Quote:

---

Quote:

---

---

BTW, I used the Wallace ET to HP formulas and it showed 564 rear wheel HP and 596 flywheel HP from the weigt and MPH, it does not allow for weather conditions, elevation or any of the other things that need to be used to get a accurate comparision of perforamnce for different tracks, elevation, weather, traction and so on So what good is it

---

so in other words, the wallace calculator and i seem to agree it's not one of those 700 hp combo's like you said early on in the thread.

---

It is what it is is what I said Is the Wallaace claculator your only reference for HP, Torque, ET and so on It is not mine, I post what the dyno sheets say No fudgeing, no fooling with the numbers or any other ego stroking measures Just the facts, Dan BTW take my numbers and run it on one of the other calculators like the Moroso slide stick, Isky or one of the other ones out there. Does that make the results less valid NO It is what I say it is

---

Cab, your absolutely right, it is what it is. maybe one of those other calculators will give 100 horsepower more. did you try it? i guess it just makes me wonder why all those 700+ horsepower motors always run like 600 horsepower motors. i'm sure there's a logical explanation out there somewhere. probably just the tires or the density altitude or the smallish cam with low compression and small carb, or the sun setting in the west or something like that.
don't get upset, my ribbing is all in fun.
i'm sure on better day it would pick up those missing 7 MPH.