|
|
Re: FBS to B-1 intake comparison
[Re: HardcoreB]
#950616
03/14/11 11:03 PM
03/14/11 11:03 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 235
Tucson AZ.
RADAMX
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 235
Tucson AZ.
|
Quote:
Thanks for the pic. Is the intake-to-head mating angle the same? BTW what's with the small pushrods?
Ok yes the angle is the same as a matter of fact I just set a 400 low deck B1 intake on it . and it fit rather well,maybe to well.  ..
The pushrods are 3/8 I don't think They need to be any bigger?
|
|
|
Re: FBS to B-1 intake comparison
[Re: RADAMX]
#950617
03/15/11 08:00 AM
03/15/11 08:00 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,013
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,013
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for the pic. Is the intake-to-head mating angle the same? BTW what's with the small pushrods?
Ok yes the angle is the same as a matter of fact I just set a 400 low deck B1 intake on it . and it fit rather well,maybe to well. ..
The pushrods are 3/8 I don't think They need to be any bigger? [/quote
Depends on the cam. Most high end motors will use something bigger. The longer the pushrod, the bigger it has to be. The same goes for valve train weight, rate of lift, spring used, etc.
8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
