Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: The good and BAD things the Ma MoPar engineers did .... [Re: Prince_Valiant] #1012647
06/21/11 12:56 AM
06/21/11 12:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
It seems that it would've been a LOT easier to make a single k frame for each body type. They often used totally different engine brackets anyway.

Re: The good and BAD things the Ma MoPar engineers did .... [Re: Kern Dog] #1012648
06/21/11 09:11 AM
06/21/11 09:11 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
J
joedust451 Offline
super gas
joedust451  Offline
super gas
J

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,221
Branson, Mo.
The good. The styling/Perf. of the older mopars & the way they stood out from the rest.

The Bad. The look on my dads face when i brought one home, He'd say, Geeezzzz, another junky chrysler product. .

Ya know, its funny, there is some truth to what my old man was telling me .


75 Duster, 451 10.87 @ 123.58 NA 97 Z28 6sp., 12.01 @ 115 on a 100 shot 71 Swinger. 360 magnum. 12.58 @ 105 78 cutlass, 469 BBC. 12.70 @ 108 on street tires. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2kqNmMfheU
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1