Re: Manual Steering box what ratio to get?
[Re: Mattax]
#1199846
03/19/12 11:38 PM
03/19/12 11:38 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302 Nebraska
72Swinger
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,302
Nebraska
|
I got lucky and found a 16:1 Flaming River used for cheap. I think all that FF offers is a 20:1 rebuild. I thought about putting a quickener on a stocker until I found the Flamer box. A 2:1 quickerner would make like a 12:1 box.
Mopar to the bone!!!
|
|
|
Re: Manual Steering box what ratio to get?
[Re: astjp2]
#1199848
03/20/12 08:46 AM
03/20/12 08:46 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,862 the frozen wastes...
Pale_Roader
Swears too much
|
Swears too much
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,862
the frozen wastes...
|
Last i checked there were NO 20:1 or 16:1 kits left anywhere, and Firm Feel has no, and cannot build/rebuild you 16 or 20:1 boxes. ONLY Flaming River offers a fast ratio box, with 16:1. They are pricey, and they are made ov iron, not aluminum... so they'll be heavier. I dont know why the hell FR would choose iron.
If i am wrong, i wish someone would offer some options. I need a 16:1 manual in my E-body, and have resigned myself to spending $500 i dont have on the FR unit, to replace a perfectly good manual box, that is probably half the weight (in a VERY weight-conscious project).
|
|
|
Re: Manual Steering box what ratio to get?
[Re: prrc]
#1199853
03/21/12 01:39 AM
03/21/12 01:39 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645 Phila. Pa.
Mattax
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,645
Phila. Pa.
|
For autocross the 20:1 is too slow. When I mentioned 'slaloms' above I was refering to the part of autocrossing where a 16:1 is most valuable. Once the car is moving, physically turning the wheel is not excessively hard, but does require some upper body and arm strength in an autocross. You definately want to be in decent shape, and if you are driving through the Alps (or similar) for hours on end, a power unit is probably the better choice for most people.
For a tight turn (autocross), I generally reach across the wheel with the inside hand as early and as far as possible. Jr Johnson driving my car kept his hands in position and turned the wheel that way for most of the turns. A few drivers like Jr can get away with this on all but the tightest turns. There are some other more current steering techniques, and you may decide they work for you.
Also if you prefer to be well strapped with a harness, you'll be using different muscles and techniques than if you can lean forward a little and use your back muscles.
Oh yes, if you've added a lot of caster, the steering wheel will snap back to center if you let go of it. Best to keep it under control even though its more work to unwind it.
|
|
|
Re: Manual Steering box what ratio to get?
[Re: Mattax]
#1199857
04/11/12 06:06 PM
04/11/12 06:06 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358 Berwyn, IL
challenger70
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,358
Berwyn, IL
|
Quote:
Parallel parking is definately a bit of work. This is with the original steering wheel (15" dia? bigger?). If you have to turn the steering wheel with the car motionless, its not easy. More work than the standard 24:1 I can't honestly say. I'd have to swap on stock wheels and tires to make an honest comparison. I think so though.
Once the car is moving I don't find the 16:1 any real work at all. Before installing the 16:1, I had 20:1 in my rebult /6 box. Biggest advantage to the 16:1 is during slaloms. If you're not doing slaloms then 20:1 might be a compromise.
I have the flaming river 16:1 setup and parking can be a bit rough but no too bad. Once your moving it's fine and it's worth it to get rid of the power steering stuff in the engine bay...
|
|
|
|
|