Re: chrysler tech please help-p2097(long)
[Re: DartGTX]
#990059
05/11/11 07:33 PM
05/11/11 07:33 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Here's a stab in the dark...MAF sensor.
|
|
|
Re: chrysler tech please help-p2097(long)
[Re: rbkt65]
#990062
05/11/11 09:32 PM
05/11/11 09:32 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 163 Winnipeg, MB
sreinheimer
member
|
member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 163
Winnipeg, MB
|
Sure sounds like a vacuum leak at least at first. Have you checked for one yet? Not sure if they are common on those engines but just had a ford 4L have a vacuum leak at the manifold leak only cold for the first 30 seconds and then would run fine. Fuel trims were -40 and counting for the first 30 secs then went back to zero. After doing the intake was fine. Was surprised how fast the leak sealed up but showed up after awhile by smoke testing the manifold. And had no codes.
69 Dodge Charger - first full resto
05 Dodge Magnum R/T
|
|
|
Re: chrysler tech please help-p2097(long)
[Re: DartGTX]
#990064
05/12/11 12:21 AM
05/12/11 12:21 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
NO MAF on Mopars............
Live and learn
|
|
|
Re: chrysler tech please help-p2097(long)
[Re: sreinheimer]
#990065
05/12/11 11:42 AM
05/12/11 11:42 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,825 Sk. Canada
RemCharger
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,825
Sk. Canada
|
Quote:
Sure sounds like a vacuum leak at least at first. Have you checked for one yet? Not sure if they are common on those engines but just had a ford 4L have a vacuum leak at the manifold leak only cold for the first 30 seconds and then would run fine. Fuel trims were -40 and counting for the first 30 secs then went back to zero. After doing the intake was fine. Was surprised how fast the leak sealed up but showed up after awhile by smoke testing the manifold. And had no codes.
Seen intake leaks on 3.5s...
|
|
|
Re: chrysler tech please help-p2097(long)
[Re: sreinheimer]
#990066
05/12/11 12:33 PM
05/12/11 12:33 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421 Balt. Md
383man
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 27,421
Balt. Md
|
Quote:
Sure sounds like a vacuum leak at least at first. Have you checked for one yet? Not sure if they are common on those engines but just had a ford 4L have a vacuum leak at the manifold leak only cold for the first 30 seconds and then would run fine. Fuel trims were -40 and counting for the first 30 secs then went back to zero. After doing the intake was fine. Was surprised how fast the leak sealed up but showed up after awhile by smoke testing the manifold. And had no codes.
Problem is with a vacum leak the long & short term fuel trim would be adding fuel not taking it away as he stated. And the 02 sensors would be low voltage (lean) but he stated his 02's were reading high voltage (rich). This reminds me of many jobs where you just want your hands on that car and reading all the sensor value's. Ron
|
|
|
Re: chrysler tech please help-p2097(long)
[Re: rbkt65]
#990070
05/12/11 11:04 PM
05/12/11 11:04 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,628 Columbus, Ohio
wheelsup68dart
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,628
Columbus, Ohio
|
This Pacifica sets multiple O2 codes. Originally it set a upstream O2 code and later set catalyst efficiency code. I replaced both sensors to make sure they were both good even though they seemed to be switching ok on the scanner. Now it came back with a P2097, downsteam fuel rich 1/2. I gave the O2 readings below and the fuel trim numbers. Any suggestion? Could it have a bad converter?
Thanks.
Related Repair History I replaced the upstream and downstream o2 sensors. It had previously set upstream o2 code and catalyst efficiency code P0420.
Randy Hiebner Technician Tri County Automotive Henderson, Nebraska, USA FIX posted on Jan 25, 2010 4:38:02 PM Thanks too all who responded. I had installed Bosch O2 sensors. I for know have replaced the downstream sensor with an OE Chrysler sensor and the problem hasn't reoccured.
Thanks again, Randy. Manifold Vacuum Readings
Idle: 18.9 in.
Computer Codes & Descriptions
P2097- Downstream fuel system rich 1/2
Other Test Results
Upstream V. - 2.5-3.4 v Upstream Desired V. - 2.06 v Downstream V. - 3.11 v Short adapt - -3% to 2% Long term at idle - 12.5% Long term at 2000 RPM - 9.8%
5 Replies Received (Hide Replies)Please only use this feature to report severe guidelines violations.
Reply 1 Clifford from Texas Jan 20, 2010 10:47:30 AMin the absence of an exhaust leak this code is almost always an aftermarket (usually bosch) o2 sensor. check the integrity of the entire o2 circuit and if good shoot the o2 sensor.
p.s. chrysler converters are failing at an astounding rate. when you replace the o2 prepare for a return of the p0420
Reply 2 from New Mexico Jan 20, 2010 11:19:16 AM check temp inlet and outlet on cat. should be 10% hotter on outlet
Reply 3 Matthew from Illinois Jan 20, 2010 11:37:47 AMIt is not the converter. This is a downstream sensor monitor failure. 2 things to check: 1. make sure there are NO misfires: reason extra reactants in the exhaust will cause a higher downstream voltage 2. Check the downstream heater operation (make sure the chassis ground wire for the heater has nearly zero volts on it) reason: PCM supplied bias will "bleed" over into the signal sense when the sensor cools off (making the internal resistance higher)
Reply 4 Gilbert from Massachusetts Jan 21, 2010 5:01:13 AMThis code can set if a new cat has been put on. If this is the case, the monitor should pass after the new cat gets about 500 miles on it. The other reason it would fail is the use of aftermarket O2 sensors. Mopars need factory O2s to work properly. Also, after replacing O2s on Mopars you need to do a battery disconnect to force the PCM to learn O2 heater resistance values. Failure to do this step will result in improper O2 heater operation.
Reply 5 Charles from Massachusetts Jan 21, 2010 6:43:41 AM also make sure they are plugged into the proper connectors
this info borrowed from Iatn.net
|
|
|
Re: chrysler tech please help-p2097(long)
[Re: wheelsup68dart]
#990071
05/12/11 11:10 PM
05/12/11 11:10 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,628 Columbus, Ohio
wheelsup68dart
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,628
Columbus, Ohio
|
another
2005 Chrysler Pacifica, Poor-mileage/MIL By: David ChampionBy: David from North CarolinaJul 14, 2009 7:42:37 AM3 Replies This car came in a month or so ago with some catylist efficiency codes.It had been replaced about a year ago with an after market converter which was a good bit smaller than the factory one.I diagnosed as a bad converter and replaced it with an OEM converter and replced the down stream o2 senser.About a week later she brought the car back with the check engine light on and said it started making a wierd noise and runing bad then the light came on.I cleared codes and test drove with the scan tool hooked up.The car ran fine and no light .The o2 data looked good and couldn't find a problem. We orderd another o2 sensor and had her to come back when we got it in to replace it thinking that since it didn't have this code before that maybe we had a defective sensor.Changed sens. cleaed codes took agood long 2 drive cycle test drive,car ran fine all looked good.She took the car.Light back on,same code 2097 downstream fuel trim rich.Same noise running bad poor fuel economy.I still couldn't verify the symtoms other than the code.She can't describe the noise or how the car runs.I thought, well ,I should have relaced the up stream o2 as well so I did.She called that night to say it did it again.I've checked for exhaust leaks and vacuum leaks and found none.I graghed the o2 sensors with the snap on vantage and they checked good. I've never seen a cod for downstream fuel trim before on any car and I thiugt downstream o2s didn't affect fuel trims anyway.Has anyone seen this code on one of these before or hany advice on where I should go from here.She brought it back yesterday and I drove it 50 mi. and another 35 mi. this morn. still no light or running prob..Sorry for such a long post.Thanks for taking time to read this and any help you can offer.I should say she brings the car here for regular service and has had a tune up and BG injetion cleaning.
Updated on Jul 14, 2009 10:14 AM No,it's never had any misfire codes.I've never had it to act up for me,just keeps turning on the light.Thanks.
Related Repair History Replaced converter and o2 sensors,up stream and down stream.
Comments posted on Jul 23, 2009 12:22:22 PM Well,it turns out the light came back on a few days later. Same code.She took it back to the dealer and they put a factory o2 sensor and that fixed it.We replaced it with a Bosh when we did the converter and had put a secound one in later.When we changed the up stream we used one from Dodge.We talked about changing the down stream with an OEM but didn't.The scan data looked good so I didn't see the need.So lesson learned,use OEM o2 sensors on these from now on aftermarket wont work.The OEM cost less than the Bosh I've never had any problem using bosh o2s but from now on I will use the OEM .Thanks for everyone's help.By the way I just read Larry's reply.I'm not the only one who had the same problem.Thanks Larry.
David Champion Owner Champion Automotive Shelby, North Carolina, USA FIX posted on Jul 14, 2009 2:19:14 PM Well,I found a problem with the new factory converter.Kody was right,a very small leak will set this code.I used shop air and soapy water and found a weld at the upstream converter flange that was leaking.It allows it to draw in air on deceleration. This flange is just ahead of the upstream o2 sensor.Thanks alot for your time and your help.
|
|
|
|
|