Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block...
[Re: BradH]
#1282849
08/10/12 12:44 PM
08/10/12 12:44 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,213 New York
polyspheric
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,213
New York
|
IIRC Jenkins said that if you don't need more knock suppression tighter clearance increases pumping loss. How much probably varies with the quench surface area and how the edges are prepared.
Boffin Emeritus
|
|
|
Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block...
[Re: BradH]
#1282850
08/10/12 04:18 PM
08/10/12 04:18 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091 Delray beach, Florida
Performance Only
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,091
Delray beach, Florida
|
i don't personally feel there's enough benefit to reduce the quench to .035 vs. .040 thre's most certainly a downside though if the piston starts contacting the head. as the bore and piston wears over time, the piston skirt to wall clearance will increase and hence more piston rock.
machine shop owner and engine builder
|
|
|
Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block...
[Re: 73outlaw]
#1282856
08/11/12 12:27 AM
08/11/12 12:27 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 103
340roadrunner
member
|
member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 103
|
Quote:
Just last week buddy of mine gernaded his 451,guess how??!! I pulled it down and it has .030-.035 piston to head clearance,not good now have a pile iron. Never made a pass down the track. WTF was the builder thinkin????? ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/flame.gif) I would say less than 5hp is in .005 keep her north of .040
wow that really sucks for your buddy! Sounds like hes a dork though... can't he tear down his own engine? Next you'll tell me his cars pink or something.. I agree .035 quench is too little.
|
|
|
Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block...
[Re: BradH]
#1282857
08/11/12 01:25 PM
08/11/12 01:25 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,335 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,335
Bend,OR USA
|
Brad, rock the pistons both ways and shoot for .039 piston to head for pump gas with .002+ rod bearing clearances ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/Twocents.gif) I have never ran rod bearings tighter than .0025 and I have seen witness marks on my piston edges my pump gas street motor with .003+ rod bearing clearances and .039 piston to head clearances cold on the edges ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shock.gif) I switched to a set of .042 Cometics MLS ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbs.gif)
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: .035" Quench for steel-rod big block...
[Re: Performance Only]
#1282861
08/19/12 05:34 PM
08/19/12 05:34 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486 SoCal
Brian Hafliger
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486
SoCal
|
I just did 2 identical small block stroker builds, first one had 10.2:1 and cam was 241@ .050 hyd and second was 10:1 with same cam. Everything else was the exact same from carb to pan...3HP difference and 7Tq. Yes the 10.2:1 engine made slightly more, but you'd never feel it. The first engine will operate at much higher elevationi than the second hence why the bump in compression.
I agree, .040-.045 will be such a small amount of quench and compression...you'll only see it on the dyno chart.
Brian Hafliger
|
|
|
|
|