Its something to really try to understand why you get this effect. My 340 also went almost 2/10ths faster with that 850DP rather than the 750DP it came with yet I was only using around 6100rpm tops@the traps at the time on stock unported 2.02 heads and only 10:1CR, headers and a strip Dominator with 2" spacer so a nothing special motor.

An engine will only pull the air it needs with a certain head design/bore/stroke/rpm etc. yet a bigger carb always seems to work at the strip defying any method you care to use to calculate its needs. But its not always the case on a dyno, We ran a 950HP holley on a 589ci street wedge motor, only 10:1, had race heads that probably flowed in the 340cfm range@ the solid roller cams max lift of .625", and a 440-2 intake, it pulled 1.9hg vac@wot at 5800rpm and went to 2.0@6000 suggesting the carb was too small, yet when a 1050 Dominator was tried with an adapter it only made 3hp more, that could've been because it wasn't dialled in or the adapter?. but I have read a few times that on similar big ci motors of that size a Dom only made a max of around 10>15hp more if that than say a big 4150, its all combo related I guess but there is no real reason why 1 carb of only 100cfm more can make a 2/10ths difference on a smaller motor and on a large motor that actually needs at least 1050cfm+ of air according to calcs and a dyno it doesn't quite work that way, perhaps at the track it would be a different story and the better way of trying things out. Maybe things need stepping up to 2 x carbs for real gains on big ci motors with enough valve lift of course and rpm. Or perhaps my thinking is somewhat off?

sorry for slight hijack

Last edited by rb446; 02/05/20 09:59 PM.

1969 'Cuda 446ci, best 9.96@133.9 in 1990
1971 340 'Cuda, best 11.01@122.8 in 1987