Re: HP for $$$
[Re: 1967dartgt]
#1037624
07/27/11 09:43 PM
07/27/11 09:43 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
OP
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
OP
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
Quote:
hey mryuck have you seen that stock 440 cast piston motor the supercharger store built, : wait bolted on. i think it made like 800 horsepower see you do not have to be a rocket scientist to build a big block just a socket set
Would love to see those cast piston after a few races oh wait I would only have to look at the track to see them laying there. And how much was the blower set up fromthem. I priced a f1 from them complete with out intercooler was 5500.00 not cheap!
Not so much a piston problem as fuel...get the fuel in you can use carboard pistons. Problem w/ "mopar" kits is they COST TOO MUCH...make you own and you can save thousands.
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#1037627
07/27/11 09:47 PM
07/27/11 09:47 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
Great for you guys have fun in the junk yard and keep thinking boost and cast pistons get along. But at 250 a motor it would that like 10 motors to equal any real money. So stock up on those cast piston motors.
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: d-150]
#1037630
07/27/11 09:59 PM
07/27/11 09:59 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978 Hilltown Pa
1967dartgt
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,978
Hilltown Pa
|
Yup you keep believin that!! HAHA
Brett Miller W9 cnc'd heads STR Chassis fabraction
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: Mopar-Al]
#1037632
07/27/11 10:47 PM
07/27/11 10:47 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,593 Great Neck,LI,new york
hemi-itis
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 12,593
Great Neck,LI,new york
|
Quote:
darn, I bought these engines and 1 more for 2k with all the parts to put them back together. A race shop in New Orleans was shutting down. Bargain deals are out there. But blowers don't count. The 392 is .030 over with jahns pistons, big cam and 6 carbs. It was a rather cheap build
If you got all that in the picture for $2k,you either {1} Had a very large handgin,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,or {2} Bought it 20 years ago
Nice score!!!
HEMI-ITIS has no cure. My condition is fully BLOWN!!
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#1037633
07/27/11 11:17 PM
07/27/11 11:17 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415 Peru
cbarracuda
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 415
Peru
|
Quote:
Nope, but there was a member that had a 61-62 dart w/ a junk yard cast crank/piston 440 w/ a 671 that ran high 10's with nothing fancy...
WOW 440 with a 671 blower that ran high 10's! Now I understand why some of you like big blocks only
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: hemi-itis]
#1037634
07/27/11 11:39 PM
07/27/11 11:39 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780 Alabama
Mopar-Al
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,780
Alabama
|
Quote:
Quote:
darn, I bought these engines and 1 more for 2k with all the parts to put them back together. A race shop in New Orleans was shutting down. Bargain deals are out there. But blowers don't count. The 392 is .030 over with jahns pistons, big cam and 6 carbs. It was a rather cheap build
If you got all that in the picture for $2k,you either {1} Had a very large handgin,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,or {2} Bought it 20 years ago
Nice score!!!
Yeah it's been a while, you aught to see the rest of the storage for parts. I go broke buying deals up. I bought a b body 8 3/4 rearend with 391's in it day before yesterday for 70 bucks. There's gold out in these hills Found an R5 p7 roller cam, dry sump, gear drive, intake, to pan for 5k yesterday. Short block was assembled to
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: cbarracuda]
#1037635
07/28/11 07:15 AM
07/28/11 07:15 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
OP
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
OP
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
Quote:
Nope, but there was a member that had a 61-62 dart w/ a junk yard cast crank/piston 440 w/ a 671 that ran high 10's with nothing fancy...
WOW 440 with a 671 blower that ran high 10's! Now I understand why some of you like big blocks only
ummm why don't you go do the same to a low compression 360 and stick it in a HUGE car (those darts were big) and get back with me on that. I'll even let you use your king kong 340 if ya like. My guess is you be in the 12's .
You guys with your s/b's are missing the point. What ever you do to a S/B I can do to a BB and it will be faster PERIOD. I will get my 500HP much easier and cheaper than you will. I can get my 500 using iron heads stock crank, rods, hydro cam, stock shafts and rockers and you can't.
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#1037636
07/28/11 07:36 AM
07/28/11 07:36 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179 Atco NJ
DJVCuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
|
Quote:
I can get my 500 using iron heads stock crank, rods, hydro cam, stock shafts and rockers and you can't.
I'd like to see this - 500 at the crank with all stock parts
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: DJVCuda]
#1037637
07/28/11 08:37 AM
07/28/11 08:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
OP
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
OP
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
Quote:
I can get my 500 using iron heads stock crank, rods, hydro cam, stock shafts and rockers and you can't.
I'd like to see this - 500 at the crank with all stock parts
why's that? You can get it with old school TRW 10.5:1 pistons, LY rods, stock crank, home ported 915 or 906 heads, 1 7/8" headers, RPM intake and a 509 cam. Think not? Here's a freinds old set up in a full steel 67 GTX. As mention above stock carnk 440 w/ TRW's ported 915 heads, 1 7/8 headers, 509 cam, Stock shafts/rockers and a six-pack. Not sure what stall but he had 4.10's and ran 11.80 @ 116. That's about 465 at the rear wheels. I'll bet that's over 500 at the crank. Could be equaled w/ a single 4. I have another friend that ran the same thing except a 557 solid in a 70 4 speed RR, he had about the same #'s w/ more mph but I'm guessing the RR is a little heavier. Nothing fancy about either set-up.
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#1037639
07/29/11 01:29 AM
07/29/11 01:29 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275 Desert Tracker
HYPER8oSoNic
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I can get my 500 using iron heads stock crank, rods, hydro cam, stock shafts and rockers and you can't.
I'd like to see this - 500 at the crank with all stock parts
why's that? You can get it with old school TRW 10.5:1 pistons, LY rods, stock crank, home ported 915 or 906 heads, 1 7/8" headers, RPM intake and a 509 cam. Think not? Here's a freinds old set up in a full steel 67 GTX. As mention above stock carnk 440 w/ TRW's ported 915 heads, 1 7/8 headers, 509 cam, Stock shafts/rockers and a six-pack. Not sure what stall but he had 4.10's and ran 11.80 @ 116. That's about 465 at the rear wheels. I'll bet that's over 500 at the crank. Could be equaled w/ a single 4. I have another friend that ran the same thing except a 557 solid in a 70 4 speed RR, he had about the same #'s w/ more mph but I'm guessing the RR is a little heavier. Nothing fancy about either set-up.
The average et/mph for the B-Body 440 combo is around the 11.80-11.30 range. Anything else, stroked 440 or not, is a bonus. Smallblocks, built right can reach the 11.40-11'teens range, stock stroke, (it's been proven) so I would be wary of the races picked. The "true" costs of build where it consists of money spent where it's needed, will determine the cheapest build. And for the sake of advancing technology, it isn't always the Big Block.
"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids" "Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: HYPER8oSoNic]
#1037640
07/29/11 08:50 AM
07/29/11 08:50 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562 Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck
OP
Not enough dumb comments...yet
|
OP
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I can get my 500 using iron heads stock crank, rods, hydro cam, stock shafts and rockers and you can't.
I'd like to see this - 500 at the crank with all stock parts
why's that? You can get it with old school TRW 10.5:1 pistons, LY rods, stock crank, home ported 915 or 906 heads, 1 7/8" headers, RPM intake and a 509 cam. Think not? Here's a freinds old set up in a full steel 67 GTX. As mention above stock carnk 440 w/ TRW's ported 915 heads, 1 7/8 headers, 509 cam, Stock shafts/rockers and a six-pack. Not sure what stall but he had 4.10's and ran 11.80 @ 116. That's about 465 at the rear wheels. I'll bet that's over 500 at the crank. Could be equaled w/ a single 4. I have another friend that ran the same thing except a 557 solid in a 70 4 speed RR, he had about the same #'s w/ more mph but I'm guessing the RR is a little heavier. Nothing fancy about either set-up.
The average et/mph for the B-Body 440 combo is around the 11.80-11.30 range. Anything else, stroked 440 or not, is a bonus. Smallblocks, built right can reach the 11.40-11'teens range, stock stroke, (it's been proven) so I would be wary of the races picked. The "true" costs of build where it consists of money spent where it's needed, will determine the cheapest build. And for the sake of advancing technology, it isn't always the Big Block.
not a chance you can take a stock stroke 340 and use an old school 509, home port job, stock valve train, headers and all drop it in a b-body and run close to 11's. I'd bet it would run in the 13's (if that) They same combo I wrote about above would run 10's easy in an A-body w/o a huge amount of stall or steap gears. Nobody is saying you can make a sb run...
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#1037641
07/29/11 07:22 PM
07/29/11 07:22 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275 Desert Tracker
HYPER8oSoNic
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,275
Desert Tracker
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I can get my 500 using iron heads stock crank, rods, hydro cam, stock shafts and rockers and you can't.
I'd like to see this - 500 at the crank with all stock parts
why's that? You can get it with old school TRW 10.5:1 pistons, LY rods, stock crank, home ported 915 or 906 heads, 1 7/8" headers, RPM intake and a 509 cam. Think not? Here's a freinds old set up in a full steel 67 GTX. As mention above stock carnk 440 w/ TRW's ported 915 heads, 1 7/8 headers, 509 cam, Stock shafts/rockers and a six-pack. Not sure what stall but he had 4.10's and ran 11.80 @ 116. That's about 465 at the rear wheels. I'll bet that's over 500 at the crank. Could be equaled w/ a single 4. I have another friend that ran the same thing except a 557 solid in a 70 4 speed RR, he had about the same #'s w/ more mph but I'm guessing the RR is a little heavier. Nothing fancy about either set-up.
The average et/mph for the B-Body 440 combo is around the 11.80-11.30 range. Anything else, stroked 440 or not, is a bonus. Smallblocks, built right can reach the 11.40-11'teens range, stock stroke, (it's been proven) so I would be wary of the races picked. The "true" costs of build where it consists of money spent where it's needed, will determine the cheapest build. And for the sake of advancing technology, it isn't always the Big Block.
not a chance you can take a stock stroke 340 and use an old school 509, home port job, stock valve train, headers and all drop it in a b-body and run close to 11's. I'd bet it would run in the 13's (if that) They same combo I wrote about above would run 10's easy in an A-body w/o a huge amount of stall or steap gears. Nobody is saying you can make a sb run...
No..You are just against the idea of one (smallblock) in a B-Body, RUNNING HARD!! Let me ask one question... Is everything that you COMPARE have to be in a B-Body chassis? I do understand and respect your combo - a classic example of what to do in a HEAVY chassis. The et's listed above were for their RESPECTIVE chassis (ie: 440 B-Body, 340/360 A-body). Most racers who run street/strip or all out track DO lighten up B-Bodies. It's been an ongoing Mopar tradition since the time of the Max-Wedge and Race HEMI era. Saves parts, less breakage and reduces the hp absorbed (in chassis) to move the vehicle. Granted the sky is the limit for displacement and with that in saying, you COULD put a two-door C body into the high to mid 11's with a correctly built 540+ (stroker) wedge and some weight lost in the RIGHT places. But thats just ONE of a few odd examples. Smallblocks CAN power a 3500 lb B-body (stripper model/w driver) to the 12-12.5 sec zone, with nary a problem. It's the SAME weight as an average A-body, but a WIDER chassis (mass) to move! But, it's not as efficient compared to the Big Block. As CompSync put it, it's all about careful choice of parts and CORRECT assembly. There are LOTS of people who are talented at extracting power from a stock stroke 340, since it's rise from the street scene in 68'-69' to the battle zones of the Modified Production classes till late 70's. There's still ONGOING performance development on the 340 motor, so just as you respect your 440's, 340's command THEIR OWN respect BIG TIME!!
"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids" "Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)
|
|
|
Re: HP for $$$
[Re: MR_P_BODY]
#1037643
07/29/11 08:03 PM
07/29/11 08:03 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
Quote:
not a chance you can take a stock stroke 340 and use an old school 509, home port job, stock valve train, headers and all drop it in a b-body and run close to 11's. I'd bet it would run in the 13's (if that) They same combo I wrote about above would run 10's easy in an A-body w/o a huge amount of stall or steap gears. Nobody is saying you can make a sb run...
Not that I want to get into your peeing match but I have to say... IF you take your B-body and he takes his A-body and BOTH weigh the same 3500# the A-body will be quicker because it has a shorter wheel base and is more apt to transfer weight easier and better... carry on
what is the wheelbase on a b body? my driveshaft from the challenger slid right into my cuda but the rear was moved back some in the cuda
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
|
|