Re: Six pack manifold testing
[Re: moderncylinder]
#1028516
07/09/11 09:24 AM
07/09/11 09:24 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
Quote:
runners look too long and plenums too small
Jeff, can you explain why you say that please? i have noticed over the years that the plenums on the SS hemi motors have gotten smaller.
Darren Tedders' 605 Hemi has very long runners and a relativly small plenum.
like PPM, i have tried a sheetmetal ram, and mine seemed to run better as i built stuff to take up space in my plenum.
which brings me to the indy mod man intakes, which have very short runners and and a rather large plenum. I would like to try one but just cant wrap my brain around it being better than what i have.
any insite would be appreciated
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
Re: Six pack manifold testing
[Re: sixpackgut]
#1028517
07/09/11 10:52 AM
07/09/11 10:52 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,752 detroit area
moderncylinder
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,752
detroit area
|
the trend for ss/ah motors is definitely not a smaller plenum
the thought or what happens is the larger plenum gives more distance for air/fuel to beable to find its way to the runner being unobstructed by the location of the runner opening and carb placement
you can fill the corners of the manifold to increase booster signal to help it pull fuel at quicker accleration rates,, but it will make more power with a larger plenum,, to a point
long runners and small plenums are for low rpm motors
the reason i say the runner sare too long on the ones pictured above is that i know what the application is,, how small the port cross sections are,, it will peak higher,, by a little,, but way more past peak,, but gain all over with a shorter runner
|
|
|
Re: Six pack manifold testing
[Re: ppmracing]
#1028519
07/10/11 01:04 AM
07/10/11 01:04 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,340 Pennsylvania
proshiftcharger
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,340
Pennsylvania
|
Quote:
Moore testing with oer sheet metal intake for six pack carbs whas great,,, we found almost 20 moore hp and a wery flat power curve. And the trottle respons was awesom. Moore test is coming.
PPM Racing Sweden
When you found 20 more hp what were you comparing your gain too? A single plane 4 bbl intake? an original eldelbrock 6 pack intake? a Hogan sheet metal 6 pack intake?
Its interesting but need more info please. Do you have any numbers to post? ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/1343795-scratchchin.gif)
|
|
|
Re: Six pack manifold testing
[Re: dOc …]
#1028524
07/10/11 04:49 PM
07/10/11 04:49 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 42 Sweden
ppmracing
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 42
Sweden
|
We have tryed moore Six pack intake than anybody i think, foor the last 3 year, On the dyno and on the track. And we are looking for the intake that is fast on the track , not best on the dyno.Allso on the dyno we whant best avarage hp and a long flat power curve. We have that now with the own design we made. We did not have that with the Weiand, Indy,CFE and Hoogans we tryed. We got the allmost 20 horsepower at the peak and 20 moore in torge, but 26 moore avarage hp with PPM design compare to CFE Sheet metal. CFE made the intake and i mean the are one of the best in the industries, did it work ? NO. The have BIG plenum Short runners , no HP gains. AND we could not run it at the track wery bad 60 feet time., the stock Six pack was Way better fromt he startingline.Rebuild it with epoxy longer runners less plenum and it starts to pick up.Same with the Hoogasn ( it is on a engine now ) but it was better littel longer runners and smaller plenum. We have found this out by allot off testing on the same combo so we know what this like. So the trend can be what it is ,but the things that work it works, and on THIS combo this works. We have the same HP at 6100 rpm as we have at 7500 rpm , and the peak at 6700 rpm and we have over 700 hp. It is a 440 SS engine with stock ported heads 202 cc runners,2,08 x 1,74 vales,80cc chambers,Stock short block FT pistone and Custome made roller camshaft with 3 step headers.
|
|
|
Re: Six pack manifold testing
[Re: ppmracing]
#1028525
07/10/11 05:15 PM
07/10/11 05:15 PM
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 952 Stockholm, Sweden
MrSixpack
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 952
Stockholm, Sweden
|
NICE Peter ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bow.gif) Any new pics of my engine, thank god I choose PPM for my new engine build ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbs.gif) Carbs will be sent this week and some $ to ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif) Take care my friend. Jocke
1970 Super Stock Challenger ex. Paul Rossi 1968 Dodge Dart GT 340 1968 Dodge Charger /6 3 speed manual 1966 Chrysler 300 Loaded 1968 Dodge Charger R/T 440
1968 Mini Cooper
|
|
|
Re: Six pack manifold testing
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#1028527
07/12/11 09:53 PM
07/12/11 09:53 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 549 Oregon
abodyman
super street
|
super street
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 549
Oregon
|
ok found it, I KNEW I remembered it was different than str pile of junk! Its not edelbrock str, or whatever, its a "Weiand 6 barrel tunnel ram" chrysler part number P3690982 Its a 2 piece manifold, with tunnel ram runners, and a larger plenum. Plenum top can be changed by bolting different ones on. single 4, dual 4, six-pak... Theres pics of it in the June 1981 Hot Rod magazine "Magnum Mirada" build up series. A 440 Mirada they looked at I think it was owned by "Paul Rossi" You also can get an idea of it, at least the bottom portion and a single 4 top, by looking at item #250851972037 on e-bay. Which you CLEARLY can see the difference between a STR and this type. Just for You guys that didnt know.....and thought you did. ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbs.gif)
|
|
|
Re: Six pack manifold testing
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#1028529
07/13/11 04:09 AM
07/13/11 04:09 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 549 Oregon
abodyman
super street
|
super street
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 549
Oregon
|
![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/whistling.gif) Uh Ok, if You think so.... except the weiand plenums, bigger/different and the runners feed from opposite sides and are longer. I guess if it was all that great a manifold, it wouldn't be so rare now. But Hey...the they Both have a top that bolts on! and bolt to the heads the same...so they must be the same! Maybe I am looking at a different photo.... ![](/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/burnout.gif)
|
|
|
Re: Six pack manifold testing
[Re: abodyman]
#1028530
07/13/11 07:20 AM
07/13/11 07:20 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 42 Sweden
ppmracing
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 42
Sweden
|
Thank you Jocke,,, we shall get moor picture for you on the 440ci SS Six pack enginbuild
The manifold on this picture that we have tested on the dyno and on the track is from the left:
Weiand,,,Indy with own made top,,CFE,,PPM Racing 2 different style.
And al off them is worked to perform as good as possible. Their is allso a Hoogans that is tested but not on this picture.
|
|
|
|
|