Quote: ...missed the torque on a quick guess it would be higher with the smallish cam, heads and headers.
Many of us expected a fairly low rpm, but it was even lower than I expected (6000 vs 6200). Do people think the low rpm (both torque and hp peaks) were due more to:
1) head/CID 2) cam duration 3) headers
My feeling is mainly head/CID, especially since the stepped headers didn't raise the peak rpms. Then the cam duration (especially for the CID) would be second.
