Quote:

Sorry, not trying to be Mr. Wizard here, but this needs to be said.
The quality of the parts and the installation is not possible to evaluate from here, let's agree that they were well chosen and have held up well.
What I find troubling is the position of the mounts.
The only resistance it offers to forward and back motion is the angle built into the Heim joints - and they're not designed to take any thrust that way. If you had significant motion (another mount fails, etc.) the Heims would go out of range and fail.
Vertical movement of the block is zero, since the 2 links form a triangle. If either link were removed, or both links mounted at different heights separately, the block could rise and fall with some side motion. It would resist rotation (torquing) but not efficiently.
Side to side movement of the block is zero. If it tried to go right, the links are in tension - good, no harm. If it tries to go left, at least 1 link is in compression and will bend.

The only block motion that is both controlled and safe now is an angle rotating the entire block around the fender mount. This is opposite the way the block will move under power.

In short, the hardware is fine, but the relationships are not helping you.
In order to resist engine rotation, the link must always be in tension (pulling down on the left side, or up on the right), never at 90° to the expected force.



Its worked fine for my 790hp rig. Ive seen faster cars with less. if you don't like it don't use it, it was posted for an example.