Re: E body rear spring hangers
[Re: Ron TN]
#1110226
11/10/11 01:28 PM
11/10/11 01:28 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,394 Pikes Peak Country
TC@HP2
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,394
Pikes Peak Country
|
Noise, vibration, and harshness tend to be somewhat subjective in measure and are typically tough to make compatible with precise handling on our old heaps. To me, rubber is very mushy and poly bushings are very comfortable, but I've driven competition cars that used nylon or bronze bushings that produce a harshness that most people wouldn't tolerate.
Things that contribute to NVH are poly bushings, high spring rates, high pressure shocks, or stiff and/or short sidewall tires. Since you have relatively soft rates (assumption since you said standard rear springs and I don't know what t-bars, but again, assuming stock) and Monroes tend to be somewhat conservative in pressure (even their HD units), I could only suggest that the poly is what's contributing to the harshness. Even though you have a 50 series tire, most of these are S or T rated which means they tend to be somewhat softer in ride. Certainly more so than a 35 or 40 series, but not nearly as much as a 60 series. Also, 295 on an 8" rim is really pulling the tire in a fair amount. If your running these at 35 psi, I'd be willing to bet you aren't putting all the tread face down on the ground and the pressure is pumping up the sidewall a fair amount, so that will also contribute to NVH. Dropping pressure down to 28 will improve the footprint while reducing harshness.
Can you still get decent handling by using rubber, sure, it will give up some performance when pushing the envelope and running the ragged edge, but if you're primarily cruising, it will be more than sufficient.
|
|
|
|
|