Re: 440 vs 440 magnum
[Re: B5 Bee]
#1158069
01/15/12 07:16 PM
01/15/12 07:16 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,321 A gulag near you.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,321
A gulag near you.
|
Quote:
Magnum, Super Commando, TNT, will have; higher compression cam with more duration and lift windage tray baffled oil pan free flow exhaust manifolds larger carb different ignition curve motors in front of manual trans had dual points
depending on year, it could also have; larger exhaust valves higher capacity oil pan
Higher compression will also depend on the year , 66-70 the 350HP and 375HP motors had the same advertised compression ratio.
|
|
|
Re: 440 vs 440 magnum
[Re: B5 Bee]
#1158070
01/15/12 07:18 PM
01/15/12 07:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,922 n.e. pa.
65rbdodge
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,922
n.e. pa.
|
Quote:
Magnum, Super Commando, TNT, will have; higher compression cam with more duration and lift windage tray baffled oil pan free flow exhaust manifolds larger carb different ignition curve motors in front of manual trans had dual points
depending on year, it could also have; larger exhaust valves higher capacity oil pan
+valve springs
|
|
|
Re: 440 vs 440 magnum
[Re: DaytonaTurbo]
#1158072
01/17/12 02:32 PM
01/17/12 02:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
dogdays
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
|
UHHHHH, I don't think so. HP pistons should have a taller compression distance to raise compression, at least til '73 or so. Also the 908 "6-pack" rods were in the HP motors for a while. R.
Last edited by dogdays; 01/17/12 02:33 PM.
|
|
|
|
|