Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: whomper1]
#1213053
03/19/13 11:08 AM
03/19/13 11:08 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 765 Vancouver, WA
Cuda Cody
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 765
Vancouver, WA
|
You will have to check with Dave as I was not given an exact day they will ship. My guess would be in the next month or so, but I'm fine if they take a bit longer. I'm just glad they are going to make them again and they seem to look pretty good. I like the function of the K&N filters, but I can't stand the look on six pack & hemi cars so these filters will work perfect for me. If someone doesn't like the look of these for whatever reason, there are still NOS filters around and with guys like me buying these instead of NOS it just means there will more for others who have to have NOS. However, if someone wants to sell a NOS for $100, I'd buy it right now, but at $400 for NOS I'll be happy with the new ones. Thank you to whoever took the time to produce these. Quote:
Quote:
I ordered 3 today from Dave. I'm with you.... They'll look good on my cars and I'm glad to have brand new better quality filters.
are they in stock and ready to ship?
i know someone that would buy, but doesnt want to be on a wait list for if or when they will come in stock
1970 Challenger T/A 4-Speed 1970 Challenger T/A 4-Speed 1970 Challenger T/A Auto 1970 Challenger R/T Auto 1970 Challenger Auto 1970 Challenger RT 440+6 4-Speed 1970 Challenger RT 440+6 4-Speed 1970 Hemi Challenger 4-Speed 1970 Hemi Cuda 4-Speed 1971 Cuda Auto 1971 Cuda 4-Speed LOOKING to BUY 1970 & 1971 E Body J, V and R Code project cars
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: Cuda Cody]
#1213054
03/19/13 03:54 PM
03/19/13 03:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,687 New Jersey
Dante
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,687
New Jersey
|
In response to some of the concerns that people have raised about these new repro elements I thought I would share what the manufacturer has released to us about the way the went about manufacturing them.
"The outer screen reinforcement (the one with the holes), we elected to use Stainless steel. This would not allow it to rust in the future, like the original carbon steel reinforcement would over time. The major reason we chose stainless, is because these vehicles (generally) do more sitting than actually being driven. This has become the nature of our sport. We then galvanized the stainless to give it the original appearance of the carbon steel original. The stainless screen does not exhibit the punch out marks that carbon steel does show, because both materials punch differently. Stainless Steel tends to be more brittle and the punch snaps through. While carbon steel pushes and tears before separating. That is the reason for the lack of slight cheese grader effect on the exterior." "The original holes in the outer reinforcement were .280". During Testing, we found that if the holes were increased .030" (to approx. .310") air flow was increased greatly even when filter was partially obstructed with debris or moisture."
I will have these in stock as of Wednesday and we will be shipping all back orders on Thursday.
Dante's Mopar Parts One of the countries largest Interior Dealer, e-mail for a discounted price quote.
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: Dante]
#1213057
03/19/13 06:27 PM
03/19/13 06:27 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134 Kelowna, B.C. Canada
DPelletier
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
|
Quote:
In response to some of the concerns that people have raised about these new repro elements I thought I would share what the manufacturer has released to us about the way the went about manufacturing them.
"The outer screen reinforcement (the one with the holes), we elected to use Stainless steel. This would not allow it to rust in the future, like the original carbon steel reinforcement would over time. The major reason we chose stainless, is because these vehicles (generally) do more sitting than actually being driven. This has become the nature of our sport. We then galvanized the stainless to give it the original appearance of the carbon steel original. The stainless screen does not exhibit the punch out marks that carbon steel does show, because both materials punch differently. Stainless Steel tends to be more brittle and the punch snaps through. While carbon steel pushes and tears before separating. That is the reason for the lack of slight cheese grader effect on the exterior." "The original holes in the outer reinforcement were .280". During Testing, we found that if the holes were increased .030" (to approx. .310") air flow was increased greatly even when filter was partially obstructed with debris or moisture."
I will have these in stock as of Wednesday and we will be shipping all back orders on Thursday.
Dante,
I know you are just passing along what your supplier told you, but because of your good reputation and my own personal positive experiences with you, I would strongly urge you not repeat what they told you. I am a journeyman sheet metal worker, and own a sheet metal fabrication company that is 32 years old and I can tell you that the punch explanation is a load of BS and the coating comment isn't any better.
Dave
1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack
1974 'Cuda
2008 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Ram 3500 Diesel
2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel
2003 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Durango Limited
[url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: Aero426]
#1213058
03/19/13 06:32 PM
03/19/13 06:32 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,343 SE PA.
QuickBpBp
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,343
SE PA.
|
Quote:
It is unfortunate that the new filters have "improvements" that customers did not ask for.
Yep. It's funny that the reasons are because they sit so much so they did this....But then it made a better performing filter if we did this.... I would bet ALL wouldn't know the difference when they drove their car but 100% will know when they open the hood. I am betting it got lost in translation from English to Chinese on how this was supposed to be....
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: DPelletier]
#1213060
03/19/13 06:42 PM
03/19/13 06:42 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134 Kelowna, B.C. Canada
DPelletier
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,134
Kelowna, B.C. Canada
|
Further to the above; - we aren't talking about "the cheese grater effect" which is actually burring on the punched hole, we are talking about the lack of the beveled cone around the hole. Refer to Bill's picture posted previously. - galvanized mild steel takes forever to rust, even when exposed to the elements. Not sure why anyone would use stainless unless they found perforated stainless sheet somewhere with "close enough" hole spacing. - I seriously doubt that stainless sheet was punched and then given a hot dip galvanized coating....which would look incorrect (think boat trailer or anchor). To duplicate the factory look the part would have had to have been formed from galvanized coated sheet and then punched. - the statements that collector cars rarely get driven seems incongruous with the statement that the hole size is increased to give better performance when dirty and/or wet. Anyhow, I'm not trying to bust anyone's chops and I'm glad someone stepped up to make a "more correct" looking alternative to the K&N. It's too bad that they aren't closer to the originals, but that's the way it goes. ...just can't stand the illogical excuses of why that is; just say it was cost effective to make them this way and leave it at that. Dave
1970 Super Bee 440 Six Pack
1974 'Cuda
2008 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Ram 3500 Diesel
2004.5 Ram 2500 Diesel
2003 Ram 3500 Diesel
2006 Durango Limited
[url] http://1970superbee.piczo.com [/url]
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: DPelletier]
#1213061
03/19/13 07:09 PM
03/19/13 07:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,632 jersey shore
flypaper
I hate Texas
|
I hate Texas
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,632
jersey shore
|
then the short story is the profit was more important then the correctness was ! the holes are incorrect due to material cost/availability and the "improvements" are a smokescreen to cover up the reason above... its all about the benji's
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: DPelletier]
#1213062
03/19/13 07:19 PM
03/19/13 07:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,782 N.E. OHIO, USA
A12
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,782
N.E. OHIO, USA
|
I'm going to get at least one for now knowing how picky (re: an@l we Mopar owners are) this crowd is I'm sure the next run will have improvements. Maybe the next batch won't have any changes or maybe the changes are too small to really notice but to me, right now I have three choices where before I only had two before these reproductions came along: Choice 1 (which very few even have at this point) Use an NOS air filter that I got with the A12 on the GTX that I want to add the Air Grabber, (Not going to happen). Choice 2 (the boat that most of us are in at the moment) Pay out the wazoo ($400+) for an NNS last run Fram OEM filter and only use it when you go somewhere that you lift or open the hood. Choice 3 Buy one of these for a buck-fifty and avoid choices 1 and 2, and wait for the competition to improve on this one while DRIVING MY CAR!!!!
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: A12]
#1213064
03/19/13 07:37 PM
03/19/13 07:37 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA
62maxwgn
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436
Blair County,PA
|
Quote:
I'm going to get at least one for now knowing how picky (re: [Email]an@l[/Email] we Mopar owners are) this crowd is I'm sure the next run will have improvements. Maybe the next batch won't have any changes or maybe the changes are too small to really notice but to me, right now I have three choices where before I only had two before these reproductions came along:
Choice 1 (which very few even have at this point) Use an NOS air filter that I got with the A12 on the GTX that I want to add the Air Grabber, (Not going to happen).
Choice 2 (the boat that most of us are in at the moment) Pay out the wazoo ($400+) for an NNS last run Fram OEM filter and only use it when you go somewhere that you lift or open the hood.
Choice 3 Buy one of these for a buck-fifty and avoid choices 1 and 2, and wait for the competition to improve on this one while DRIVING MY CAR!!!!
Mike,what makes you think there will be a second run ?
And,I drive my car with an out of the box Mopar N.O.S.original,if all it does is sit in the garage I don't even need a filter.
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: 62maxwgn]
#1213066
03/19/13 07:47 PM
03/19/13 07:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 765 Vancouver, WA
Cuda Cody
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 765
Vancouver, WA
|
I would not think there would be a 2nd run. Especially if these do not sell well.
1970 Challenger T/A 4-Speed 1970 Challenger T/A 4-Speed 1970 Challenger T/A Auto 1970 Challenger R/T Auto 1970 Challenger Auto 1970 Challenger RT 440+6 4-Speed 1970 Challenger RT 440+6 4-Speed 1970 Hemi Challenger 4-Speed 1970 Hemi Cuda 4-Speed 1971 Cuda Auto 1971 Cuda 4-Speed LOOKING to BUY 1970 & 1971 E Body J, V and R Code project cars
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: Cuda Cody]
#1213067
03/19/13 09:22 PM
03/19/13 09:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,785 Utah and Alaska
astjp2
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,785
Utah and Alaska
|
I will order a few when I have the cash, but I drive mine and I am not a purist...or prude about silly crap. Tim
1941 Taylorcraft 1968 Charger 1994 Wrangler 1998 Wrangler 2008 Kia Rio 2017 Jetta
I didn't do 4 years and 9 months of Graduate School to be called Mister!
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: astjp2]
#1213068
03/19/13 10:42 PM
03/19/13 10:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,782 N.E. OHIO, USA
A12
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,782
N.E. OHIO, USA
|
Quote:
I will order a few when I have the cash, but I drive mine and I am not a purist...or prude about silly crap. Tim
I drive my cars too but I don't have a stash of NOS filters like Bill O...I mean like some that drive with NOS filters.
That's why these latest filters are good enough for me regardless of some holes that aren't just perfect and if there's not going to be another run then all the more reason to buy one of these reproduction air filters, they'll just end up as a good investment. The last run of Fram filters were about $80 and now go look again at the ebag ads they're going for $300-$400+.
I'll get two now that I think about it, and if this is only one run worth, one of you can buy my spare for hmmmmmmmmmm what should I sell it for in a couple of years....seems better than the stock market at this point
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: A12]
#1213069
03/19/13 10:58 PM
03/19/13 10:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030 Wisconsin
Aero426
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,030
Wisconsin
|
Quote:
I'll get two now that I think about it, and if this is only one run worth, one of you can buy my spare for hmmmmmmmmmm what should I sell it for in a couple of years....seems better than the stock market at this point
Probably not a bad gamble.
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: Dante]
#1213071
03/20/13 09:29 AM
03/20/13 09:29 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,576 CT
mrrandyj
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,576
CT
|
Quote:
"The original holes in the outer reinforcement were .280". During Testing, we found that if the holes were increased .030" (to approx. .310") air flow was increased greatly even when filter was partially obstructed with debris or moisture."
I'm sorry, but this is complete bs! They made the holes "approx. . 310" because that is a common size die (5/16" which is actually .312) They took the easy and cheaper way out.
|
|
|
Re: Fram CA 332 V (Just bought one.)
[Re: mrrandyj]
#1213072
03/20/13 09:57 AM
03/20/13 09:57 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,782 N.E. OHIO, USA
A12
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 21,782
N.E. OHIO, USA
|
Quote:
Quote:
"The original holes in the outer reinforcement were .280". During Testing, we found that if the holes were increased .030" (to approx. .310") air flow was increased greatly even when filter was partially obstructed with debris or moisture."
I'm sorry, but this is complete bs! They made the holes "approx. . 310" because that is a common size die (5/16" which is actually .312) They took the easy and cheaper way out.
I getting more and more confused with what is the issue here Someone offers a product that to some can't be found for a reasonable price, some want it to be absolutely perfect that you can't tell it from an original and would or should cost as much as an original or the ebay Fram re-runs price ($400+). If you don't like it move on and go buy one off ebay or I'll sell you my NOS air filter with the bid starting at $1,000.
|
|
|
|
|