Re: Lower Control Arm Bushings
[Re: edco440]
#1264120
07/08/12 07:15 PM
07/08/12 07:15 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,316 SoCal
68HemiB
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,316
SoCal
|
One lone vote here for keeping the OE-style rubber LCA bushings. There is very little rubber [and therefore flex] in them. Although usually solvable, the non-rubber style often bring challenges not found when sticking with OE style rubber. Earlier in this thread, you will read as others mention these problems, and the suggested solutions for those problems. If you stick with rubber in the LCA application, you can avoid all of that in the first place. The problem in this other thread might perhaps be from non-standard LCA bushings.
Down to just a blue car now.
|
|
|
Re: Lower Control Arm Bushings
[Re: edco440]
#1264122
07/09/12 09:22 PM
07/09/12 09:22 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,316 SoCal
68HemiB
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,316
SoCal
|
I am well aware that alternate LCA bushings have many proponents.
Despite the PM from another member that this argument is always an exercise in futility, I will respectfully suggest that the O.P. take a quality oe-style LCA bushing in hand, and note the amount of rubber between the two shells and the density of that rubber. Consider for yourself the likelihood of compression of that rubber, the probable degree of that compression, and the movement that might result.
Consider then the frequency of posts asking about the source of the mysterious front-end noise on cars with alternate material in the LCA bushing. Also consider the frequency of posts asking how to correct the movement seen in applications using an alternate LCA bushing.
And then consider the frequency of posts defending alternate LCA bushings, with [often unsolicited] explanations of the additional steps one should take to avoid issues with them.
Alternate materials are great for most other suspension applications.
So ends the lone vote, lost in the wilderness.
Down to just a blue car now.
|
|
|
Re: Lower Control Arm Bushings
[Re: 68HemiB]
#1264123
07/10/12 01:31 AM
07/10/12 01:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347 Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT
Management Trainee
|
Management Trainee
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
|
And I'll waste my time posting a couple pictures the first being a Mopar LCA which as noted by Steve hasn't got allot of rubber in it to deflect... But does have the ability to properly locate the inboard end of the LCA..
"The Armies of our ancestors were lucky, in that they were not trailed by a second army of pencil pushers."
|
|
|
Re: Lower Control Arm Bushings
[Re: 1_WILD_RT]
#1264124
07/10/12 01:32 AM
07/10/12 01:32 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347 Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT
Management Trainee
|
Management Trainee
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
|
And next a set of GM LCA bushings which are worth replacing with something other than rubber.....
"The Armies of our ancestors were lucky, in that they were not trailed by a second army of pencil pushers."
|
|
|
Re: Lower Control Arm Bushings
[Re: ThermoQuad]
#1264126
07/10/12 09:26 AM
07/10/12 09:26 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179 Atco NJ
DJVCuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
|
I've noticed a dfference since swapping to poly - when I did my car 15 years ago i did it all poly, except for the LCA - after 12 years I replaced the front end and guess what the only worn piece was? yup the rubber lca bushings. I have the just suspension lca pivot shafts and they fit great without any slop anyone is referring to.
|
|
|
|
|