3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference

Print Thread

Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference [Re: 73cuda340] #2648823 04/25/19 12:21 PM 04/25/19 12:21 PM
Joined: Feb 2014 Posts: 1,707 central il. S second 70 top fuel
second 70 top fuel S Joined: Feb 2014 Posts: 1,707 central il.	I changed from a 3:54 to 4:10 on my hemi cuda and it only raised the rpm at 70mph 500. It's a 426 4speed and has 28" tall tires. It is a lot more fun to drive now.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	73cuda340	04/25/19 12:10 AM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	W.I.N. Racing	04/25/19 12:26 AM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	Cab_Burge	04/25/19 02:18 AM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	an8sec70cuda	04/25/19 12:06 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	DaveRS23	04/25/19 12:19 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	fast68plymouth	04/25/19 02:06 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	1DGEMAN	04/25/19 03:31 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	second 70	04/25/19 04:21 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	73cuda340	04/25/19 04:25 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	Cab_Burge	04/25/19 04:50 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	73cuda340	04/27/19 07:41 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	383man	04/28/19 01:09 AM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	Cab_Burge	04/28/19 05:06 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	DGS	04/25/19 04:51 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	BSB67	04/26/19 12:29 AM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	73cuda340	04/28/19 02:21 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	StealthWedge67	04/28/19 05:14 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	73cuda340	04/28/19 11:26 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	Cab_Burge	04/29/19 02:43 AM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	mopardude318	04/29/19 07:17 PM
Re: 3.54 vs 3.73 performance difference	Cab_Burge	04/30/19 02:14 AM

Hop To