Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 5.7L HEMI in a Pre-67 A-Body [Re: MuuMuu101] #957337
03/25/11 09:23 PM
03/25/11 09:23 PM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,167
Maryland
GO_Fish Offline
master
GO_Fish  Offline
master

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,167
Maryland
Yes, a Dart Charger should have one. I think later production '65 Barracuda's had them available, while '64.5 and early '65 Barracudas did not.


Scott B. "I'm a self-made man... I started with nothing, and I still have most of it!" 68 360 rusty B'cuda 'vert (GO Fish)13.59@ 98.72 mph 69 340 GTS stock 14.18@ 95.60 mph 01 5.9L Ram 1500 Quad Cab 4x4 01 3.5L 300M 16.23@ 86.97 mph
Re: 5.7L HEMI in a Pre-67 A-Body [Re: GO_Fish] #957338
03/25/11 10:21 PM
03/25/11 10:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,074
So Cal, USA
Fab64 Offline
super stock
Fab64  Offline
super stock

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,074
So Cal, USA
This link may help:

5.7 L Hemi in '67 Barracuda

Re: 5.7L HEMI in a Pre-67 A-Body [Re: Fab64] #957339
03/26/11 10:56 AM
03/26/11 10:56 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Supercuda Offline
About to go away
Supercuda  Offline
About to go away

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 14,889
up yours
Quote:

This link may help:

5.7 L Hemi in '67 Barracuda




Major differences, which is why he asked about PRE 67 A bodies.

As for the A body 83/4, if you find on in any year A body it will fit. The rear stayed the same in the later A's, only the front track widened but it was essentially in the frame and K member, the rest of the front is the same.


They say there are no such thing as a stupid question.
They say there is always the exception that proves the rule.
Don't be the exception.
Re: 5.7L HEMI in a Pre-67 A-Body [Re: Supercuda] #957340
03/26/11 01:01 PM
03/26/11 01:01 PM
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 189
Portland,OR
R
rjsjea Offline
member
rjsjea  Offline
member
R

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 189
Portland,OR
Try searching on www.forabodiesonly.com ......several build threads over there that can help ya

Re: 5.7L HEMI in a Pre-67 A-Body [Re: MuuMuu101] #957341
03/27/11 04:13 AM
03/27/11 04:13 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Kern Dog Offline
Striving for excellence
Kern Dog  Offline
Striving for excellence

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,493
Granite Bay CA
Quote:

Cool. How much over 20 mpgs? Because an 07 Charger gets around 17st/25hwy mpgs and that has to be at the very least 500lbs heavier than an early Dart.




The specs on the Charger R/T show it to weigh upwards of 4200 lbs. An early A body with a 273 is in the 2700 range. The HEMI would probably raise it to the 2850 range with the additional girth, wiring and such. 1350 lbs of savings? Not too shabby!

Re: 5.7L HEMI in a Pre-67 A-Body [Re: Kern Dog] #957342
03/27/11 05:15 AM
03/27/11 05:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
1_WILD_RT Offline
Management Trainee
1_WILD_RT  Offline
Management Trainee

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 27,347
Today? Who Knows?
If you want the 545-RFE your best bet is probably to run the Alterkation K so you lose the T bars, then cutting the rear crossmember isn't a problem...


"The Armies of our ancestors were lucky, in that they were not trailed by a second army of pencil pushers."
Re: 5.7L HEMI in a Pre-67 A-Body [Re: 1_WILD_RT] #957343
03/27/11 02:20 PM
03/27/11 02:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 39
ontario canada
D
dart443 Offline
member
dart443  Offline
member
D

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 39
ontario canada
I'm in the process right now!64 Dart,using RMS front suspension,Modern Muscle's wiring and computer,I modified the trans tunnel for 518 trans,any questions let me know!

Re: 5.7L HEMI in a Pre-67 A-Body [Re: dart443] #957344
03/28/11 05:32 PM
03/28/11 05:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,375
SoCal
MuuMuu101 Offline OP
I got lucky at Woodward!
MuuMuu101  Offline OP
I got lucky at Woodward!

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,375
SoCal
Quote:

I'm in the process right now!64 Dart,using RMS front suspension,Modern Muscle's wiring and computer,I modified the trans tunnel for 518 trans,any questions let me know!




Cool! Great! I will if I ever get to that project. The only thing is that RMS can get expensive if you decide to go all then way around the car. I am sure it will give you much less of a headache but I was just thinking of like a complete budget daily driver build. Something along the lines of making new mounts, upgrading the suspension, getting better disc breaks, 518 trans to handle Los Angeles traffic, etc. There is going to be a lot of fabrication, but I am sure that would be much cheaper then going with RMS. Anyway, that will be for much later (if I even get to it, have the money, and find a good enough car). I have a stick shift right now and if I have to drive in LA traffic to go to graduate school or for my job in the future, my feet will not be happy with me.

I already have a 68 Dart project right now and I am thinking about 6.1L with a 5 or 6-speed and an 8 3/4 with somewhere around 3.55-4.10 gears all under an RMS suspension. It is going to be pricey, but I think I am just going to try to elongate the project as much as possible so it will not be too big of a financial burden. Ideally I want to work on the car by myself as much as possible as a learning experience and to lower the costs of labor rather than having my mechanic doing it and not knowing or learning anything about my car.

Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1