Re: what can i expect with this suggested cam upgrade?
[Re: DirectSubjection]
#1218136
04/18/12 09:22 AM
04/18/12 09:22 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,922 n.e. pa.
65rbdodge
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,922
n.e. pa.
|
Quote:
Can you post the actual cam specs?
you mean you don't know the specs off the top of your head?
|
|
|
Re: what can i expect with this suggested cam upgrade?
[Re: 65rbdodge]
#1218137
04/18/12 09:39 AM
04/18/12 09:39 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 559 Idaho
LaRoy Engines
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 559
Idaho
|
From the book.
21-224-4, 1000 to 5200, XE256H, 256/268 adv, 212/218 @ .050", .447/.455
21-672-4, 3000 to 6500, PP292H, 292/299 adv, 247/254 @ .050", .509/.509, 10:1 comp, 3500 stall recommended, the recommended valve springs will require machining the cylinder heads.
Last edited by heyoldguy; 04/18/12 09:45 AM.
|
|
|
Re: what can i expect with this suggested cam upgrade?
[Re: LaRoy Engines]
#1218138
04/18/12 10:24 AM
04/18/12 10:24 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291 Kent, Wa
340SHORTY
Truck Nut
|
Truck Nut
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 12,291
Kent, Wa
|
The 21_224_4 is very close to my MP 268/272 .450/.455 cam Its in my 340 under a 6 pack. It has a nice lope at idle and pulls great.. I built a 350HP 360 for a friend of mine useing that same ca. In the 360 the lope wasnt as noticeable but pulled great in that car also. for his 73 Duster
I am truckless..
|
|
|
Re: what can i expect with this suggested cam upgrade?
[Re: CUDA8U]
#1218140
04/18/12 11:01 AM
04/18/12 11:01 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746 Ontario, Canada
Dodgem
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
|
That will be a nasty cam (I'd like it :-)) Will need to be installed at 102 (101 to 103) to work with a 2800. You will need light advance springs in the Dizzy with timing 38 deg all in by 1200. 5.5 power valve That said it will kick butt. But if you lack cam, carb and distributor tuning skills like most hear you may want to pass and go with something like the hughes whiplash. What is it your really looking for?? What gears you got! and so on
|
|
|
Re: what can i expect with this suggested cam upgrade?
[Re: CUDA8U]
#1218143
04/18/12 02:23 PM
04/18/12 02:23 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
It'd work fine, although the VooDoo 533 might work a little better. The cam has good street manners. Buddy runs on in his 68 RR Similar build 9ish:1 440, e-heads, headers, M1 intake 770 Street Avgr carb, 2800 stall and 3.54 dana. Car runs has run 12.48, usually in the 12.50-55 range.
|
|
|
Re: what can i expect with this suggested cam upgrade?
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#1218148
04/21/12 04:23 PM
04/21/12 04:23 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698 NE Oklahoma
Von
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,698
NE Oklahoma
|
All of you lift/duration guys...why would u want more lift...when stock heads are done (more or less) by .450??? Assuming they are stock heads... As usual on cam posts, I'll go against the grain and say that I have no issues with that cam....It will need more than 2800 flash..3500 at least... With some flash speed it will work with 55s...although not optimal. If you are stuck with the 2800, back the 050 duration down 10 degrees or so.... BTW, dont let them scare you...the cam you listed is VERY streetable, et...with the right carb, vert, etc. I ran the .509 MP cam when I was 19 and couldnt tune a radio...It would idle all day long.. I do wonder if some of the naysayers have ever ACTUALLY ran some of the stuff you knock???? I agree that you should call a cam guy. Porter or Bullet, IMO...skip the others listed. Not saying the others grinds wont work...but Porter is the man...by a long shot. Bullet is decent as well on their Mopar grinds. That ought to get the
72 RR, Pump gas 440, 452s, 3800 lbs, Corked, ET Radials,. 11.33@117.72.
Same car, bone stock 346s, 9.5 comp, baby solid. 12.24@110.
|
|
|
|
|