Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Shimming the K-member #1059328
08/22/11 11:26 AM
08/22/11 11:26 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 591
Champion City
The Sphinx Offline OP
mopar
The Sphinx  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 591
Champion City
Anybody ever put shims between the frame rails and the K-member to gain any under hood clearance? I just want to know what issues were involved, I'd like to drop mine 1/2" to gain space between my bell housing and firewall.

Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: The Sphinx] #1059329
08/22/11 11:39 AM
08/22/11 11:39 AM
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
CompSyn Offline
pro stock
CompSyn  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,285
Pacific NW USA
You'd have to drop the torsion bar frame mounts the same length as well. Also, the steering column and radiator to fan shroud would be out of wack too. It'd be a can of worms not worth opening.

Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: The Sphinx] #1059330
08/22/11 12:05 PM
08/22/11 12:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,978
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

Anybody ever put shims between the frame rails and the K-member to gain any under hood clearance? I just want to know what issues were involved, I'd like to drop mine 1/2" to gain space between my bell housing and firewall.




The 68 Hemi super stock A bodies used K frame spacers , I know they didn't do anything to the Torsion bar Xmember , but if you need clearance between the bellhousing and firewall how about applying a little

Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: The Sphinx] #1059331
08/22/11 02:10 PM
08/22/11 02:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 799
Missouri
B
bb74swngr Offline
mopar addict
bb74swngr  Offline
mopar addict
B

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 799
Missouri
I have a 440 in my Dart with the Schumacher motor mounts. When I put the NOS plates on I needed a 1/4" more hood clearance. I put the 1/2" spacers between the frame and k-member with no problems at this point. No issues with TB's, exhaust, steering, fuel, throttle cable, trans cable, cruise cable, wiring, hoses, or anything else. My only concern was the fan shroud clearance and it turned out I had plenty. Check out the pic of the spacers I made. I countersank one side of the holes in case they came in contact with the bolt. I loosened all four bolts, took them out of one side only, pried the k-member down slightly, slid in the spacers, replaced the bolts but not completely tight. I then installed the other side the same way. Torqued all the bolts and good to go. Hope I didn't forget anything:)

6789737-IMGP0189.JPG (610 downloads)

BigBlock 74 Swinger
Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: The Sphinx] #1059332
08/22/11 03:49 PM
08/22/11 03:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277
West Coast, USA
jbc426 Offline
master
jbc426  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,277
West Coast, USA
What causing the engine & trans to sit up so high?
I had a similar issue, but not quite so much. It turned out to be a bad set of Dynatech aftermarket interlocking motor mounts. They were warrantied and the replacements fit right and dropped the motor down to the stock position.


If you do shim the K-frame, be sure to check your driveline & pinon angle in relation to the crank/trans centerline.

Last edited by jbc426; 08/22/11 03:53 PM.

1970 Plymouth 'Cuda #'s 440-6(block in storage)currently 493" 6 pack, Shaker, 5 speed Passon, 4.10's
1968 Plymouth Barracuda Convertible 408 Magnum EFI with 4 speed automatic overdrive, 3800 stall lock-up converter and 4.30's (closest thing to an automatic 5 speed going)
Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: jbc426] #1059333
08/22/11 07:35 PM
08/22/11 07:35 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 815
PNW
D
Danan Offline
super stock
Danan  Offline
super stock
D

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 815
PNW
Those Schumacher mounts are very handy, but they don't put the engine in the stock location...exactly. I used a set of hemi conversion mounts in a challenger and the air cleaner just clears the hood (like, by a millimeter). I never got around to shimming the K member, but at some point you have to do what you have to do. Also, at some point you will really start screwing with the geometry of the front end. The 68 SS cars used special components (lower ball joints, etc) to correct the geometry. Those parts, so far as I can tell, are not available for a 68 SS car let alone a B/E body.

Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: Danan] #1059334
08/22/11 10:32 PM
08/22/11 10:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Shimming the K member up is a bad idea. The self centering feature of the bolts is lost too. This "fix" is like buying a hat that is too small, then going to get your head shrunk to fit the hat.

Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: Kern Dog] #1059335
08/23/11 01:33 AM
08/23/11 01:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
Jim_Lusk Offline
I Live Here
Jim_Lusk  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
Quote:

Shimming the K member up is a bad idea. The self centering feature of the bolts is lost too. This "fix" is like buying a hat that is too small, then going to get your head shrunk to fit the hat.




The self-centering feature does NOT change....Think about it.....I would want longer bolts, though.

Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: Jim_Lusk] #1059336
08/23/11 11:34 AM
08/23/11 11:34 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 799
Missouri
B
bb74swngr Offline
mopar addict
bb74swngr  Offline
mopar addict
B

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 799
Missouri
Quote:

Quote:

Shimming the K member up is a bad idea. The self centering feature of the bolts is lost too. This "fix" is like buying a hat that is too small, then going to get your head shrunk to fit the hat.




The self-centering feature does NOT change....Think about it.....I would want longer bolts, though.




Jim is right, the bolt still fits the spacer with the countersink and centers as engineered. My bolts were long enough. In the telephone industry it was a requirement to have the length of the diameter extend through the nut for strength. Mine exceeded this length.

BTW this gave me more room between the trans and firewall and more room between the brake booster and the valve cover...very cool:)

Russ


BigBlock 74 Swinger
Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: bb74swngr] #1059337
08/23/11 09:47 PM
08/23/11 09:47 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,916
new berlin wisconsin
M
Mr T2U Offline
master
Mr T2U  Offline
master
M

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,916
new berlin wisconsin
m i have driven my 72 road runner, was 624 now 572 hemi with shumacher conversion mounts 50,000+ miles with 1/4" shims between the k member and the frame rails without significant problems. i have moog offset A arm bushings to get 3* positive caster, and i corrected the driveshaft angles before i drove it anywhere. the torsion bars slide in and out of there mounts without problems.
the only problem i have is a mild bump steer on large bumps at speed, like potholes. i mostly drive highway miles, was daily driver for 8 years. if you plan on cornering you probably won't want shims.


perception is 90% of reality
Re: Shimming the K-member [Re: bb74swngr] #1059338
08/23/11 09:50 PM
08/23/11 09:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,036
Benton, IL.
D
DaveRS23 Offline
Special needs idiot
DaveRS23  Offline
Special needs idiot
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,036
Benton, IL.
Check the archives, this has been discussed here several times. And there are people that have never done it and say it is a bad idea.

But then there are a good number of us that have done it and had no insurmountable problems. On my current car, I had to let the steering column drop with the K, and had to shorten the tranny mount to keep the front joint from binding.

I have done this several times on several different cars. Each time there has been something or other that needed attention, but overall, no big deal.

Why not just try it? If issues come up that you cannot fix, just take the spacers back out.


Master, again and still






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1