|
Re: SURPRISE ! 440 Source damper is crap
[Re: IcorkSOAK]
#201446
01/23/09 06:34 AM
01/23/09 06:34 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345 Marysville, O-H-I-O
70Cuda383
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,345
Marysville, O-H-I-O
|
Quote:
IMO ....an item like this should never "fail". How many 35 year old PLUS OEM dampners have you seen be loose? ... or even move ??... I have seen many a Mopar engine and have only seen ONE dampner "move" ..and it was because the guy soaked it in solvent for a couple of days.
I think a part like this should have a lifetime warranty on it.... unless it was physically damaged.
but how many "gurus" and books out there, say to NOT use your 35 year old, OEM dampner, on a performance engine build, and to upgrade to something of higher quality?
was this a stock rebuild? stock cam, low compression, exhaust manifolds, etc. or is the compression bumped up, larger cam, headers, better heads, etc?
**Photobucket sucks**
|
|
|
|
|
|