different pistons. Which exact year?
They also had different connecting rods.....And crankshafts....And harmonic balancers....And...
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: 1_WILD_RT]
#128726
09/28/08 03:21 AM
09/28/08 03:21 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318 Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
|
Quote:
Quote:
69 and 70 had different pistons. Which exact year?
They also had different connecting rods.....And crankshafts....And harmonic balancers....And...
All of which would not be likely to show up on a pic of the short block. His post was mainly asking about pistons...
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#128727
09/28/08 03:42 AM
09/28/08 03:42 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347 Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT
Management Trainee
|
Management Trainee
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
|
Quote:
All of which would not be likely to show up on a pic of the short block. His post was mainly asking about pistons...
The Balancer is obvious from twenty feet...The rods are obvious if the pan is off...
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#128728
09/28/08 03:43 AM
09/28/08 03:43 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164 CH
plyrr69
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
CH
|
I have a Sixpack 69 1/2 and the friend of mine got a 70, thats why both are interesting for us. The most important point is: how do they come on a C/R 10.5:1...
___________________________
.......plymouth tells it like it is...!
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: sixbbl69]
#128730
09/28/08 08:45 AM
09/28/08 08:45 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA
62maxwgn
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436
Blair County,PA
|
Quote:
at least you have the better of the 2 engines.the 69 sixpack is faster and lighter.i think the 70 intake is heavier then the whole 69 engine. the 70 sixpack and the hemi is what dragged these cars down.more for looks then speed and performance.
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: plyrr69]
#128731
09/28/08 11:42 AM
09/28/08 11:42 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,050 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,050
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
I have a Sixpack 69 1/2 and the friend of mine got a 70, thats why both are interesting for us. The most important point is: how do they come on a C/R 10.5:1...
That's the RATED compression ratio they weren't actually that high .
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: plyrr69]
#128732
09/28/08 12:07 PM
09/28/08 12:07 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 190 Wilmington,NC
I go fast
member
|
member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 190
Wilmington,NC
|
Quote:
I have a Sixpack 69 1/2 and the friend of mine got a 70, thats why both are interesting for us. The most important point is: how do they come on a C/R 10.5:1...
69 1/2 is rated 10.2:1,70 is rated 10.5:1.Different pistons with valve reliefs.
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: plyrr69]
#128734
09/28/08 07:29 PM
09/28/08 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,050 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,050
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have a Sixpack 69 1/2 and the friend of mine got a 70, thats why both are interesting for us. The most important point is: how do they come on a C/R 10.5:1...
69 1/2 is rated 10.2:1,70 is rated 10.5:1.Different pistons with valve reliefs.
where is this information from, do you have pistonpics?
70 the piston is a flat top and has 4 valves reliefs , it should be about .020 below the deck
69 is a flat top NO VALVE reliefs and will be about .040 below the deck
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: JohnRR]
#128735
09/30/08 12:43 AM
09/30/08 12:43 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164 CH
plyrr69
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
CH
|
Very interesting, anyone got pics?
___________________________
.......plymouth tells it like it is...!
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: plyrr69]
#128736
09/30/08 09:45 AM
09/30/08 09:45 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,050 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,050
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Very interesting, anyone got pics?
I don't mean to be a stick in the mud but have you never seen a flat top piston ???
Here , I heisted this from another thread , it's not an original piston but this is what a 70-71 6pk piston looks like , the 69 piston is the same WITHOUT the 4 notches ...
the picture is too big to put in the post , click the link
https://board.moparts.org/ubbthreads/upload2/4716100-Pistons.jpg
Oh and just so you know , there is NO direct replacement available for the 69 engine , at least nothing that is shelf stock anywhere. Most people use the 70 -71 piston and it puts the piston where it would be for factory 69 NHRA blueprint spec , but thats not correct as the factory built them so you will have to get a custom if you want to mimic the factory build .
Last edited by Johnrr; 09/30/08 09:52 AM.
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: JohnRR]
#128737
09/30/08 11:03 AM
09/30/08 11:03 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164 CH
plyrr69
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
CH
|
Hello John...
No, not an Original Sixpack... and i want to see the Deckclearance to see if we are making a calculation error, or if there are that much differences... It looks like there are either wrong informations about the C/R or there is an error our calculation....
And if i do my engine it has to look and be as original as possible...
tx dave
ps i have a 108 piston in my block!!! But this is an R/T block..
Last edited by plyrr69; 09/30/08 11:07 AM.
___________________________
.......plymouth tells it like it is...!
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: plyrr69]
#128738
09/30/08 12:26 PM
09/30/08 12:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,050 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,050
U.S.S.A.
|
third piston from the right is at TDC , thats about .020 in the hole . this confuses me , maybe something in your translation ??? Quote:
ps i have a 108 piston in my block!!! But this is an R/T block..
are you saying your piston is .108 BELOW the deck ? if so it's because you have the wrong piston , probably is the part number 2266 on it?
Also an R/T block ???? There is NOTHING SPECIAL about a 6pk block vs. any other 440 block of the same era other than what is stamped on it .
|
|
|
Re: ORIGNIAL 440 SIXPACK ENGINES SPECS...
[Re: JohnRR]
#128739
09/30/08 02:06 PM
09/30/08 02:06 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164 CH
plyrr69
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
CH
|
Sorry, i didn't write correct...
This is all what my piston is... 2853108
___________________________
.......plymouth tells it like it is...!
|
|
|
|
|