Quote: .... if all these dyno tests are right .... WHY didn't Eddy just copy the old design with some new cosmetic diffs and sell it that way?
If you study the torque & HP #'s the Perf. RPM is better overall than the CH4B. With a higher peak HP at a lower rpm.
And to answer your question...........the taller newer design is aestetically better looking for marketing too.
The CH4B is a great intake for a stealth underhood upgrade over the heavy cast iron. I'd use one.
DeanO ..... what I meant to compare it to was the regular Performer intake .... if I was Eddy ... I would have copied the base CH4B .... and then tweated it .... BUT they didn't.
Eddy does some things "funny" anyways .... a couple of years ago I asked them for some info on both the SP2P and the Streetmaster and they said they knew ZIP about it.
INTERESTING ....even though I made it plain that I was buildiing a low rpm torque motor with MPG in-mind with a spreadbore carb ...
....even though I made it plain that I was buildiing a low rpm torque motor with MPG in-mind with a spreadbore carb ...