Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
1976 440 build need some advice. #1079342
09/20/11 03:33 PM
09/20/11 03:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
0791challenger Offline OP
super stock
0791challenger  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
I am helping a friend do a ground up on a 77 PW he has a 76 440 we are building. We dont want anything out of this world just raise the compression and he wants a nice thump from the cam.

So I am saking you guys what pistons and cam to use? he is using 452 heads with a lil wrk done to them, 440 source 1.5 roller rockers, holley 750(we know we will probly need a bigger carb)intake is undecided but will be dual plane and a 4 speed.

We are looking at the KB 236 pistons, what is anyones experience with them? Thanks for any input.

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: 0791challenger] #1079343
09/20/11 04:41 PM
09/20/11 04:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,015
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,015
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

I am helping a friend do a ground up on a 77 PW he has a 76 440 we are building. We dont want anything out of this world just raise the compression and he wants a nice thump from the cam.

So I am saking you guys what pistons and cam to use? he is using 452 heads with a lil wrk done to them, 440 source 1.5 roller rockers, holley 750(we know we will probly need a bigger carb)intake is undecided but will be dual plane and a 4 speed.

We are looking at the KB 236 pistons, what is anyones experience with them? Thanks for any input.




Did you just wake up Mr. van Winkle ?

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: 0791challenger] #1079344
09/20/11 04:43 PM
09/20/11 04:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
The stock compression ratio will have been measured at around 7.4:1, no matter what the books say. The key thing here is he's using stock heads. If using a closed chamber head your pistons will vary.

I worked with a friend several years ago to build his '76 W250's 440. On my suggestion he went to KB 184 pistons which have a "quench dome" that requires machining to fit. That way the machinist can make sure the squish distance is about 0.040". With some careful measuring and machining, including IIRC milling some off the non-dome top side of the pistons, he ended up with 0.040" squish and 9.5:1 measured compression.

The camshaft was a Hughes with 216 degrees intake and I believe 224 exhaust on a 112 LSA. Intake and carb were stock. He used Hedman Elite headers. Distributor was either stock or MP electronic HP, I don't remember.

I was secretly a little worried about that compression in an iron-headed motor with a rather short intake lobe. I was really relieved when he reported the engine ran like a bear and didn't ping on midgrade (87 octane @ 5900 ft elevation) while doubling the previous gas mileage.

He thanked me later for the tech support and said it had exceeded his wildest expectations and the extra $$ he'd had to put into machining was well worth it. The rebuild turned the truck into something he could afford to drive regularly.

Nothing beats squish and compression for getting results!

R.

PS: If at all possible, a set of long-tube headers will fatten up the torque curve below the torque peak and help drivability, power and economy.

PPS: No need to spend more $ on a larger carb, that 750 is good for 450 hp at least, and that's your top until he gets more flow out of the heads. For a 2-plane intake the only decent choice is the Edelbrock Performer RPM. Everything else is in second place.

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: JohnRR] #1079345
09/20/11 04:49 PM
09/20/11 04:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
0791challenger Offline OP
super stock
0791challenger  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
Quote:

Quote:

I am helping a friend do a ground up on a 77 PW he has a 76 440 we are building. We dont want anything out of this world just raise the compression and he wants a nice thump from the cam.

So I am saking you guys what pistons and cam to use? he is using 452 heads with a lil wrk done to them, 440 source 1.5 roller rockers, holley 750(we know we will probly need a bigger carb)intake is undecided but will be dual plane and a 4 speed.

We are looking at the KB 236 pistons, what is anyones experience with them? Thanks for any input.




Did you just wake up Mr. van Winkle ?



Enlighten me John???

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: dogdays] #1079346
09/20/11 04:52 PM
09/20/11 04:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
0791challenger Offline OP
super stock
0791challenger  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
Quote:

The stock compression ratio will have been measured at around 7.4:1, no matter what the books say. The key thing here is he's using stock heads. If using a closed chamber head your pistons will vary.

I worked with a friend several years ago to build his '76 W250's 440. On my suggestion he went to KB 184 pistons which have a "quench dome" that requires machining to fit. That way the machinist can make sure the squish distance is about 0.040". With some careful measuring and machining, including IIRC milling some off the non-dome top side of the pistons, he ended up with 0.040" squish and 9.5:1 measured compression.

The camshaft was a Hughes with 216 degrees intake and I believe 224 exhaust on a 112 LSA. Intake and carb were stock. He used Hedman Elite headers. Distributor was either stock or MP electronic HP, I don't remember.

I was secretly a little worried about that compression in an iron-headed motor with a rather short intake lobe. I was really relieved when he reported the engine ran like a bear and didn't ping on midgrade (87 octane @ 5900 ft elevation) while doubling the previous gas mileage.

He thanked me later for the tech support and said it had exceeded his wildest expectations and the extra $$ he'd had to put into machining was well worth it. The rebuild turned the truck into something he could afford to drive regularly.

Nothing beats squish and compression for getting results!

R.

PS: If at all possible, a set of long-tube headers will fatten up the torque curve below the torque peak and help drivability, power and economy.

PPS: No need to spend more $ on a larger carb, that 750 is good for 450 hp at least, and that's your top until he gets more flow out of the heads. For a 2-plane intake the only decent choice is the Edelbrock Performer RPM. Everything else is in second place.




Thanks for the info, helps alot!

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: 0791challenger] #1079347
09/20/11 10:50 PM
09/20/11 10:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
3
383man Offline
Too Many Posts
383man  Offline
Too Many Posts
3

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I am helping a friend do a ground up on a 77 PW he has a 76 440 we are building. We dont want anything out of this world just raise the compression and he wants a nice thump from the cam.

So I am saking you guys what pistons and cam to use? he is using 452 heads with a lil wrk done to them, 440 source 1.5 roller rockers, holley 750(we know we will probly need a bigger carb)intake is undecided but will be dual plane and a 4 speed.

We are looking at the KB 236 pistons, what is anyones experience with them? Thanks for any input.




Did you just wake up Mr. van Winkle ?



Enlighten me John???





The highlighted 440source rockers. I have heard they can be problems. I will say I like the Hughes roller rockers I use. Ron

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: 383man] #1079348
09/21/11 07:34 AM
09/21/11 07:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,392
nielsville, minn.
Q
quickd100 Offline
master
quickd100  Offline
master
Q

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,392
nielsville, minn.
With the quench dome pistons and 9.5-1 compression I'd use the MP .528 mechanical cam. It's a torque monster, has a nice thump at idle, and it will work with your exhaust manifolds if you decide to keep them. A good street dominator intake and a 750 carb to top it all off. Dave

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: quickd100] #1079349
09/21/11 08:11 AM
09/21/11 08:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
stock vavle train will be fine for what he wants. Not sure on the slugs, maybe see if he can find an old set of TRW "six-pack" pistons. As for cam he has plenty to choose from, just read the advertised specs and decide what will work best for his application. The 750 will be fine as well.
Good luck.


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: Mr.Yuck] #1079350
09/21/11 11:51 AM
09/21/11 11:51 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
NONONO! Don't even think about building a no-squish engine. No flat tops allowed!
Sure, thay can be made to work. But a good squish engine will beat a good non-squish engine every time. It's a fact. Quicker combustion allows more compression on the same fuel octane plus less time spent building cylinder pressure ahead of TDC. More compression means a more efficient engine. And what does the cylinder pressure BTDC do? tries to push the piston backwards down the cylinder.

It's called negative work.

The fewer degrees of spark advance the engine needs to make max power, the better. Bigblocks used to need 38 degrees. Modern chambers are doing it at 30. Using a "quench dome" piston will help move the awful B/RB combustion chambers into the present.

R.

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: dogdays] #1079351
09/21/11 12:35 PM
09/21/11 12:35 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Tell your friend to skip the adjustable valvetrain and stick with stock rockers/pushrods. You can run a pretty decent hydraulic cam with the stock valvetrain.

Also while the KB236 pistons are a great choice for 440 build with closed chambered heads setup for quench, they aren't a good choice for use with 452 heads. With 452's they will give you about 9.8 compression which will be too much for an iron headed, mild cammed pump gas non-quench engine. I would either go with a lower CR piston to drop down to around 9:1 compression or do like dogdays suggests and do a domed quench piston, however they do require more work to setup properly.

Remember, the stock 68-71 440's ran a piston further in the hole to give them around 8.8 compression. And IMO in a truck you don't want it setup right on the ragged edge of detonation.

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #1079352
09/21/11 06:38 PM
09/21/11 06:38 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 863
Pinelands , NJ
J
joelson6 Offline
super stock
joelson6  Offline
super stock
J

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 863
Pinelands , NJ
my experience is that if you go any higher than stock with the cam, you'll be throwing pushrods.

over .460 lift on the cam, get adj. rockers or pushrods. worth the money spent.

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: joelson6] #1079353
09/21/11 07:48 PM
09/21/11 07:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Never thrown a pushrod with my lunati cam 513/533 lift shifting at 5800.

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: 0791challenger] #1079354
09/21/11 11:38 PM
09/21/11 11:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
0791challenger Offline OP
super stock
0791challenger  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
What do you guys think about this piston? Seems to have the same specs as the KB184 but is cheaper when u buy the whole rebuild kit.

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: joelson6] #1079355
09/22/11 07:01 AM
09/22/11 07:01 AM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 297
Oklahoma
T
TinCuda Offline
enthusiast
TinCuda  Offline
enthusiast
T

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 297
Oklahoma
Quote:

my experience is that if you go any higher than stock with the cam, you'll be throwing pushrods.

over .460 lift on the cam, get adj. rockers or pushrods. worth the money spent.




The stock six pack cam has .464 lift. Heck the mopar performance upgrade 2 has .509 lift. Sorry if you have had bad luck in the past but I just don't see it as a problem.


.,


(O O {]{]{]||[}[}[} O O) 1971 Plymouth 'Cuda 440-6 {||O||} 2000 Yamaha V-Max (O O [========= SRT] O O) 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT 392 . Making as big as a carbon footprint as I can!!!
Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: 0791challenger] #1079356
09/22/11 10:39 AM
09/22/11 10:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
0791challenger Offline OP
super stock
0791challenger  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
Quote:

What do you guys think about this piston? Seems to have the same specs as the KB184 but is cheaper when u buy the whole rebuild kit.




I copied but never pasted lol
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SLP-L2295F30/

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: 0791challenger] #1079357
09/22/11 12:53 PM
09/22/11 12:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
If you want to build a flat top open chamber no squish motor I guess you'll do it, and pay the price in detonation. But there is both performance and mileage to be had by doing what I described in my first post.

As far as I know there isn't a single open chamber engine being put in new cars sold in the USA at present. Since horsepower numbers keep going up and the car companies would kill their mothers for an extra 0.1 mpg for the fleet, that says something. The open chamber Mopar head design was a lazy approach to the smog control program starting in 1968. They could vary compression easily by changing the compression height of the piston. No close tolerances to maintain.

I don't know how much the pistons cost in a kit, but by themselves they are both heavy and expensive. $448 for a set will get you really close to some nice lighter forgings or past the KB184s I mentioned earlier.

R.

Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: 0791challenger] #1079358
09/22/11 08:14 PM
09/22/11 08:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,314
Prospect, PA
BSB67 Offline
master
BSB67  Offline
master

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,314
Prospect, PA
The 2295 is not a reverse dome. This is an old style higher compression domed piston. i don't think its for you.

Quench is always good to have as it is better than not, but depending on your budget, you can certainly build a non-quench motor and it will be fine. You'll need to knock the CR down a bit and your cam choice needs to be part of the final CR choice.

Last edited by BSB67; 09/22/11 08:16 PM.
Re: 1976 440 build need some advice. [Re: dogdays] #1079359
09/22/11 09:29 PM
09/22/11 09:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
0791challenger Offline OP
super stock
0791challenger  Offline OP
super stock

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Henderson Kentucky
Quote:

If you want to build a flat top open chamber no squish motor I guess you'll do it, and pay the price in detonation. But there is both performance and mileage to be had by doing what I described in my first post.

As far as I know there isn't a single open chamber engine being put in new cars sold in the USA at present. Since horsepower numbers keep going up and the car companies would kill their mothers for an extra 0.1 mpg for the fleet, that says something. The open chamber Mopar head design was a lazy approach to the smog control program starting in 1968. They could vary compression easily by changing the compression height of the piston. No close tolerances to maintain.

I don't know how much the pistons cost in a kit, but by themselves they are both heavy and expensive. $448 for a set will get you really close to some nice lighter forgings or past the KB184s I mentioned earlier.

R.




I take it by you guys response's that the speed pro is not the correct style piston lol. We will be using the KB 184 like dogdays suggested. I was just looking at all angles cause I am spending someone else's money. Thats for all the very helpful info guys!

Josh







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1