Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
.035" Quench for steel-rod big block... #1282848
08/10/12 12:22 PM
08/10/12 12:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline OP
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline OP
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
This is a 3.75"-stroke over-bored 440, steel rods, and forged pistons w/ .006" clearance. It's expected to turn 7000-7200 through the traps. I've traditionally run zero deck height + .040"-thick gaskets, but was wondering if there would be any benefit to tightening it up to .035" w/ a thinner MLS gasket. There's never been any indications of piston-to-head interference w/ .040".

Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: BradH] #1282849
08/10/12 12:44 PM
08/10/12 12:44 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,213
New York
polyspheric Offline
master
polyspheric  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,213
New York
IIRC Jenkins said that if you don't need more knock suppression tighter clearance increases pumping loss.
How much probably varies with the quench surface area and how the edges are prepared.


Boffin Emeritus
Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: BradH] #1282850
08/10/12 04:18 PM
08/10/12 04:18 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
P
Performance Only Offline
top fuel
Performance Only  Offline
top fuel
P

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
i don't personally feel there's enough benefit to reduce the quench to .035 vs. .040 thre's most certainly a downside though if the piston starts contacting the head. as the bore and piston wears over time, the piston skirt to wall clearance will increase and hence more piston rock.


machine shop owner and engine builder
Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: Performance Only] #1282851
08/10/12 06:40 PM
08/10/12 06:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
Dan has a really good point, so if you do it you had better be taking the heads off regularly to see if there are any witness marks. I really don't think you'll see more than a couple of hundredths which can get lost in the tuneup and track conditions.

R.

Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: dogdays] #1282852
08/10/12 06:49 PM
08/10/12 06:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
Not worth the risks with just a .005 change.

Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: BradH] #1282853
08/10/12 09:59 PM
08/10/12 09:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12
MN
7
73outlaw Offline
member
73outlaw  Offline
member
7

Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12
MN
Just last week buddy of mine gernaded his 451,guess how??!! I pulled it down and it has .030-.035 piston to head clearance,not good now have a pile iron. Never made a pass down the track. WTF was the builder thinkin?????
I would say less than 5hp is in .005 keep her north of .040

Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: 73outlaw] #1282854
08/10/12 11:27 PM
08/10/12 11:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
If you try, suggest you check all 8 holes for clearance as slight variaton cylinder to cylinder could cause a big oops. I wouldn't try it.

Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: ahy] #1282855
08/10/12 11:44 PM
08/10/12 11:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 795
Glendale Az
D
Darryls-Demon Offline
super stock
Darryls-Demon  Offline
super stock
D

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 795
Glendale Az
My .030 over 440 is at .035 before piston rock but the motor has only seen 6800 RPMs and it has Crower steel billet rods.

Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: 73outlaw] #1282856
08/11/12 12:27 AM
08/11/12 12:27 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 103
3
340roadrunner Offline
member
340roadrunner  Offline
member
3

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 103
Quote:

Just last week buddy of mine gernaded his 451,guess how??!! I pulled it down and it has .030-.035 piston to head clearance,not good now have a pile iron. Never made a pass down the track. WTF was the builder thinkin?????
I would say less than 5hp is in .005 keep her north of .040




wow that really sucks for your buddy! Sounds like hes a dork though... can't he tear down his own engine? Next you'll tell me his cars pink or something.. I agree .035 quench is too little.

Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: BradH] #1282857
08/11/12 01:25 PM
08/11/12 01:25 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,335
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,335
Bend,OR USA
Brad, rock the pistons both ways and shoot for .039 piston to head for pump gas with .002+ rod bearing clearances I have never ran rod bearings tighter than .0025 and I have seen witness marks on my piston edges my pump gas street motor with .003+ rod bearing clearances and .039 piston to head clearances cold on the edges I switched to a set of .042 Cometics MLS


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: BradH] #1282858
08/11/12 03:02 PM
08/11/12 03:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,932
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,932
NC
There is not a lot of gain, and you would have to take lots of care and measurements to see if it would be successful, IMO.

I run with 0.037"-0.038" piston to head and it was fine. You could see it keeping the quench area of the pistons cleaner than the part under the combustion chamber.

My 2-cents for your application is have it in the range 0.037"-0.040"

Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: 440Jim] #1282859
08/19/12 01:54 PM
08/19/12 01:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline OP
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline OP
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
I'm going to stick w/ the tried-n-true .040" composition gasket on the 452 block since it's been zero decked.

The pistons I ended up getting for the 451 "should" end up .005" down if the original decking was done accurately. In that case I'll have to decide on whether to have the block cut more, or run a .036" MLS on that engine to pull the quench down a bit.

Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: BradH] #1282860
08/19/12 05:23 PM
08/19/12 05:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
P
Performance Only Offline
top fuel
Performance Only  Offline
top fuel
P

Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
Quote:

I'm going to stick w/ the tried-n-true .040" composition gasket on the 452 block since it's been zero decked.

The pistons I ended up getting for the 451 "should" end up .005" down if the original decking was done accurately. In that case I'll have to decide on whether to have the block cut more, or run a .036" MLS on that engine to pull the quench down a bit.




if the compression ratio and camshaft give the desired cylinder pressure, .045 quench is more than adequate. is .005 quench going to make a difference in how the combo runs? not likely IMO if everything else was spec'd out to work together. i can tell you we've done hundreds of big block street combo's using .045 just in case they need a future deck clean up and they all run just fine. most of thise combo's are edelbrock, SR or 440-1 headed combos. most use 93 octane but some can get away with 89 octane. it's all in the cylinder pressure.


machine shop owner and engine builder
Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block... [Re: Performance Only] #1282861
08/19/12 05:34 PM
08/19/12 05:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486
SoCal
Brian Hafliger Offline
master
Brian Hafliger  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486
SoCal
I just did 2 identical small block stroker builds, first one had 10.2:1 and cam was 241@ .050 hyd and second was 10:1 with same cam. Everything else was the exact same from carb to pan...3HP difference and 7Tq. Yes the 10.2:1 engine made slightly more, but you'd never feel it. The first engine will operate at much higher elevationi than the second hence why the bump in compression.

I agree, .040-.045 will be such a small amount of quench and compression...you'll only see it on the dyno chart.


Brian Hafliger






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1