[quote=TimS]Here are some shots of what I'm dealing with. On second glance it almost appears the engine sits too high instead of what I reported earlier as being too low on the LH side, which is why it rubs the manifold flange. I suppose maybe why it appears not to be straight in the engine compartment.
I dont know if e-bodies used the same log type as a c-body.
I'm going to say that Mopar never used any log type exhaust manifolds on BB in any year E body.
I've never seen any or a picture of a stock E body with them
I tend to think you are right...but, decades ago I traded a set of rusty hooker headers to a guy for his stock manifolds off of a 1970 383-2 challenger. He brought an hp left and a log style right, but I have no way of knowing if it was factory that way, and I never saw the car. The white books do show a lowpo right manifold that fits bce bodies, but shows no lowpo left, only be hp left for b-e body. Maybe thats how they did it, kind of fits his story. I am not sure. That deal made me not want to comment, you see so few 383-2 e-bodies that have not been motor, header swapped.
